Geographic Aspects of Sex Offender Residency Restrictions

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 47-87.

Agnew, R. (2006). General strain theory. In S. Henry & M. Lanier (Eds.), The essential criminology reader (pp. 155-163). Boulder, CO : Westview.

Brantingham, P.J. , & Brantingham, P.L. (1991). Environmental criminology . Prospect Heights, IL: Waverly .

Bursik, R.J. , & Grasmick, H.G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime . New York: Lexington.

Cho, G. (2005). Geographic information systems: Mastering the legal issues. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Cloward, R. , & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.

Cohen, A. (1955). Delinquent boys. New York: Free Press.

Cohen, L.E. , & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004 ). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.

Duwe, G. , Donnay, W. , & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 484-504.

Grubesic, T.H. , Mack, E. , & Murray, A.T. (2007). Geographic exclusion: Spatial analysis for evaluating the implications of Megan's Law. Social Science Computer Review , 25, 143-162.

Herbert, S. (2005). The trapdoor of community. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 95, 850-864.

Iowa County Attorneys Association. (2006, January). Statement on sex offender residency restrictions in Iowa . Des Moines: Author.

Langan, P.A. , Schmitt, E.L. , & Durose, M.R. (2003, November). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

LaVigne, N. , Visher, C. , & Castro, J. (2004). Chicago prisoners'experiences returning home. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Levenson, J.S. , & Cotter, L.P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-180.

Levenson, J. , & Hern, A. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community re-entry. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 59-73.

Losel, F. , & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology , 1, 117-147.

Meredith, T. , Speir, J. , Johnson, S. , & Hull, H. (2003). Enhancing parole decision-making through the automation of risk assessment. Atlanta, GA: Applied Research Services.

Merton, R.K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682.

Messner, S. , & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Crime and the American dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2003 ). Level three sex offenders residential placement issues. St. Paul: Author.

Mustaine, E.E. , Tewksbury, R. , & Stengel, K.M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329-350.

Nieto, M. , & Jung, D. (2006, August). The impact of residency restrictions on sex offenders and correctional management practices: A literature review. Sacramento: California Research Bureau.

Sampson, R. , Raudenbush, S. , & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 22, 918-924.

Shaw, C. , & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Snyder, H.N. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime . Criminology, 25, 893-909.

Stengel, K.M. , Tewksbury, R. , & Mustaine, E.E. (2008). Examining rates of sexual offenses from a routine activities perspective. Victims & Offenders, 3(1), 75-85.

Tenner, E. (2003). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Vintage.

Tewksbury, R. , & Lees, M.B. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum , 26, 309-334.

Tewksbury, R. , & Mustaine, E.E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders? An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 61-75.

Walker, J.T. (2007). Eliminate residency restrictions for sex offenders . Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 863-870.

Walker, J.T. , Golden, J.W. , & VanHouten, A.C. (2001). The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activity approach. Justice Research and Policy, 3, 15-33.

Weisburd, D. , Bushway, S. , Lum, C. , & Yang, S.E. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology , 42, 283-320.

Wilson, R.E. (2007). The impact of software on crime mapping: An introduction to a special journal issue of Social Science Computing Review on crime mapping . Social Science Computing Review, 25, 135-142.

Zandbergen, P.A. , & Hart, T.C. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 1-24.