Agricultural crime victimization—including theft of farm crops, livestock, pesticides, and equipment—and efforts to address it remain largely ignored despite the potential of such crime to adversely affect the lives and businesses of farmers and increase the costs of food to consumers. The Agricultural Crime, Technology, Information, and Operations Network (ACTION) initiative, located in California's central valley, was recently developed to combat such crime. The authors present findings from a process and outcome evaluation of this program. The findings are limited by the design of the study but nonetheless suggest that efforts to increase guardianship measures among farmers (e.g., marking equipment and livestock and using surveillance equipment), to “harden targets” (e.g., locking tractors and storing chemicals in locked storage sheds), and to arrest and prosecute offenders may help reduce agricultural crime victimization.
Abaidoo, S., & Dickinson, H. (2002). Alternative and conventional agricultural paradigms: Evidence from farming in southwest Saskatchewan. Rural Sociology , 67, 114-131.
2.
Akers, R.L., & Sellers, C. (2004). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
3.
Allison, P.D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
4.
Ballweg, J. (1991). Testing TDM modifications with mail surveys during a southern farm study: A research note. SouthernRural Sociology , 8, 51-58.
5.
Barclay, E. (2001). A review of the literature on agricultural crime. New South Wales, Australia: University of New England.
6.
Barclay, E., & Donnermeyer, J.F. (2002). Property crime and crime prevention on farms in Australia. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: AnInternational Journal, 4, 47-61.
7.
Barham, B.L., Foltz, J.D., Jackson-Smith, D., & Moon, S. (2004). The dynamics of agricultural biotechnology adoption: Lessons from rBST use in Wisconsin, 1994-2001. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 61-72.
8.
Barnett, C., & Mencken, F.C. (2002). Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in nonmetropolitan counties. Rural Sociology , 67, 372-393.
9.
Bean, T.L., & Lawrence, L.D. (1978). Crime on farms in Hampshire County, West Virginia. Morgantown : West Virginia University.
10.
Berk, R.A. (2005). Knowing when to fold 'em: An essay on evaluating the impact of ceasefire, compstat, and exile. Criminology andPublic Policy, 4, 451-465.
11.
Blumstein, A. (1996). Interaction of criminological research and public policy. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 12, 349-362.
12.
California Agriculture Statistics Service. ( 2004). Summary of county agricultural commissioners' reports, 2002-2003. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/ca
13.
California Criminal Justice Statistics Center. ( 2005). Statistics by city and county, 1993-2003. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/datatabs.htm
14.
Clarke, R.V., & Felson, M. (1993a). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 1-15). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
15.
Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (Eds.). (1993b). Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
16.
Cleland, C.L. (1990). Crime and vandalism on farms in Tennessee: Farmer opinions about and experience with. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
17.
Cullen, F.T., & Paul Gendreau . (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
18.
Deeds, J., Frese, W., Hitchner, M., & Solomon, M. (1992). Farm crime in Mississippi. Starkville: Mississippi State University.
19.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
20.
Donnermeyer, J.F. (1987). Crime against farm operations. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
21.
Donnermeyer, J.F., & Barclay, E. (2005). The policing of farm crime. Police Practice and Research, 6, 5-19.
Eck, J.E. (2002). Preventing crime at places. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington , B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 241-294). New York: Routledge .
24.
Farmer, F.L., & Voth, D.E. (1989). Ecological correlates of farm victimization in Arkansas. Fayetteville: ArkansasAgricultural Experiment Station.
25.
Felson, M. (1998). Crime and everyday life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
26.
Gibbs, J.P. (1997). Seven dimensions of the predictive power of sociological theories. National Journal of Sociology, 11, 1-28.
27.
Goldstein, H. (1987). Toward community-oriented policing: Potential basic requirements, and threshold questions. Crime & Delinquency , 33, 6-30.
28.
Grinc, R.M. (1994). “Angels in marble”: Problems in stimulating community involvement in community policing. Crime & Delinquency , 40, 437-468.
29.
Heckman, J.J., & Smith, J.A. (1995). Assessing the case for social experiments. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 85-110.
30.
Hernandez, N. (2005, November 3). $75,000 in bull semen is stolen from Frederick farm. Washington Post, p. B3.
31.
Hope, T. (1995). Community crime prevention. In M. H. Tonry & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches in crime prevention (pp. 21-89). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Huber, P.J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221-233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Kolata, G. (2002, July 9). Citing risks, U.S. will halt study of drugs for hormones. New York Times, p. A1.
34.
Lieberson, S. (1985). Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
35.
Lobao, L., & Meyer, K. (2001). The great agricultural transition: Crisis, change, and social consequences of twentieth century U.S. farming. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 103-124.
36.
Lobao, L., & Meyer, K. (2004). Farm power without farmers. Contexts , 3, 12-21.
37.
Malone, J. (2005, April 12). Farm thefts are on the rise. The Courier-Journal, p. A1.
38.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Nagin, D.S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research , 23, 1-42.
40.
National Community Crime Prevention Programme. ( 2004). Crime prevention for farms. Canberra : Commonwealth of Australia.
41.
Osgood, D.W., Finken, L.L., & McMorris, B.J. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 18, 319-347.
42.
Osgood, D.W., McMorris, B.J., & Potenza, M.T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 18, 267-296.
43.
Peak, K.J., & Glensor, R.W. (2004). Community policing and problem solving: Strategies and practices (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Peale, K.O. (1990). Crime and vandalism on farms in Kentucky. Frankfort: Kentucky State University. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2003). Intelligence-led policing. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
45.
Rossi, P.H. (1980). The challenge and opportunities of applied social research. American Sociological Review, 45, 889-904.
Saltiel, J., Gilchrist, J., & Harvie, R. (1992). Concern about crime among Montana farmers and ranchers. Rural Sociology, 57, 535-545.
48.
SAS Institute. (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
49.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (Eds.). (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
50.
Skogan, W. G. (Ed.). (2003). Community policing: Can it work?Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
51.
Sugden, G. (1999). Farm crime: Out of sight, out of mind: A study of crime on farms in the county of Rutland, England. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: AnInternational Journal, 1, 29-36.
52.
Swanson, C.R., Chamelin, N.C., & Territo, L. (2002). Criminal investigation. Boston : McGraw-Hill.
53.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2004). 2002 census of agriculture (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
54.
Weisburd, D., & McEwen, T. (Eds.). (1998). Crime mapping and crime prevention. New York: Criminal Justice Press.
55.
Weisheit, R.A., & Donnermeyer, J.F. (2000). Change and continuity in crime in rural America. In G. LaFree (Eds.), The nature of crime: Continuity and change (pp. 309-357). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
56.
Wells, L.E., & Weisheit, R.A. (2004). Patterns of rural and urban crime: A county-level comparison. Criminal Justice Review , 29, 1-22.
57.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica , 48, 817-830.
58.
Wolf, R.V., & Worrall, J.L. (2004). Lessons from the field: Ten community prosecution leadership profiles. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute.
59.
Wooldredge, J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
