A number of researchers have concluded that federal assistance to local law enforcement agencies reduces serious crime. This article critiques such studies, makes recommendations for improvement, and then implements the recommendations using data from a 12-year panel of approximately 5,000 cities, focusing in particular on the relationship between Local Law Enforcement Block Grants and serious crime. Results suggest researchers should be cautious in attributing crime reductions to grant funding programs.
Anderson, D.A. ( 1999). The aggregate burden of crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 611-642.
2.
Bauer, L. ( 2004). Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program, 1996-2004 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
3.
Baum, C.F., Schaffer, M.E., & Stillman, S. ( 2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing . Stata Journal, 3, 1-31.
4.
Beck, N., & Katz, J.N. ( 1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634-647.
5.
De Boef, S., & Keele, L. ( 2006). Taking time seriously: Dynamic regression models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Society, Tallahasee, FL.
6.
DiTella, R., & Schargrodsky, E. (2004). Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94, 115-133.
7.
Dunworth, T., Haynes, P., & Saiger, A.J. ( 1997). National assessment of the Byrne formula grant program: Research in brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
8.
Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. ( 1999). National evaluation of weed and seed: Research in brief . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
9.
Evans, W.M., & Owens, E. ( 2007). COPS and crime. Journal of Public Economics , 91, 181-201.
10.
Froot, K.A. ( 1989). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 333-355.
11.
Gist, N.E. ( 2000). A history of the Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program: Supporting local solutions to crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
12.
Government Accountability Office. (2003). Technical assessment of Zhao and Thurman’s 2001 evaluation of the effects of COPS grants on crime. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Community policing grants: COPS Grants were a modest contributor to declines in crime in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Huber, P.J. ( 1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221-223). Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Klick, J., & Tabarrok, A. ( 2005). Using terror alert levels to estimate the effect of police on crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 267-279.
16.
Kovandzic, T.V., & Sloan, J.J. ( 2002). Police levels and crime rates revisited: A county-level analysis from Florida (1980-1998). Journal of Criminal Justice , 30, 65-76.
17.
Levitt, S.D. ( 1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. American Economic Review, 87, 270-290.
18.
Levitt, S.D. ( 2002). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime: Reply. American Economic Review , 92, 1244-1250.
19.
Lilley, D., & Boba, R. ( 2008). A comparison of outcomes associated with two key law enforcement grant programs. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 19, 438-465.
20.
Loftin, C., & McDowall, D. ( 1982). The police, crime, and economic theory: An assessment . American Sociological Review, 47, 393-401.
McCrary, J. ( 2002). Do electoral cycles in police hiring really help us estimate the effect of police on crime? Comment. American Economic Review, 92, 1236-1243.
23.
Muhlhausen, D.B. ( 2001). Do community oriented policing services grants affect violent crime rates?Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
24.
Nickel, S. ( 1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417-1426.
25.
Pratt, T.C., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta analysis (pp. 373-450). In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 32. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Rogers, W.H. ( 1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19-23.
27.
Sargan, J. ( 1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26, 393-415.
28.
Staiger, D., & Stock, J.H. ( 1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments . Econometrica, 65, 557-586.
29.
U.S. Justice Department. (2007). Community Capacity Development Office FY 10 Weed and Seed Communities Competitive Program guide and application kit. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
White, H. ( 1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-830.
31.
Williams, R.L. ( 2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645-646.
32.
Wooldridge, J.M. ( 2001). Applications of Generalized Method of Moments estimation . Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 87-100.
33.
Wooldridge, J.M. ( 2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Worrall, J.L. ( 2008). The effect of local law enforcement block grants on serious crime. Criminology and Public Policy, 7, 325-350.
Yin, R.K., Pate, A.M., Kim, D., Sheppard, D., Warner, E., Cannon, M., et al. (2001). National evaluation of the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program: Phase one final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
37.
Zhao, J., Scheider, M.C., & Thurman, Q.C. ( 2002). Funding community policing to reduce crime: Have COPS grants made a difference? Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 7-32.
38.
Zhao, J., & Thurman, Q.C. ( 2001). A national evaluation of the effect of COPS grants on crime from 1994 to 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
