Schools have adopted get-tough policies and support-oriented policies, each of which creates not only potential benefits but also potential risks for youth delinquency and education. This article identifies potential benefits and risks of get-tough approaches and support-oriented approaches, respectively, to reduce delinquency. It then identifies challenges that can arise when schools seek to balance both get-tough and support-oriented policies. We illustrate these challenges by drawing on prior scholarship on these policies as well as a process evaluation of a large metropolitan school district’s pilot initiative to promote school safety and academic performance by assisting court-involved youth. We argue for developing a stronger empirical foundation for school-based approaches that aim to improve school safety and educational outcomes of youth.
AgnewR. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.
2.
AkersR. L.SellersC. S. (2013). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlexanderM. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
4.
Allen-MearesP.MontgomeryK. L.KimJ. S. (2013). School-based social work interventions: A cross-national systematic review. Social Work, 58, 253-262.
5.
AltshulerS. J. (2003). From barriers to successful collaboration: Public schools and child welfare working together. Social Work, 48, 52-63.
6.
AndreouE. (2015). School violence prevention: The youth development perspective. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 5, 389-395.
7.
ArmstrongT. A.ArmstrongG. S.KatzC. M. (2015). Testing the influence of community characteristics on school misconduct. Justice Quarterly, 32, 792-817.
8.
AstorR. A.GuerraN.Van AckerR. (2010). How can we improve school safety research?Educational Researcher, 39, 69-78.
BarnesT. N.SmithS. W.MillerM. D. (2014). School-based cognitive-behavioral intervention in the treatment of aggression in the United States: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 311-321.
11.
BennettW. J.DiIulioJ. J.WaltersJ. P. (1996). Body count: Moral poverty . . . and how to win America’s war against crime and drugs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
12.
BishopD. M.FeldB. C. (2012). Trends in juvenile justice policy and practice. In FeldB. C.BishopD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 898-926). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
BlombergT. G. (1980). Widening the net: An anomaly in the evaluation of diversion programs. In KleinM. W.TeilmannK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation (pp. 572-592). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
BlombergT. G. (1983). Diversion’s disparate results and unresolved questions: An integrative evaluation perspective. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 20, 24-38.
15.
BlombergT. G.BalesW. D.MannK.PiqueroA. R.BerkR. A. (2011). Incarceration, education and transition from delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 355-365.
16.
BoccanfusoC.KuhfeldM. (2011). Multiple responses, promising results: Evidence-based, nonpunitive alternatives to zero tolerance. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
17.
BrentJ. J. (2016). Placing the criminalization of school discipline in economic context. Punishment & Society, 18, 521-543.
18.
BrickmanP.RabinowitzV. C.KaruzaJ.CoatesD.CohnE.KidderL. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368-384.
19.
BrookeJ. (1999, April21). Terror in Littleton: The overview; 2 students in Colorado school said to gun down as many as 23 and kill themselves in a siege. The New York Times, p. A1.
20.
BrownB. (2006). Understanding and assessing school police officers: A conceptual and methodological comment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 591-604.
21.
BrunerC. (1991). Thinking collaboratively: Ten questions and answers to help policy makers improve children’s services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium.
22.
CarneyT.MyersB. J.LouwJ.OkwunduC. I. (2016). Brief school-based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance-using adolescents. London, England: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
23.
CatalanoR. F.LoeberR.McKinneyK. C. (1999). Schools and community interventions to prevent serious and violent offending. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
ChampionK. E.NewtonN. C.BarrettE. L.TeessonM. (2013). A systematic review of school-based alcohol and other drug prevention programs facilitated by computers or the Internet. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 115-123.
ChenG. (2008). Communities, students, schools, and school crime: A confirmatory study of crime in U.S. high schools. Urban Education, 43, 301-318.
27.
CookP. J.GottfredsonD. C.NaC. (2010). School crime control and prevention. Crime and Justice, 39, 313-440.
28.
CrooksC. V.ScottK.EllisW.WolfeD. A. (2011). Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: Distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 393-400.
29.
CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.NaginD. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91, 48S-65S.
DilulioJ. J. (1995, November27). The coming of the super-predators. The Weekly Standard, pp. 23-28.
32.
FaganA. A.Brooke-WeissB.CadyR.HawkinsJ. D. (2009). Strategies to enhance coalition/school partnerships to implement school-based prevention programming. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 387-405.
33.
FarrellA. D.MeyerA. L.KungE. M.SullivanT. N. (2001). Development and evaluation of school-based violence prevention programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 207-220.
34.
FeldB. C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
FinnP.McDevittJ. (2005). National assessment of school resource officer programs final report project. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
36.
FisherB. W.HennessyE. W. (2016). School resource officers and exclusionary discipline in U.S. high schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 217-233.
37.
FormanS. G.OlinS. S.HoagwoodK. E.CroweM.SakaN. (2009). Evidence-based interventions in schools: Developers’ views of implementation barriers and facilitators. School Mental Health, 1, 26-36.
38.
ForstB. (2004). Errors of justice: Nature, sources, and remedies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
GageN. A.SugaiG.LundeK.DeLoretoL. (2013). Truancy and zero tolerance in high school: Does policy align with practice?Education and Treatment of Children, 36, 117-138.
40.
GonzalezT. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: Restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Journal of Law & Education, 41, 281-335.
41.
GottfredsonD. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
GottfredsonD. C. (2017). Prevention research in schools: Past, present, and future. Criminology and Public Policy, 16, 1-21.
43.
GottfredsonD. C.CookP. J.NaC. (2012). Schools and prevention. In WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 269-287). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
GottfredsonG. D.CantorD.GottfredsonD. C.CzehE. R.CrosseS. B.HantmanI. (2002). National study of delinquency prevention in schools. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
45.
GottfredsonG. D.GottfredsonD. C. (2001). What schools do to prevent problem behavior and promote safe environments. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 313-344.
46.
GreenbergM. T. (2010). School-based prevention: Current status and future challenges. Effective Education, 2, 27-52.
47.
GregoryA.CornellD.FanX.SherasP.ShihT.HuangF. (2010). Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 483-496.
48.
GroopmanJ. (2007). How doctors think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
49.
HeavisideS.RowandC.WilliamsC.FarrisE. (1998). Violence and discipline problems in U.S. public schools: 1996-1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
50.
HellriegelK. L.YatesJ. R. (1999). Collaboration between correctional and public school systems serving juvenile offenders: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 55-83.
51.
JamesK.BunchJ.Clay-WarnerJ. (2015). Perceived injustice and school violence: An application of general strain theory. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13, 169-189.
52.
JamesN.McCallionG. (2013). School resource officers: Law enforcement officers in schools. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
53.
JenkinsP. H. (1997). School delinquency and the school social bond. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 337-367.
54.
JohnsonB.SullivanA. (2016). Understanding and challenging dominant discourses about student behaviour at school. In SullivanA.JohnsonB.LucasB. (Eds.), Challenging dominant views on student behaviour at school (pp. 27-43). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
Kang-BrownJ.TroneJ.FratelloJ.Daftary-KapurT. (2013). A generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
56.
KimB. K. E.GilmanA. B.HawkinsJ. D. (2015). School- and community-based preventive interventions during adolescence: Preventing delinquency through science-guided collective action. In MorizotJ.KazemianL. (Eds.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior (pp. 447-460). New York, NY: Springer.
57.
KleinM. W. (1979). Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: A litany of impediments. Crime and Justice, 1, 145-201.
58.
KnutsonL. L. (2000, April16). Clinton pledges funds to add police to schools. Los Angeles Times, p. A24.
59.
KupchikA. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York: New York University Press.
60.
KupchikA.BrentJ. J.MowenT. J. (2015). The aftermath of Newtown: More of the same. British Journal of Criminology, 55, 1115-1130.
61.
KupchikA.WardG. (2014). Race, poverty, and exclusionary school security: An empirical analysis of U.S. elementary, middle, and high schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14, 332-354.
62.
LatessaE. J.ListwanS. J.KoetzleD. (2014). What works (and doesn’t) in reducing recidivism. Waltham, MA: Anderson.
63.
LawrenceR. (2007). School crime and juvenile justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64.
LeiberM.RodriguezN. (2011). The implementation of the disproportionate minority confinement/contact (DMC) mandate: A failure or success?Race and Justice, 1, 103-124.
65.
LeoneP.QuinnM. M.OsherD. M. (2002). Collaboration in the juvenile justice system and youth serving agencies. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
66.
LyonsW.DrewJ. (2006). Punishing schools: Fear and citizenship in American public education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
67.
MayD. C.BarrancoR.StokesE.RobertsonA. A.HaynesS. H. (2018). Do school resource officers really refer juveniles to the juvenile justice system for less serious offenses. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29, 89-105.
McKennaJ. M.PollockJ. M. (2014). Law enforcement officers in school: An analysis of ethical issues. Criminal Justice Ethics, 33, 163-184.
70.
MearsD. P. (2012). The front end of the juvenile court: Intake and informal vs. formal processing. In FeldB. C.BishopD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 573-605). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71.
MearsD. P.BaconS. (2009). Improving criminal justice through better decision making: Lessons from the medical system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 142-154.
72.
MearsD. P.KuchJ. J.LindseyA. M.SiennickS. E.PestaG. B.GreenwaldM. A.BlombergT. G. (2016). Juvenile court and contemporary diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both?Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 1-29.
73.
MuschertG. W. (2007). The Columbine victims and the myth of the juvenile superpredator. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 351-366.
74.
NaC.GottfredsonD. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30, 619-650.
75.
NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice, 38, 115-200.
76.
NanceJ. P. (2016). Students, police, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Washington University Law Review, 93, 919-987.
77.
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (2015). Report on the evaluation of judicially led responses to eliminate school pathways to the juvenile justice system. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
78.
NeimanS. (2011). Crime, violence, discipline, and safety in U.S. public schools: Findings from the school survey on crime and safety: 2009-10. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
PayneA. A.EckertR. (2010). The relative importance of provider, program, school, and community predictors of the implementation quality of school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science, 11, 126-141.
81.
PayneA. A.GottfredsonD. C.GottfredsonG. D. (2006). School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national study. Prevention Science, 7, 225-237.
82.
PerryB. L.MorrisE. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79, 1067-1087.
83.
Perumean-ChaneyS. E.SuttonL. M. (2012). Students and perceived school safety: The impact of school security measures. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 570-588.
84.
PetersonR. L.LarsonJ.SkibaR. (2001). School violence prevention: Current status and policy recommendations. Law and Policy, 23, 345-371.
85.
PopeC. E.LeiberM. J. (2010). Disproportionate minority confinement/contact (DMC): The federal initiative. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 351-389). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
86.
Porath-WallerA. J.BeasleyE.BeirnessD. J. (2010). A meta-analytic review of school-based prevention for cannabis use. Health Education & Behavior, 37, 709-723.
87.
RayJ. V.ChildsK. (2015). Juvenile diversion. In KrohnM. D.LaneJ. (Eds.), The handbook of juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice (pp. 422-438). Malden, MA: John Wiley.
88.
ReavesB. A.GoldbergA. L. (2000). Local police departments, 1997. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
89.
ReeseW. J. (2013). Testing wars in the public schools: A forgotten history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90.
RendónM. G. (2014). “Caught up”: How urban violence and peer ties contribute to high school noncompletion. Social Problems, 61, 61-82.
91.
RichterP. (1994, October22). Clinton to sign school gun curb in California. Los Angeles Times, p. 18.
92.
RingoldD. J. (2002). Boomerang effects in response to public health interventions: Some unintended consequences in the alcoholic beverage market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25, 26-63.
93.
RipleyA. (2016, November). At least 22 states make it a crime to disturb school in ways that teenagers are wired to do. Why did this happen? How America outlawed adolescence. The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 86-96.
94.
RossiP. H.LipseyM. W.FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95.
SharmaM.BranscumP. (2013). School-based drug abuse prevention programs in high school students. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 57, 51-65.
96.
ShermanL. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 445-473.
97.
SkibaR. J. (2014). The failure of zero tolerance. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 22, 27-33.
98.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (pp. 1063-1089). New York, NY: Routledge.
99.
SkibaR. J.ReynoldsC. R.GrahamS.SherasP.ConoleyJ. C.Garcia-VazquezE. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
100.
SkladM.DiekstraR.De RitterM.BenJ.GravesteinC. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment?Psychology in the Schools, 49, 892-909.
101.
SnyderH. N. (2012). Juvenile delinquents and juvenile justice clientele: Trends and patterns in crime and justice system response. In FeldB. C.BishopD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
102.
SooleD.MazerolleL.RomboutsS. (2008). School-based drug prevention programs: A review of what works. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41,259-286.
103.
StormshakE. A.BrownK. L.MooreK. J.DishionT.SeeleyJ.SmoklowskiK. (2016). Going to scale with family-centered, school-based interventions: Challenges and future directions. In SheridanS. M.KimE. M. (Eds.), Family-school partnerships in context (pp. 25-44). New York, NY: Springer.
104.
Swain-BradwayJ.PinkneyC.FlanneryK. B. (2015). Implementing schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports in high schools: Contextual factors and stages of implementation. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47, 245-255.
105.
SweetenG. (2007). Who will graduate? Disruption of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462-480.
106.
TheriotM. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 280-287.
107.
TheriotM. T.OrmeG. J. (2016). School resource officers and students’ feelings of safety at school. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14, 130-146.
108.
ThompsonA. (2011). A systematic review of evidence-based interventions for students with challenging behaviors in school settings. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 8,304-322.
109.
TimmP. (2015). School security: How to build and strengthen a school safety program. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
110.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Report on the implementation of the gun-free schools act in the states and outlying areas: School years 2005-06 and 2006-07. Washington, DC: Author.
111.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011, July21). Secretary Duncan, Attorney General Holder announce effort to respond to school-to-prison pipeline by supporting good discipline practices [Press release]. Washington, DC: Author.
112.
WelshW. N. (2004). Individual and institutional predictors of school disorder. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 346-368.
113.
WilsonD. B.GottfredsonD. C.NajakaS. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 247-272.
114.
WolfK. C.KupchikA. (2017). School suspensions and adverse experiences in adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 34, 407-430.
