In 2013, a group of scholars from Europe and North America came together to form the International Network for Hate Studies (INHS). The key aims of the network included bridging gaps between academics and policy makers/practitioners in the field, and “internationalizing” our understanding of hate crime generally. In the spring of 2014, INHS held its inaugural conference at the University of Sussex in Brighton, the United Kingdom. In this special edition of Criminal Justice Policy Review (CJPR), we bring together expanded versions of four of the keynote speeches from that conference. In distinct ways, each speaks to the key themes noted above, as this brief introduction will illustrate.
AhmedA. (1995). “Ethnic cleansing”: A metaphor for our time?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18, 1-25.
2.
BraxD.MuntheC. (Eds.). (2015). The philosophical aspects of hate crime and hate crime legislation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1687-1695.
3.
ChakrabortiN. (2014). Introduction and overview. In ChakrabortiN.GarlandJ. (Eds.), Responding to hate crime: The case for connecting policy and research (pp.1-9). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
4.
ChakrabortiN.GarlandN. (Eds.). (2014). Responding to hate crime: The case for connecting policy and research. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
5.
GiannasiP. (2014). Academia from a practitioner’s perspective: A reflection on the changes in the relationship between academia, policing and government in a hate crime context. In ChakrabortiN.GarlandJ. (Eds.), Responding to hate crime: The case for connecting policy and research (pp. 27-38). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
6.
HallN. (2014). The adventures of an accidental academic in “policy-land”: A personal reflection of bridging academia, policing and government in a hate crime context. In ChakrabortiN.GarlandJ. (Eds.), Responding to hate crime: The case for connecting policy and research (pp. 13-26). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
7.
HallN. (2015). Hate crime (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
8.
IganskiP. (1999). Why make “hate” a crime?Critical Social Policy, 60, 386-395.
9.
IganskiP. (2008). “Hate crime” and the city. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, University of Bristol.
10.
IganskiP.LagouS. (2015). Hate crimes hurt some more than others: Implications for the just sentencing of offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1696-1718.
11.
KaplanJ.BjorgoT. (1998). Nation and race. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
12.
KellyR.MaughanJ. (1998). Hate crime: The global politics of polarization. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
13.
Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. (2009). Hate crime laws: A practical guide. Warsaw, Poland: Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
14.
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. (2012). Tackling hate crimes: An analysis of bias-motivated incidents in Bosnia and Herzegovina with recommendations. Sarajevo: OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina.
15.
PerryB. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
PerryB. (2009). Set introduction. In PerryB. (Gen. Ed.), Hate crime (5 Vol., pp. ix-xiii). Westport, CT: Praeger.
17.
PerryB.AlviS. (2012). “We are all vulnerable”: The in terrorem effects of hate crimes. International Review of Victimology, 18, 57-71.
18.
SchweppeJ. (2012). Defining characteristics and politicising victims: A legal perspective. Journal of Hate Studies, 10, 173-198.
19.
WaltersM. A. (2011). A general theory of hate crime? Strain, doing difference and self control. Critical Criminology, 19, 313-330.
20.
WaltersM. A. (2014). Hate crime and restorative justice: Exploring causes, repairing harms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
