This article examines the impact of the Youth Criminal Justice Act of 2002 on police discretion with apprehended young offenders in Canada. Data for 1986 to 2005 from the Canadian Uniform Crime Reporting Survey are analyzed using an interrupted time series design. The Youth Criminal Justice Act was successful in achieving its objective of reducing youth court referrals by structuring police discretion. It caused a substantial change in the exercise of police discretion with apprehended youth: a substantial decrease in the use of charges and a corresponding increase in the use of alternatives to charging. The substitution of extrajudicial measures for charges occurred in all four regions of Canada and was much greater with minor offenses than with serious youth crime. Possible reasons for the success of the Youth Criminal Justice Act are discussed.
Allen, R.J. (1976). Police and substantive rulemaking-Reconciling principle and expediency. University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 125(1), 62-118.
2.
Baer, D., Grabb, E., & Johnston, W. (1993). National character, regional culture, and the values of Canadians and Americans. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 30, 13-36.
3.
Bala, N. (2003). Youth criminal justice law. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Irwin Law.
4.
Barnhorst, R. (2004). The Youth Criminal Justice Act: New directions and implementation issues. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 231-250.
5.
Bottomley, K., & Pease, K. (1986). Crime and punishment: Interpreting the data. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
6.
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (2004 ). Canadian crime statistics 2003 (Cat. No. 85-205). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.
7.
Carrington, P.J. (1995). Has violent youth crime increased? Comment on Corrado and Markwart. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 61-93.
8.
Carrington, P.J. (1998). Changes in police charging of young offenders in Ontario and Saskatchewan after 1984. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40, 153-164.
9.
Carrington, P.J. (1999). Trends in youth crime in Canada, 1977-1996. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 41, 1-32.
10.
Carrington, P.J., & Moyer, S. (1994). Trends in youth crime and police response, pre- and post-YOA. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 36, 1-28.
11.
Carrington, P.J., & Schulenberg, J.L. (with Brunelle, A., Jacob, J., & Pickles, I.). (2004). Police discretion with young offenders. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved October 13, 2006 , from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/research/carrington-schulenberg/report.html
12.
Carrington, P.J., & Schulenberg, J.L. (2005). The impact of the Youth Criminal Justice Act on police charging practices with young persons: A preliminary statistical assessment. Report to the Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/research/pcarrington-jschulenberg/index.html
13.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 81-90.
14.
Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
15.
Cordner, G.W., Scarborough, K.E., & Sheehan, R. (2004). Police administration (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
16.
Corrado, R. R., Bala, N., Linden, R., & Le Blanc, M. (Eds.). (1992). Juvenile justice in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.
17.
Corrado, R.R., & Markwart, A. (1992). The evolution and implementation of a new era of juvenile justice in Canada. In R. R. Corrado , N., Bala, R., Linden, & M. Le Blanc , (Eds.), Juvenile justice in Canada (pp. 137-227). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.
18.
Criminal Code of Canada, c. C-46 (R.S. 1985).
19.
Davis, K.C. (1969). Discretionary justice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
20.
Davis, K.C. (1971). Confining and structuring discretion: Discretionary justice. Journal of Legal Education, 23, 56-62.
21.
Davis, K.C. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul, MN: West.
22.
Department of Justice Canada. (2003). YCJA explained. Retrieved April 24, 2005, from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repository/index.html
23.
Department of Justice Canada. (2005). About youth justice. Retrieved June 28, 2007, from http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/aboutus/aboutus.html
24.
Dugan, L. (2003). Domestic violence legislation: Exploring its impact on the likelihood of domestic violence, police involvement and arrest. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 283-312.
25.
Farrington, D.P., & Bennett, T. (1981). Police cautioning of juveniles in London. British Journal of Criminology, 21, 123-135.
26.
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice. (1996). A review of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada. Report of the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice for the Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs of the House of Commons. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Justice Canada.
27.
Forcese, D.P. (1996). Policing Canadian society (2nd ed.). Scarborough, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Friedenberg, E.Z. (1980). Deference to authority: The case of Canada. White Plains, NY: Sharpe.
29.
Gabor, T. (1999). Trends in youth crime: Some evidence pointing to increases in the severity and volume of violence on the part of young people . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 41, 385-392.
30.
Gaines, L.K., & Kappeler, V.E. (2005). Policing in America (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
31.
Goldstein, H. (1977). Policing a free society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
Goldstein, J. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. Yale Law Journal, 69, 543-594.
33.
Grosman, B.A. (1975). Police command: Decisions and discretion. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Macmillan of Canada.
34.
Hackler, J., & Don, K. (1990). Estimating system biases: Crime indices that permit comparison across provinces. Canadian Journal of Criminology , 32, 243-264.
35.
Hackler, J., & Paranjape, W. (1983). Juvenile justice statistics: Mythmaking or measure of system response? Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 209-226.
36.
Hackler, J., & Paranjape, W. (1984). Official reaction to juvenile theft: Comparison across provinces. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 179-198.
37.
Hogeveen, B., & Smandych, R.C. (2001). Origins of the newly proposed Canadian Youth Criminal Justice Act: Political discourse and the perceived crisis in youth crime in the 1990s. In R. C. Smandych (Ed.), Youth justice (pp. 144-168). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt Canada.
38.
Holdaway, S. (2003). The final warning: Appearance and reality. Criminal Justice, 3, 351-367.
39.
Hornick, J.P., Caputo, T., Hastings, R., Knoll, P.J., Bertrand, L.D., Paetsch, J.J., et al. (1996). A police reference manual on crime prevention and diversion with youth. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Research Institute of Law and the Family and the Solicitor General Canada.
40.
Hudson, J., Hornick, J. P. , & Burrows, B. A. (Eds.). (1988). Justice and the young offender in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Wall & Thompson.
41.
Jacobs, J.B. (1989). Drunk driving: An American dilemma. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
John Howard Society of Ontario. (1994). Youth crime: Sorting fact from fiction (Fact Sheet #3). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: John Howard Society of Ontario .
43.
Kemp, V., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2003). Youth justice: Discretion in pre-court decision-making. In L. Gelsthorpe & N. Padfield (Eds.), Exercising discretion: Decision-making in the criminal justice system and beyond (pp. 29-49). Cullompton, England: Willan.
44.
Lipset, S.M. (1963). The value patterns of democracy: A case study in comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 28, 515-531.
45.
Lundman, R.J. (1993). Prevention and control of juvenile delinquency (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Markwart, A., & Corrado, R.R. (1995). A response to Carrington. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 74-87.
47.
Mastrofski, S.D. (2004). Controlling street-level police discretion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 593, 100-118.
48.
Mastrofski, S.D., & Ritti, R.R. (1992). You can lead a horse to water . . . : A case study of a police department's response to stricter drunk-driving laws. Justice Quarterly, 9, 465-491.
49.
McCluskey, J.D., Varano, S.P., Huebner, B.M., & Bynum, T.S. (2004). Who do you refer? The effects of a policy change on juvenile referrals. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 437-461.
50.
Moyer, S. (1996). A profile of the juvenile justice system in Canada. Report to the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Justice Canada .
51.
Platt, P.1995. Young Offenders Law in Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.
52.
Police Services Act, c. P.15, s. 42 (1), as amended (R.S.O. 1990).
53.
Poyser, S. (2004). The role of police "discretion" in Britain and an analysis of proposals for reform. The Police Journal, 77, 5-17.
54.
Roberts, J.V. (2004). Harmonizing the sentencing of young and adult offenders: A comparison of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and Part XXIII of the Criminal Code. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 301-326.
55.
Scanlon, R.L. (1986). Canadian crime trends. In R. A. Silverman & J. J. Teevan, Jr. (Eds.), Crime in Canadian society (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.
56.
Schulenberg, J.L.2004. Policing young offenders: A multi-method analysis of variations in police discretion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
57.
Seagrave, J. (1997). Introduction to policing in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
58.
Sprott, J.R. (1996). Understanding public views of youth crime and the youth justice system. Canadian Journal of Criminology , 38, 271-290.
59.
Stenning, P.C. (1981a). Legal status of the police. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Law Reform Commission of Canada .
60.
Stenning, P.C. (1981b). Police commissions and boards in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
61.
Stenning, P.C. (1981c). The role of police boards and commissions as institutions of municipal police governance. In C. D. Shearing (Ed.), Organizational police deviance (pp. 161-208). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.
62.
Trépanier, J. (2004). What did Quebec not want? Opposition to the adoption of the Youth Criminal Justice Act in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 273-299.
63.
Walters, R. (1996). Alternatives to youth imprisonment: Evaluating the Victorian Youth Attendance Order. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 29, 166-181.
64.
Williams, G.H. (1983). Police discretion: The institutional dilemma-Who is in charge? Iowa Law Review, 68, 431-493.
65.
Williams, G.H. (1984). Police rulemaking revisited: Some new thoughts on an old problem. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 123-183.
66.
Wilson, J.Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Winterdyk, J.A. (1996). Issues and perspectives on young offenders in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt Brace Canada.
