Crime and sentencing are key issues confronting policy makers. Overcrowding and escalating corrections budgets have brought increased public attention on the criminal justice system. In light of this increased focus, it is important to examine what issues concern policy makers in corrections and sentencing policy decisions. The purpose of this research is to explore how Florida legislators consider crime causation, crime control, and support for rehabilitation when deciding on corrections and sentencing policy. This study also offers an initial and exploratory glance into whether policy makers consider inmate behavior and public fear when making policy decisions. Findings suggest that legislators in Florida support imprisonment as well as rehabilitation, believe in using policy to control inmate behavior, and hesitate to alter public policy toward more leniency even if public fear decreases.
Akers, R., & Sellers, C. (2004). Criminological theory: Introduction, evaluation, and application (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
2.
Berk, R., & Rossi, P. (1977). Prison reform and state elites. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
3.
Bourns, W., Veneziano, C., & Veneziano, L. (2005). A study of criminal justice policymakers' perspectives: The forgotten component in boot camp programs and goals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 113-118.
4.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008). Crime and victims statistics. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict.htm
5.
Bynum, T., Greene, J., & Cullen, F. (1986). Correlates of legislative crime control ideology . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1, 253-267.
6.
Cobb, R., & Elder, R. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Cullen, F. (1982). State of Illinois legislators' crime policy survey . Unpublished survey.
8.
Cullen, F., Bynum, T., Garrett, K., & Greene, J. (1985). Legislator ideology and criminal justice policy: Implications from Illinois. In E. Fairchild & V. Webb (Eds.), The politics of criminal justice (pp. 57-76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Cullen, F., Clark, G., Cullen, J., & Mathers, R. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
10.
Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections . In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Cullen, F., Gilbert, K., & Cullen, J. (1983). Implementing determinate sentencing in Illinois: Conscience and convenience. Criminal Justice Review, 8, 1-16.
12.
Cullen, F., Golden, K., & Cullen, J. (1983). Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 1-13.
13.
Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
14.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Crime in the United States. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_01a.html
15.
Flanagan, T., Brennan, P.G., & Cohen, D. (1993). Conservatism and capital punishment in the state capitol: Lawmakers and the death penalty. The Prison Journal , 72, 37-56.
16.
Flanagan, T., McGarrell, E., & Lizotte, A. (1989). Ideology and crime control policy positions in a state legislature. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 87-101.
17.
Florida Department of Corrections. (2007). 10-20-LIFE- mandatory minimum prison sentences. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/oth/10-20-life/index.html
18.
Florida Department of Corrections. (2008). Mission. Retrieved February 3, 2008, from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/
19.
Florida Governor. (2008). Safety first. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from http://www.flgov.com/safety
20.
Florida House of Representatives. (2006). Retrieved November 12, 2006, from http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/
21.
Gottfredson, S., & Taylor, R. (1984). Public policy and prison populations: Measuring opinions about reform. Judicature, 68, 190-201.
22.
Gottfredson, S., & Taylor, R. (1987). Attitudes of correctional policymakers and the public. In S. Gottfredson & S. McConville (Eds.), America's correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy (pp. 57-75). New York: Greenwood.
23.
Grinberg, E. (2007, March 13). Sex offender convicted of murdering 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford, could face death. Court TV. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.courttv.com/trials/lunsford/030707_verdict_ctv.html
24.
The Florida Senate. (2006). Retrieved November 12, 2006, from http://www.flsenate.gov
25.
Griset, P. (2002). New sentencing laws follow old patterns: A Florida case study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 287-301.
26.
Hamm, M. (1989a). Legislator ideology and capital punishment: The special case for Indiana juveniles. Justice Quarterly, 6, 219-232.
27.
Hamm, M. (1989b). The conscience and convenience of sentencing reform in Indiana. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7, 107-125.
28.
Harrison, P., & Beck, A. (2006). Prisoners in 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
29.
Hurlburt, R. (1994). Comprehending behavioral statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
Kovandzic, T. (2001). The impact of Florida's habitual offender law on crime. Criminology, 39, 179-204.
31.
Lyday, W. (1975). State legislator perceptions of criminal justice issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
32.
McGarrell, E., & Flanagan, T. (1987). Measuring and explaining legislator crime control ideology. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 102-118.
33.
McGarrell, E., & Sandys, M. (1996). The misperception of public opinion toward capital punishment: Examining the spuriousness explanation of death penalty support . American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 500-513.
34.
The People's Budget. (2008). Policy and budget recommendations, fiscal year 2007. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from http://www.thepeoplesbudget.state.fl.us/(S(gcfehi55szsj2wfmo1p0oqu1))/bdagencies.aspx?full=1
35.
Quinney, R. (1999). Class, state, and crime. In F. Cullen & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological theory: Past to present (pp. 309-314). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
36.
Riley, P., & Rose, V. (1980). Public vs. elite opinion on correctional reform: Implications for social policy. Journal of Criminal Justice , 8, 345-356.
37.
Rochford, L., & Venable, C. (1995). Surveying a targeted population segment: The effects of endorsement on mail questionnaire response rate. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3, 86-97.
38.
Sabol, W., Couture, H., & Harrison, P. (2007). Prisoners in 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
Singleton, R., & Straits, B. (1999). Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Springer, J. (2005, November 18). Fla. mechanic faces death penalty in girl's car-wash abduction, murder. Court TV. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.courttv.com/trials/brucia/110705_background_ctv.html
41.
Stinchcombe, A., Adams, R., Heimer, C., Scheppele, K., Smith, T., & Taylor, D. (1980). Crime and punishment: Changing attitudes in America . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Welsh, W. (1993). Ideologies and incarceration: Legislator attitudes toward jail overcrowding. The Prison Journal, 73(1), 46-71.
43.
Whitehead, J., Blakenship, M., & Wright, P. (1999). Elite versus citizen attitudes on capital punishment: Incongruity between the public and policymakers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 249-258.
44.
Ziegler, S. (2006). Increasing response rates in mail surveys without increasing error. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(1), 22-31.
