Over the past three decades, concomitant increases in prison population and the use of parole, coupled with a more punitive parole philosophy and fiscal crises at every level of government, have prompted a renewed interest in intermediate sanctions— especially for technical parole violators. A number of jurisdictions have developed intermediate sanctions that are both custodial and therapeutic—but do not involve a return to prison—for technical violators. Despite their growing popularity, little research has examined these technical violator programs, and as a result, basic questions regarding their impact remain unanswered. This article examines a therapeutic technical violator program in the state of New Jersey called Halfway Back. Using a quasiexperimental, retrospective matched groups design, the study explores the impact of the program through a comparison of recidivism and incarceration costs among random samples of program participants (n = 227) and nonparticipants (n = 392). Results suggest that program participants experienced modest though statistically significant reductions in new arrests over the 18-month follow-up period. An examination of incarceration costs related to program participation shows that Halfway Back sets the stage for measurable cost savings though the degree to which these savings are realized remains unclear. The article concludes with a discussion of implications for parole policy and practice.
Austin, J., & Irwin, J. ( 2000). It’s about time: America’s imprisonment binge (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Blumstein, A., & Beck, A.J. ( 1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. Crime and Justice, 26, 17-61.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1995). Probation and parole violators in state prison, 1991: Survey of state prison inmates, 1991. Washington, DC: Author.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008). Reentry trends in the U.S.: definitions. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/reentry/definition.htm
7.
Burke, P.B. ( 1997). Policy-driven responses to probation and parole violations . Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
8.
Burke, P.B. ( 2004). Parole violations revisited: A handbook on strengthening parole practices for public safety and successful transition to the community . Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
9.
Council of State Governments. (2005). Report of the re-entry policy council: Charting the safe and successful return of prisoners to the community. New York: Author.
10.
D’Amico, J. ( 2005). State Parole Board Annual Report 2004. Trenton: New Jersey State Parole Board.
11.
D’Amico, J. ( 2006). State Parole Board Annual Report 2005. Trenton: New Jersey State Parole Board.
12.
Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. ( 2002). Propensity score-matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161.
13.
Fretz, R., Erickson, J., & Mims, A. ( 2007). Reentry programming and female offenders: The case for a gender-responsive approach. Kearny, NJ: Community Education Centers.
14.
Gaes, G.G., Flanagan, T.J., Motiuk, L.L., & Stewart, L. ( 1999). Adult correctional treatment. Crime and Justice, 26, 361-426.
15.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
16.
Gilliard, D.K., & Beck, A.J. ( 1997). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 1996. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. ( 2007). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
Grattet, R., Petersilia, J., & Lin, J. ( 2008). Parole violators and revocations in California. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19.
Hollander, L. ( 2006). Programs aimed at reducing recidivism by improving parole outcomes. Lansing, MI: Senate Fiscal Agency.
20.
Hughes, T., Wilson, D., & Beck, A. ( 2001). Trends in state parole, 1990-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
Institute of Public Policy. (2006). Alternative sentencing & strategies for successful prisoner reentry. Columbia: University of Missouri.
22.
Kassebaum, G. ( 1999). Survival on parole: A study of post-prison adjustment and the risk of returning to prison in the state of Hawaii. Honolulu: Social Science Research Institute and Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii.
23.
Kassebaum, G., & Davidson-Corondo, J. (2001). Parole decision making in Hawaii: Setting minimum terms, approving release, deciding on revocation, and predicting success and failure on parole. Honolulu : Social Science Research Institute and Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii.
24.
Listwan, S.J., Cullen, F.T., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2006). How to prevent prisoner re-entry programs from failing: Insights from evidence-based corrections. Federal Probation , 70, 19-25.
25.
Lowenkamp, C.T. ( 2004). Correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness: A multi-site, program-level analysis. Retrieved April 25, 2009 , from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/send-pdf.cgi?acc_num=ucin1075814673
26.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Holsinger, A.M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77-93.
27.
MacKenzie, D.L. ( 2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Martin, B., & Van Dine, S. ( 2008). Examining the impact of Ohio’s progressive sanction grid. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
29.
Moran, R. ( 2005). Drop in NJ’s prison population defies trend. Trenton: New Jersey State Parole Board.
30.
Munden, D., Tewksbury, R., & Grossi, E. ( 1998). Intermediate sanctions and the halfway back program in Kentucky. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 431-449.
31.
National Research Council. (2008). Parole, distance from crime and community integration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
32.
New Jersey Department of Corrections. (2007 ). NJDOC 2007 annual report. Trenton: Author.
33.
New Jersey Department of Corrections. (2009 ). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://www.nj.gov/corrections/OTS/faq_ots.html
34.
Padgett, K.G., Bales, W.D., & Blomberg, T. ( 2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 61-92.
35.
Palmer, T. ( 1995). Programmatic and programmatic aspects of successful intervention: New directions for research. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 100-131.
36.
Parent, D.G., Wentworth, D., Burke, P., & Ney, B. ( 1994). Responding to probation and parole violators. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
37.
Pastore, A.L., & Maguire, K. ( 1997). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, Table 6.42 . Retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/sb1997/sb1997-section6.pdf
38.
Pastore, A.L., & Maguire, K. ( 2006). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, Table 6.1.2006 . Retrieved April 25, 2009 from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t612006.pdf
39.
Petersilia, J. ( 2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry . New York: Oxford University Press .
40.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. ( 1991). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 610-658.
41.
Petersilia, J., & Travis, J. ( 2001). Reentry reconsidered: A new look at an old question. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 291-313.
42.
Pew Center on the States. (2007). What works in community corrections: An interview with Dr. Joan Petersilia . Washington, DC: Author.
43.
Roman, J., & Chalfin, A. ( 2006). Does it pay to invest in reentry programs for jail inmates?Washington, DC: The Urban Institute .
44.
Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D.B. ( 1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
45.
Rothfeld, M. ( 2009, August 23). Decisive action on prison cuts is hard to come by. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prisons23-2009aug23,0,7630901.story
46.
Sabol, W.J., Minton, T.D., & Harrison, P.M. (2007). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
47.
Steen, S., & Opsal, T. ( 2007). Punishment on the installment plan: Individual-level predictors of parole revocation in four states. The Prison Journal, 87, 344-366.
48.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. ( 2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Travis, J., Keegan, S., & Cadora, E. ( 2003). A portrait of prisoner reentry in New Jersey. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
51.
Travis, J., & Waul, M. ( 2002). Presentation: A portrait of prison reentry in New Jersey. The New Jersey reentry roundtable. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
52.
Visher, C., & Travis, J. ( 2003). Transition from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89-113.
53.
Warren, J. ( 2009). 1 in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: The Pew Center on the States.
54.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. ( 2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy .
55.
Wilson, J.A., & Davis, R.C. ( 2006). When good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 301-337.
56.
Zhang, S., Roberts, R., & Callanan, V. ( 2006). Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 551-571.
