The role that department policy plays in shaping how police officers exercise their discretionary powers to use physical force against citizens is a critical issue in the American justice system. Research has established that department policies regarding officers’ use of deadly force effected firearm use and led to reductions in incidents of officers discharging their weapon. There is a noticeable lack of similar evidence on the effects of policy changes regarding the use of non-lethal force. This study describes the results of an assessment of the effect that a change in policy governing a specific type of non-lethal force—TASERs—in one major police department had on officers’ use of the device. The results show that a move to a more restrictive TASER policy led to a reduction in TASER use. The study also reports on the role that factors besides policy play in officers’ TASER usage.
AdamsK.JennisonV. (2007). What we do not know about police use of TASERs. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 447-465.
2.
AlpertG.DunhamR. (2010). Policy and training recommendations related to police use of TASERs: Overview of findings from a comprehensive national study. Police Quarterly, 13, 235-259.
3.
AlpertG.MacDonaldJ. (2001). Police use of force: An analysis of organizational characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 18, 393-409.
4.
Amnesty International. (2007). Amnesty international’s concerns about TASER Use: Statement to the U.S. Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody. London, England: Author.
BittnerE. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
9.
BleetmanA.SteynR.LeeC. (2004). Introduction of the Taser into British policing. Implications for UK emergency departments: An overview of electronic weaponry. Emergency Medicine Journal, 21, 136-140.
10.
BozemanW. P.KlingerD. A.VailS. J. (2013). Suspect and officer injuries associated with modern police use of force. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 62(4), S74.
11.
BozemanW. P.TeacherE.WinslowJ. (2012). Transcardiac Conducted Electrical Weapon (TASER) probe deployments: Incidence and outcomes. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 43, 970-975.
12.
BrandlS.StroshineM.FrankJ. (2001). Who are the complaint-prone officers? An examination of the relationship between police officers’ attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens’ complaints about excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 521-529.
13.
ChermakS. (2009). Conducted energy devices and criminal justice policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 861-864.
14.
CohenL.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
15.
CrowM.AdrionB. (2011). Focal concerns and police use of force: Examining the factors associated with Taser use. Police Quarterly, 14, 366-387.
16.
DawesD.HoJ.ReardonR.MinerJ. (2010). Echocardiographic evaluation of TASER X26 probe deployment into the chests of human volunteers. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 28, 49-55.
17.
EastmanA.MetzgerJ.PepeP.BenitezF.DeckerJ.RinnertK.. . .FrieseR. (2008). Conductive electrical devices: A prospective, population-based study of the medical safety of law enforcement use. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 64, 1567-1572.
18.
EngelR. (2003). Explaining suspects’ resistance and disrespect toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 475-492.
19.
EztioniA. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York, NY: Free Press
20.
FergusonK.MindelC. (2007). Modeling fear of crime in Dallas neighborhoods a test of social capital theory. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 322-349.
21.
FyfeJ. (1978). Shots fired: An examination of New York City police firearms discharges (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Albany.
22.
GatesD. (1992). Chief: My life in the LAPD. New York, NY: Bantam.
23.
GauJ.MosherC.PrattT. (2010). An inquiry into the impact of suspect race on police use of Tasers. Police Quarterly, 13, 27-48.
24.
HickmanM.PiqueroA.GarnerJ. (2008). Toward a national estimate of police use of nonlethal force. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 563-604.
25.
HippJ.CurranP.BollenK.BauerD. (2004). Crimes of opportunity or crimes of emotion? Testing two explanations of seasonal change in crime. Social Forces, 82, 1333-1372.
KaminskiR. (2009). Research on conducted energy devices: Findings, methods, and a possible alternative. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 903-913.
29.
KaneR. (2002). The social ecology of police misconduct. Criminology, 40, 867-896.
30.
KleinigJ. (2007). Ethical constraints on Taser use by police. Policing, 1, 284-292.
31.
KlingerD. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277-306.
32.
KlingerD. (2004). Environment and organization: Reviving a perspective on the police. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 119-136.
33.
LevineS.SloaneC.ChanT.DunfordJ.VilkeG. (2007). Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the TASER. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 33, 113-117.
McElvainJ. P.KposowaA. J. (2004). Police officer characteristics and internal affairs investigations for use of force allegations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 265-279.
39.
MelekianB.WexlerC. (2011). 2011 electronic control weapons guidelines. Washington, DC: Joint Project, Police Executive Research Forum & Community Oriented Policing Services.
40.
MicucciA.GommeI. (2005). American police and subcultural support for the use of excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 487-500.
41.
MillerM. (2010). Taser use and the use-of-force continuum: Examining the effect of policy change. The Police Chief, 77, 72-76.
42.
MorganJ. (2008). Medical panel issues interim findings on stun gun safety. NIJ Journal, 261, 20-23.
43.
MorrisonG.GarnerT. (2011). Latitude in deadly force training: Progress or problem?Police Practice & Research, 12, 341-361.
44.
MukaseyM.SedgwickJ.HagyD. (2008). Study of deaths following electro muscular disruption: Interim report. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
45.
National Institute of Justice. (2011). Study of deaths following electro muscular disruption. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
46.
NovackK.AlaridL.LucasW. (2003). Exploring officers’ acceptance of community policing: Implications for policy implementation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 57-71.
47.
PaolineE. (2004). Shedding light on police culture: An examination of officers’ occupational attitudes. Police Quarterly, 7, 205-236.
48.
RatcliffeJ. (2004). The hotspot matrix: A framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice & Research, 5, 5-23.
49.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. (2003). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1-17.
50.
RottonJ.CohnE. (2000). Violence is a curvilinear function of temperature in Dallas: A replication. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78, 1074-1081.
51.
SchlosbergM.LevinJ.BatliwallaS.DanielsJ. (2005). Stun gun fallacy: How the lack of Taser regulation endangers lives. San Francisco: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.
52.
ScottW. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
53.
ShermanL. W. (1983). Reducing police gun use: Critical events, administrative policy and organizational change. In PunchM. (Ed.), Control in the police organization (pp. 98-125). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
54.
SingerJ.WillettJ. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
SmithM. (2008). Toward a national use-of-force data collection system: One small (and focused) step is better than a giant leap. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 619-627.
56.
SobolJ. (2010). The social ecology of police attitudes. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33, 253-269.
57.
TaylorB.AlpertG.KubuB.WoodsD.DunhamR. (2011). Changes in officer use of force over time: A descriptive analysis of a national survey. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 34, 211-232.
58.
TerrillW. (2010). Police use of nondeadly force: From determining appropriateness to assessing the impact of policy. In McCoyC. (Ed.), Holding police accountable (pp. 55-72). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
59.
TerrillW.PaolineE. (2011). Conducted energy devices (CED’s) and citizen injuries: The shocking empirical reality. Justice Quarterly, 29, 153-182.
60.
TerrillW.PaolineE. (2013). Less lethal force policy and police officer perceptions: A multisite examination. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 1109-1130.
61.
TerrillW.PaolineE.ManningP. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41, 1003-1034.
62.
ThomasK.CollinsP.LovrichN. (2010). Conducted energy device use in municipal policing: Results of a national survey on policy and effectiveness assessments. Police Quarterly, 13, 290-315.
VilkeG.ChanT. (2007). Less lethal technology: Medical issues. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 341-357.
65.
WhiteM.ReadyJ. (2010). The impact of the Taser on suspect resistance: Identifying predictors of effectiveness. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 70-102.
66.
WhiteM. (2001). Controlling police decisions to use deadly force: Reexamining the importance of administrative policy. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 131-151.
67.
WhiteM.ReadyJ. (2007). The TASER as a less lethal force alternative: Findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Quarterly, 10, 170-191.
68.
YanY. (2004). Seasonality of property crime in Hong Kong. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 276-283.
69.
ZipesD. (2012). Sudden cardiac arrest and death following application of shocks from a TASER electronic control device. Circulation, 125, 2417-2422.
