One of the most significant changes to juvenile justice processing in recent decades has been blended sentencing. Unlike traditional juvenile court or adult court waiver processes, blended sentencing statutes provide authority to juvenile or adult court judges to sanction delinquent offenders with juvenile and adult dispositions. Although state variations abound, most blended sentencing schemes feature a fail-safe postadjudication stage where decisions are made to suspend or invoke the adult portion of the original blended sentence. Based on data from 1,504 serious and violent male delinquents sanctioned via a blended sentencing statute, this study explored the relationship of a battery of delinquent background, commitment offense, and postadjudication institutional misconduct variables on decisions to invoke or suspend the adult portion of a blended sentence. Results of the analysis revealed that commitment offense type, age at commitment and, to a lesser extent, institutional misconduct behavior weighed most heavily in decisions to invoke the adult portion of the blended sentence.
Bishop, D. ( 2000). Juvenile offenders in the adult criminal justice system . In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 81-165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bishop, D., & Frazier, C. ( 2000). Consequences of transfer. In J. Fagan & F. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 227-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Bishop, D., Frazier, C., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Winner, L. ( 1996). The transfer of juvenile to criminal court: Does it make a difference. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 171-191.
4.
Burrow, J. ( 2008a). Examining the influence of Matza’s principles of justice and their impact on reverse waiver decisions: Has kadi-(in)justice survived? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 59-82.
5.
Burrow, J. ( 2008b). Reverse waiver and the effects of legal, statutory, and secondary legal factors on sentencing outcomes for juvenile offenders . Crime & Delinquency, 54, 34-64.
6.
Butts, J., & Mitchell, O. ( 2000). Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. In C. Friel (Ed.), Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp. 167-214). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice .
7.
Dawson, R. ( 1988). The third justice system: The new juvenile-criminal system of determinate sentencing for the youthful violent offender in Texas . St. Mary’s Law Journal, 19, 943-1015.
8.
Fagan, J. ( 1996). The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law and Policy, 18, 77-114.
9.
Fritsch, E., Caeti, T., & Hemmens, C. ( 1996). Spare the needle but not the punishment: The incarceration of waived youth in Texas prisons. Crime & Delinquency , 42, 593-609.
10.
Fritsch, E., Hemmens, C., & Caeti, T. ( 1996). Violent youth in juvenile and adult court: An assessment of sentencing strategies in Texas. Law & Policy , 18, 115-136.
11.
Griffin, P. ( 2008). Different from adults: An updated analysis of juvenile transfer and blended sentencing laws, with recommendations for reform . Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice .
12.
Howell, J. ( 1996). Juvenile transfers to the criminal justice system: State-of-the-art . Law and Policy, 18, 17-60.
13.
Howell, J. ( 2003). Diffusing research into practice using the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 219-245.
14.
Jordan, K., & Freiburger, T. (2009). Examining the impact of race and ethnicity on the sentencing of juvenile in the adult court. Criminal Justice Policy Review. doi:10.1177/0887403409354738
15.
Jordan, K., & Myers, D. ( 2007). The decertification of transferred youth: Examining the determinants of reverse waiver. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 188-206.
16.
Kupchik, A. ( 2007). The correctional experiences of youth in adult and juvenile prisons. Justice Quarterly, 24, 247-270.
17.
Kupchik, A., Fagan, J., & Liberman, A. ( 2003). Punishment, proportionality, and jurisdictional transfer of adolescent offenders: A test of the leniency gap hypothesis. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 14, 57-83.
18.
Kurlychek, M., & Johnson, B. ( 2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology , 42, 485-517.
19.
Lane, J., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. ( 2002). Adult versus juvenile sanctions: Voice of incarcerated youths. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 431-455.
20.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. ( 1999). Juvenile transfers in Florida: The worst of the worst?University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy , 10, 277-312.
21.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Lane, J., Bishop, D., & Frazier, C. ( 2005). Juvenile offenders and adult felony recidivism: The impact of transfer. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28, 59-77.
22.
Lemmon, J., Austin, T., Verrecchia, P., & Fetzer, M. ( 2005). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on statutory exclusion of juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3, 214-234.
23.
Long, J., & Freese, J. ( 2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
24.
Marczyk, G., Heilbrun, K., Lander, T., & DeMatteo, D. ( 2005). Juvenile decertification: Developing a model for classification and prediction. Criminal Justice & Behavior , 32, 278-301.
25.
Mears, D. ( 1998). Evaluation issues confronting juvenile justice sentencing reforms: A case study of Texas. Crime & Delinquency , 44, 443-463.
26.
Mears, D. ( 2003). A critique of waiver research: Critical next steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juveniles to the criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 156-172.
27.
Mears, D., & Field, S. ( 2000). Theorizing sanctioning in a criminalized juvenile court . Criminology, 38, 983-1020.
28.
Myers, D. ( 2003). Adult crime, adult time: Punishing violent youth in the adult criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 173-197.
29.
Piquero, A., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Haapanen, R. ( 2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology , 40, 137-168.
30.
Piquero, A., MacDonald, J., & Parker, K. ( 2002). Race, local life circumstances, and criminal activity . Social Science Quarterly, 83, 654-670.
31.
Podkopacz, M., & Feld, B. ( 1996). The end of the line: An empirical study of judicial waiver . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 449-492.
32.
Podkopacz, M., & Feld, B. ( 2001). The back-door to prison: Waiver reform, blended sentencing, and the law of unintended consequences. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91, 997-1071.
33.
Redding, R. ( 2003). The effects of adjudicating and sentencing juveniles as adults: Research and policy implications. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 128-155.
34.
Redding, R. ( 2008). Juvenile transfer laws: An effective deterrent to delinquency . Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
35.
Redding, R., & Fuller, E. ( 2004). What do juvenile offenders know about being tried as adults? Implications for deterrence. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 55, 35-45.
36.
Redding, R., & Howell, J. ( 2000). Blended sentencing in American juvenile courts . In J. Fagan & F. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 145-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Salekin, R., Rogers, R., & Ustad, K. ( 2001). Juvenile waiver to adult criminal courts: Prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 381-408.
38.
Sanborn, J. ( 2003). Hard choices or obvious ones: Developing policy for excluding youth from juvenile court. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice , 1, 198-214.
39.
Smallheer, R. ( 1999). Sentence blending and the promise of rehabilitation: Bringing the juvenile justice system full circle. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 259-289.
40.
Trulson, C., DeLisi, M., Caudill, J., Belshaw, S., & Marquart, J. (in press). Delinquent careers behind bars. Criminal Justice Review.
41.
Trulson, C., DeLisi, M., & Marquart, J. ( 2009). Institutional misconduct, delinquent background, and re-arrest frequency among serious and violent delinquent offenders. Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128709340224
42.
Ulmer, J., & Johnson, B. ( 2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-178.
