Fear of crime has been recognized as one of the driving forces underlying the punitive turn in the criminal justice system. Despite this, evidence suggests that rehabilitative efforts are still supported by the general public. The current study uses a national random sample to examine the impact of fear on public preference for allocating resources to rehabilitative versus punitive criminal justice system policies. Contrary to prior studies, respondents are forced to make a choice between punitive and rehabilitative options, and both the emotional and cognitive aspects of crime salience—fear of crime and victimization risk—are evaluated to determine their independent and combined impact on crime policy preference. The findings suggest that the majority of the public prefers putting resources toward rehabilitative crime polices, but fear of crime and risk of victimization both reduce this tendency. The implications of our results for current criminal justice system policies are discussed.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2004). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55.
3.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. Prison Journal, 77, 237-258.
4.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89-100.
5.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G.SundtJ. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you’re-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 517-534.
6.
BakerT.ClearyH. M. D.PickettJ. T.GertzM. G. (2013). Crime salience and public willingness to pay for child saving and juvenile punishment. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128713505487
7.
BarkanS. E.CohenS. F. (2005). Why Whites favor spending more money to fight crime: The role of racial prejudice. Social Problems, 5, 300-314.
8.
BaumerE. P.MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2003). Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 844-875.
9.
BeckettK.SassonT. (2004). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
ChiricosT.HoganM.GertzM. (1997). Racial composition of neighborhood and fear of crime. Criminology, 35, 107-131.
12.
ChiricosT.McEntireR.GertzM. (2001). Perceived racial and ethnic composition of neighborhood and perceived risk of crime. Social Problems, 48, 322-340.
13.
CostelloeM. T.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society, 11, 25-49.
14.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sentencing. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
15.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1-79.
16.
CullenF. T.SkovronS. E.ScottJ. E.BurtonV. S. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6-18.
17.
EitleD.TaylorJ. (2008). Are Hispanics the new “threat”? Minority group threat and fear of crime in Miami-Dade County. Social Science Research, 37, 1102-1115.
18.
FarrallS.JacksonJ.GrayE. (2009). Social order and the fear of crime in contemporary times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
FerraroK. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
FerraroK. F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault. Social Forces, 75, 667-690.
21.
FrostN. A. (2010). Beyond public opinion polls: Punitive public sentiment and criminal justice policy. Sociology Compass, 4, 156-168.
22.
GabrielU.GreveW. (2003). The psychology of fear of crime: Conceptual and methodological perspectives. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 600-614.
23.
GerberM. M.HirtenlehnerH.JacksonJ. (2010). Insecurities about crime in Germany, Austria and Switzerland: A review of research findings. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 141-157.
24.
GrayE.JacksonJ.FarrallS. (2011). In search of the fear of crime: Using interdisciplinary insights to improve the conceptualization and measurement of everyday insecurities. In GaddD.KarstedtS.MessnerS. (Eds.), Sage handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 268-281). London, England: Sage.
25.
HaleC. (1996). Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology, 4, 79-150.
JacksonJ. (2006). Introducing fear of crime to risk research. Risk Analysis, 26, 253-264.
28.
JacksonJ. (2011). Revisiting risk sensitivity in the fear of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 513-537.
29.
JanI. F.BallJ.WalshA. (2008). Predicting public opinion about Juvenile Waivers. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 1-14.
30.
KingR. D.WheelockD. (2007). Group threat and social control: Race, perceptions of minorities and the desire to punish. Social Forces, 85, 1255-1280.
31.
LangworthyR.WhiteheadJ. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575-591.
32.
LiskaA. E. (1992). Social threat and social control. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
LiskaA. E.LawrenceJ. J.SanchiricoA. (1982). Fear of crime as a social fact. Social Forces, 60, 760-770.
34.
MarunaS.KingA. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In BottomsA.RexS.RobinsonG. (Eds.), Alternatives to prison: Options for an insecure society (pp. 83-112). Cullompton: Willan.
35.
MasciniP.HoutmanD. (2006). Rehabilitation and repression: Reassessing their ideological embeddedness. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 822-836.
36.
MonterossoS. (2009). Punitive criminal justice and policy in contemporary society. QUT Law and Justice Journal, 9, 13-25.
37.
MoonM. M.SundtJ. L.CullenF. T.WrightJ. P. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 38-60.
38.
O’RourkeD.BlairJ. (1983). Improving random respondent selection in telephone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 428-432.
39.
PiqueroA. R.CullenF. T.UnneverJ. D.PiqueroN. L.GordonJ. A. (2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 12, 187-207.
40.
PiqueroA. R.SteinbergL. (2010). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1-6.
41.
RobertsJ. V.HoughJ. M. (2005). Understand public attitudes to criminal justice. New York, NY: Open University Press.
42.
RobertsJ. V.StalansL. J. (1997). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
RobertsJ. V.StalansL. J.IndermaurD.HoughM. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
RosenbergerJ. S.CallananV. J. (2011). The influence of media on penal attitudes. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 435-455.
45.
RothmanD. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
46.
ShichorD. (2000). Penal policies at the threshold of the twenty-first century. Criminal Justice Review, 25, 1-30.
47.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the War on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SimsB.JohnstonE. (2004). Examining public opinion about crime and justice: A statewide study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 270-293.
49.
SundtJ. L.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K.TurnerM. G. (1998). The tenacity of the rehabilitative ideal revisited: Have attitudes towards offender treatment changed?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 426-442.
50.
TolnayS. E.BeckE. M.MasseyJ. L. (1989). Black lynchings: The power threat hypothesis revisited. Social Forces, 67, 605-623.
51.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2009). Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 283-312.
52.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48, 99-129.
53.
WilliamsF. P.McShaneM. D.AkersR. L. (2000). Worry about victimization: An alternative and reliable measure for fear of crime. Western Criminology Review, 2. Retrieved from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v2n2/williams.html
54.
ZimringF. (1998). American youth violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
