Although many states have enacted statewide residency restriction laws, others have left the need for, and content of, these laws to local municipalities. To better understand within-state variation in residency restriction laws, this study investigates the public’s desire for these laws and the distances they feel restrictions should be from public spaces populated by children. We review both quantitative and qualitative data from a statewide survey to determine where the public feels sex offenders can live without threatening children. Our results are interpreted using the “dikes” perspective of public opinion to predict the passage and content of future of residency restriction laws.
AndersonA. L.EvansM. K.SampleL. L. (2009). Who accesses the sex offender registries? A look at legislative intent and citizen action in Nebraska. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 22, 1-23.
2.
AndersonA. L.SampleL. L. (2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 371-396.
3.
BarnesJ. C.DukesT.TewksburyR.De TroyeT. M. (2009). Analyzing the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 21-43.
4.
BaumgartnerF. R.JonesB. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BestJ. (2013). Social problems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
6.
BrooksJ. E. (1990). The opinion-policy nexus in Germany. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 508-529.
7.
BurchfieldK. B. (2011). Residency restrictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 411-419.
8.
Canes-WroneB. (2006). Who leads who? Presidents, policy, and the public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CasadyT. (2009). A police chief’s viewpoint: Geographic aspects of sex offender residency restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 16-20.
10.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2000). Public opinion and the criminal Justice system: Building support for sex offender management programs. Washington, DC: Office of Justice programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2008). Legislative trends in sex offender management. Washington, DC: Office of Justice programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2010). Exploring public attitudes and opinions about sex offender management: Findings from a national opinion poll. Washington, DC: Office of Justice programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
ChajewskiM.MercadoC. C. (2008). An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 44-61.
14.
ComartinE. B.KernsmithP. D.KernsmithR. M. (2009). Sanctions and sex offenders: Fear and public policy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 605-619.
15.
DumanisB. M. (2009). A District Attorney’s viewpoint: Geographic aspects of residency restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 13-15.
16.
EganP. J. (2011). Public opinion, the media, and social issues. In ShapiroR. Y.JacobsL. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 622-638). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
GibbsG. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
18.
HirschfieldP. J.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology, 48, 27-55.
19.
HughesL. A.BurchfieldK. B. (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: An environmental injustice?Justice Quarterly, 25, 161-201.
20.
KeyV. O. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
21.
LevensonJ. (2009). Sex offender residence restrictions. In WrightR. G. (Ed.), Sex offender laws: Rhetoric and reality (pp. 211-242). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
LevensonJ. S.BrannonY.FortneyT.BakerJ. (2007). Public perceptions and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 1-25.
23.
LevensonJ. S.CotterL. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
24.
LevensonJ. S.HernA. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community re-entry. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 59-73.
25.
LevensonJ. S.ZgobaK.TewksburyR. (2007). Sex offender, residence restrictions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic. Federal Probation, 71, 2-9.
26.
ManciniC.ShieldsR. T.MearsD. P.BeaverK. M. (2010). Sex offender residence restriction laws: Parental perceptions and public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1022-1030.
27.
MeloyM. L.MillerS. L.CurtisK. M. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: The deconstruction of state-level residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 209-222.
28.
Neb. Rev. Stat. §28-101 (LB 1999-2006).
29.
SampleL. L.KadleckC. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 40-62.
30.
SchiavoneS. K.JeglicE. L. (2009). Public perceptions of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 679-695.
31.
SobelR. (2001). The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
SociaK. M. (2012). The efficacy of county-level sex offender residence restrictions in New York. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 612-642.
33.
WagnerL. A. (2009). Sex offender residency restrictions: How common sense places children at risk. Drexel Law Review, 1, 175-209.
34.
WoodJ. (2009). Why public opinion of the criminal justice system is important. In WoodJ.GannonT. (Eds.), Public opinion and criminal justice (pp. 33-48). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
35.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nation and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ZandbergenP. A.LevensonJ.HartT. C. (2010). Residential proximity to schools and daycares: An empirical analysis of sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 482-502.
37.
ZgobaK. M.LevensonJ.McKeeT. (2009). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 91-110.
