Several studies have examined the effects of race and ethnicity on the sentences of adult offenders in the criminal court. The findings of these studies often show that race and ethnicity influence defendants’ sentencing outcomes. Few studies, however, have examined how race and ethnicity influence juvenile defendants sentenced in the adult criminal justice system. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to determine how race and ethnicity affect the sentences of juveniles, utilizing a national dataset of youth convicted of a felony in adult court. The findings suggest that race and ethnicity do impact the sentencing outcomes of convicted youthful offenders. In addition, the results suggest that the combination of race and other factors (i.e., interactions) has an effect on sentencing. Implications for subsequent research also are discussed.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
Barnes, C.W., & Kingsnorth, R. (1996). Race, drug, and criminal sentencing: Hidden effects of the criminal law. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), 39-55.
3.
Brennan, P.K. ( 2006). Sentencing female misdemeanants: An examination of the direct and indirect effects of race/ethnicity. Justice Quarterly , 23, 60-95.
4.
Burruss, G., & Kempf-Leonard, K. (2002). The questionable advantage of defense counsel in juvenile court. Justice Quarterly, 19, 37-67.
5.
Bushway, S.D., & Piehl, A.M. ( 2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35, 733-764.
6.
Chiricos, T.G., & Crawford, C. ( 1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281-309). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994-1011.
8.
Desmond, M., & López Turley, R.N. (2009). The role of familism in explaining the Hispanic-White college application gap. Social Problems, 56, 311-334.
9.
Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1230.
10.
Feld, B.C. ( 1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of juvenile court . New York: Oxford University Press .
11.
Fox, J.A., & Swatt, M.L. ( 2009). Multiple imputation of the supplementary homicide reports, 1976-2005. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 51-77.
12.
Freiburger, T.L., & Hilinski, C.M. (in press). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency.
13.
Harrington, M.P., & Spohn, C. ( 2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36-63.
14.
Holleran, D., & Spohn, C. ( 2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research, Criminology, 42, 211-240.
15.
Holmes, M.D., & Daudistel, H.C. (1984). Ethnicity and justice in the Southwest: The sentencing of Anglo, Black, and Mexican origin defendants . Social Science Quarterly, 65, 265-277.
16.
Johnson, B.D. ( 2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449-490.
17.
Jordan, K.L. ( 2006). Violent youth in adult court: The decertification of transferred offenders. New York: LFB Scholarly Publications.
18.
Jordan, K.L., & Myers, D.L. (in press). Juvenile transfer and deterrence: Re-examining the effectiveness of a "get tough" policy. Crime & Delinquency.
19.
Kramer, J.H., & Ulmer, J.T. ( 2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court "corrections" to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 897-932.
20.
Kupchik, A. ( 2006). The decision to incarcerate in juvenile and criminal courts. Criminal Justice Review, 31, 309-336.
21.
Kurlychek, M.C., & Johnson, B.D. ( 2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485-517.
22.
LaFree, G.D. ( 1985). Official reactions to Hispanic defendants in the Southwest . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 213-237.
23.
Mears, D.P. ( 2003). A critique of waiver research: Critical next steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juveniles to the criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 156-172.
Mitchell, O. ( 2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.
26.
Myers, D.L. ( 2003). Adult crime, adult time: Punishing violent youth in the adult criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 173-197.
27.
Myers, D.L. ( 2005). Boys among men: Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults . Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
Rainville, G. ( 2008). Juveniles transferred to criminal courts: Is their sentence dependent on how they got there? Criminal Justice Policy Review , 19, 301-313.
29.
Rubin, D. ( 1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Schafer, J.L. ( 1999). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model [Computer software]. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
31.
Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. ( 2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
32.
Spohn, C. ( 1999).Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead ? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 365-399.
33.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of felony offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
34.
Spohn C., & Holleran, D. ( 2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
35.
Steffensmeier, D. ( 1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 344-358.
36.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2000). Ethnicity and sentencing in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
37.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-White-Black comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
38.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctions? Sentences for male and female, White, Black, and Hispanic defendants . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
39.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. ( 1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology , 31, 411-446.
40.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
41.
Ulmer, J.T., & Johnson, B. ( 2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-178.
42.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Hispanic population of the United States. Retrieved September 29, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/Hispanic.html
43.
Wooldredge, J.D. ( 1998). Analytical rigor and studies of disparities and criminal case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 155-179.
44.
Zatz, M.S. ( 2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class in court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In Criminal justice2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 503-552). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
