This article draws on a recent study that examined the impact of target hardening on domestic burglary in the City of Liverpool, England, between July 2005 and December 2007. Individual property-level data, from a range of sources, were collated for each residential property in the City enabling details about burglaries (timing, location, modus operandi) to be linked to data on the nature, timing, and location of target-hardening activity. Properties were grouped according to the presence or absence of burglary and/or target hardening at each address and the sequence of events. Groups included properties burgled, target hardened, and not subsequently burgled; no prior burglary, target hardened, subsequent burglary; burgled, never target hardened, and other combinations.The results suggest that property-level data give a richer picture of the relationship between burglary and target hardening than is possible using aggregate data at an area level.
Anderson, D., Chenery, S., & Pease, K. ( 1995). Biting back: Tackling repeat burglary and car crime ( Crime Detection and Prevention Series No. 58). London: Home Office.
2.
Ashton, J., Brown, B., Senior, B., & Pease, K. ( 1998). Repeat victimization: Offender accounts. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 3, 269-279.
3.
Bottoms, A., & Wiles, P. ( 1988). Crime and housing policy: A framework for crime prevention analysis. In T. Hope & M. Shaw (Eds.), Communities and crime reduction (pp. 84-98). London: HMSO.
4.
Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D., & Hirschfield, A. (2004a). Closing off opportunities for crime: An evaluation of alley-gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10, 283-308.
5.
Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D., & Hirschfield, A. (2004b). The measurement of crime prevention intensity and its impact on levels of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 419-440.
6.
Bowers, K.J., Lab, S.P., & Johnson, S.D. ( 2008). Evaluating crime prevention: The potential of using individual-level matched control designs. Policing, 2, 218-225.
7.
Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1993). Environmental routine and situation: Towards a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 5, 259-294.
8.
Chenery, S., Holt, J., & Pease, K. ( 1997). Biting back II: Reducing repeat victimization in Huddersfield (Crime Detection and Prevention Series No. 82). London: Home Office .
Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
11.
Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. ( 1986). The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer Verlang.
12.
Coupe, R.T., & Blake, L. ( 2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44, 431-463.
13.
Duborg, R., Hamed, J., & Thorns, J. ( 2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals . London: Home Office.
14.
Ekblom, P., & Sidebottom, A. (2008). What do you mean, "Is it secure?" Redesigning language to be fit for the task of assessing the security of domestic and personal electronic goods. European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, 14, 61-87.
15.
Everson, S., & Pease, K. ( 2001). Crime against the same person and place: Detection opportunity and offender targeting. In G. Farrell & K. Pease (Eds.), Repeat victimization (pp. 199-220). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
16.
Farrell, G. ( 2005). Progress and prospects in the prevention of repeat victimization . In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 143-170). Collumpton , UK: Willan.
17.
Groff, E., & La Vigne, N., (2001). Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 257-278.
18.
Hamilton-Smith, N., & Kent, A. ( 2005). Preventing domestic burglary. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety. (pp. 415-457). Collumpton, UK: Willan.
19.
Hirschfield, A. ( 2004). The impact of the reducing burglary initiative in the north of England (Home Office Online Report40/04). London: Home Office.
20.
Hirschfield, A., & Newton, A. ( 2008). The crime-crime prevention relationship: A Manchester case study. Built Environment, 34, 104-120.
21.
Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K.J., Jordan, P., Mallender, J., Davidson, N., & Hirschfield, A. (2004). Estimating crime reduction outcomes: How many crimes were prevented? Evaluation, 10, 327-348.
22.
Millie, A. ( 2008). Vulnerability and risk: Some lessons from the U.K. reducing burglary initiative. Police Practice & Research, 9, 183-198.
23.
Millie, A., & Hough, M. ( 2004). Assessing the impact of the reducing burglary initiative in Southern England and Wales. Home Office Online Report42/24, London: Home Office.
24.
Nee, C., & Taylor, M. ( 2000). Residential burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A situational perspective. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 105-116.
25.
Newton, A.D., Rogerson, M., & Hirschfield, A. (2008). Relating target hardening to burglary risk: Experiences from Liverpool. Papers From the British Criminology Conference: An Online Journal Published by the British Society of Criminology, 8, 153-174.
26.
Pease, K. ( 1998). Repeat victimization: Taking stock (Crime Prevention & Detection Paper 90). London: Home Office.
27.
Townsley, M., Homel, R., & Chaseling, J. ( 2003). Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis . British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615-633.
28.
Trickett, A., Osborn, D.R., Seymour, J., & Pease, K. ( 1992). What is different about high crime areas? British Journal of Criminology, 32, 81-89.
29.
Tseloni, A.M., & Pease, K. ( 2003). Repeat personal victimization: "Flags" or "boosts"? British Journal of Criminology, 43, 196-212.
30.
Walker, A., Kershaw, C., & Nicholas, S. ( 2009). Crime in England and Wales 2008/9. London: Home Office.
31.
Wright, R.T., Logie, R.H., & Decker, S.H. ( 1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 39-53.
