The juvenile justice system has been transformed in recent years with a range of policies designed to hold youth accountable, but how does society hold this system accountable? Calls for governmental accountability are common, yet few jurisdictions can provide comprehensive information about the basic operations of juvenile justice and the effectiveness of system reforms. Most elements of the juvenile justice system operate on faith—managers and policy makers have to assume that their programs are based on sound evidence and that reform efforts are fully implemented with fidelity to their designs. Performance monitoring provides a way to address this situation, but it is unlikely to occur without a substantial commitment of resources. This article describes performance measurement and monitoring; their relevance for improving the accountability, operations, and effectiveness of juvenile justice; and three examples of how the techniques are currently being applied in the United States.
Bazemore, G. (2006). Performance measures: Measuring what really matters in juvenile justice. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute.
2.
Bernard, T.J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Blomberg, T. G., Gordon, P. W., & Yeisley, M. R. (Eds.). (2001). Data-driven juvenile justice education . Richmond, KY: National Juvenile Detention Association.
4.
Bridges, G.S., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
5.
Butts, J.A., & Adams, W. (2001). Anticipating space needs in juvenile detention and correctional facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
6.
Butts, J.A., & Halemba, G. (1996). Waiting for justice: Moving young offenders through the juvenile court process. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
7.
Butts, J.A., & Mears, D.P. (2001). Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era. Youth and Society, 33, 169-198.
8.
Butts, J.A., & Mitchell, O. (2000). Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp. 167-213). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
9.
Butts, J. A., & Roman, J. (Eds.). (2004). Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10.
Butts, J.A., & Roman, J. (2007). Changing systems: Outcomes from the RWJF Reclaiming Futures initiative on juvenile justice and substance abuse. Portland, OR: Portland State University, Reclaiming Futures National Program Office.
11.
Campbell, R. (2003). Dollars and sentences: Legislators' views on prisons, punishment, and the budget crisis. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
12.
Council for Excellence in Government. (2004 , July 28). U.S. Justice Department's "PbS" program wins government "Oscar" [Press release]. Washington, DC: Council for Excellence in Government.
13.
Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators. (2007). PbS goals, standards, outcome measures, expected practices and processes. Braintree, MA: Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators. Retrieved September 6, 2007, http://www.pbstandards.org/DocLib/PbS%20Standards_Spring%202007.pdf
14.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
15.
Fagan, J., & Zimring, F. E. (Eds.). (2000). The changing borders of juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Farabee, D. (2005). Rethinking rehabilitation: Why can't we reform our criminals?Washington, DC: AEI Press.
17.
Feld, B.C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Garry, E.M. (1997). Performance measures: What works?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
19.
Grisso, T. (2004). Double jeopardy: Adolescent offenders with mental disorders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harp, C., Bell, D., Bazemore, G., & Thomas, D. (2006). Guide to developing and implementing performance measures for the juvenile justice system. Alexandria, VA : American Prosecutors Research Institute.
Howell, J.C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Lipsey, M. W., Adams, J. L., Gottfredson, D. C., Pepper, J. V., & Weisburd, D. (Eds.). (2005). Improving evaluation of anticrime programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25.
Logan, C. (1993). Criminal justice performance measures for prisons . In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 15-59). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26.
Marion, N.E., & Oliver, W.M. (2006). The public policy of crime and criminal justice . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson .
27.
Marquette County. (2006). Juvenile justice report card: Case closing information, year ending 2006. Marquette, MI: State of Michigan, 25th Circuit Court, Family Division.
28.
Mears, D.P. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of juvenile justice reforms: A closer look at the criteria and the impacts on diverse stakeholders . Law and Policy, 22, 175-202.
29.
Mears, D.P. (2002a). The role of statistical models in planning juvenile corrections capacity. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
30.
Mears, D.P. (2002b). Sentencing guidelines and the transformation of juvenile justice in the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 6-19.
31.
Mears, D.P. (2003). A critique of waiver research: Critical next steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juveniles to the criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 156-172.
32.
Mears, D.P. (2004). Identifying adolescent substance abuse. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 185-220). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
33.
Mears, D.P. (2006). Exploring state-level variation in juvenile incarceration rates: Symbolic threats and competing explanations. The Prison Journal, 86, 470-490.
34.
Mears, D.P., Hay, C., Gertz, M., & Mancini, C. (2007). Public opinion and the foundation of the juvenile court. Criminology, 45, 223-258.
35.
Mears, D.P., & Kelly, W.R. (1999). Assessments and intake processes in juvenile justice processing: Emerging policy considerations. Crime and Delinquency , 45, 508-552.
36.
National Juvenile Defender Center. (2007). 2006 state juvenile justice legislation. Washington, DC : Author.
37.
Nissen, L.B., Butts, J.A., Merrigan, D.M., & Kraft, M.K. (2006). The RWJF Reclaiming Futures initiative: Improving substance abuse interventions for justice-involved youth. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57, 39-51.
38.
Nissen, L.B., Vanderberg, J., Embree-Bever, J., & Mankey, J. (1999). Strategies for integrating substance abuse treatment and the juvenile justice system, a practice guide. Washington, DC: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
39.
Performance-Based Standards. (2007). [Web site]. Retrieved September 6, 2007, from http://www.pbstandards.org
40.
Perry, A., McDougall, C., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (2006). Reducing crime: The effectiveness of criminal justice interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
41.
Pires, S. (2002). Building systems of care: A primer. Washington, DC: National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health.
42.
Reclaiming Futures. (2007). [Web site]. Retrieved September 6, 2007, from http://www.reclaimingfutures.org
43.
Riveland, C. (1999). Prison management trends, 1975-2025. In M. H. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 163-203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Roberts, J.V., & Stalans, L.J. (1998). Crime, criminal justice, and public opinion. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 31-57). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Singer, S.I. (1996). Merging and emerging systems of juvenile and criminal justice. Law and Policy, 18, 1-15.
47.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
48.
Thomas, D. (2006). How does the juvenile justice system measure up? Applying performance measures in five jurisdictions (Technical Assistance to the Juvenile Court Bulletin). Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
49.
Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996-97 update. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
