Legal scholars have used the terms mala prohibita and mala in se to draw the distinction between legally proscribed and morally proscribed offenses. The former are those offenses that are wrong simply because there exist formal, codified rules prohibiting them. Efforts to define mala in se, on the other hand, have resulted in vague, often conflicting meanings that leave the analyst with little but examples to serve as definitions. As a result, some have argued that the distinctions mala in se and mala prohibita be abandoned altogether. If one examines mala in se from an equity theoretical viewpoint, incorporating the concepts of intent and harm, it may be possible to arrive at a more understandable and useful concept.
Adenaes, J. (1966). The general preventive effects of punishment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 114, 949-983.
2.
Albanese, J. S. (2002). Criminal justice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Al-Thakeb, F., & Scott, J. E. (1981). The perceived seriousness of crime in the Middle East. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 5, 129-143.
4.
Arendt, H. (1994). Some questions of moral philosophy. Social Research, 61, 739-764.
5.
Baumeister, R. F., & Campbell, W. K. (1999). The intrinsic appeal of evil: Sadism, sensational thrills, and threatened egotism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 210-221.
6.
Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768-813.
7.
Beccaria, C. (1872). An essay on crimes and punishments. Albany, NY: W. C. Little.
8.
Bedau, H. A. (1978). Retribution and the theory of punishment. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 601-620.
9.
Black, H. C., Nolan, J. M., & Nolan-Haley, J. M. (1990). Black’s law dictionary (6thed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
10.
Blackstone, W. (1941). Commentaries on the laws of England (W. H. Brown & B. C. Gavit, Eds.). Washington, DC: Washington Law Book Co.
11.
Bohm, R. M., & Haley, K. N. (2002). Introduction to criminal justice (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
12.
Buckley, L. B., McGinnis, J. H., & Petrunik, M. G. (1992). Police perceptions of education as an entitlement to promotion: An equity theory perspective. American Journal of Police, 12, 77-100.
13.
Chambliss, W., & Seidman, R. (1971). Law, order, and power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
Cole, G. (1986). The American system of criminal justice. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
Cordner, G. W. (1978). A review of work motivation theory and research for the police manager. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6, 286-292.
16.
Duff, R. A. (2002). Crime, prohibition, and punishment. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19, 97-108.
17.
Fagin, J. A. (2003). Criminal justice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
Ferguson, R. W., & Stokke, A. H. (1976). Concepts of criminal law. Boston: Holbrook.
19.
Fisher, J. D., & Baron, R. M. (1982). An equity-based model of vandalism. Population and Environment, 5, 182-200.
20.
Fox, D. R. (1993). The autonomy-community balance and the equity-law distinction: Anarchy’s task for psychological jurisprudence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 97-109.
21.
Gabor, T. (2003). The federal gun registry: An urgent need for independent, non-partisan research. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 489-498.
22.
Gehm, J. R. (1998). Victim-offender mediation programs: An exploration of practice and theoretical frameworks. Western Criminology Review, 1. Retrieved September 2, 2003, from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/gehm.html
23.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
25.
Gray, R. (1995). Eliminating the (absurd) distinction between malum in se and malum prohibitum crimes. Washington University Law Quarterly, 73, 1369-1398.
26.
Gross, H. (1979). A theory of criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Hagan, F. E. (1998). Introduction to criminology: Theories, methods, and criminal behavior (4th ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
28.
Hall, J. (1960). General principles of criminal law (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
29.
Harriman v. Northern Securities Company, 197 U.S. 244 (1905).
30.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
In re Rapier, 143 U.S. 110 (1892).
32.
Kleinig, J. (1978). Crime and the concept of harm. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 27-36.
33.
Klotter, J. (1983). Criminal law. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
34.
Kwan, Y. K., Chiu, L. L., Ip, W. C., & Kwan, P. (2002). Perceived crime seriousness: Consensus and disparity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 623-632.
35.
L’Hote v. New Orleans, 177 U.S. 587 (1900).
36.
Longshore, D. (1979). Equity in criminal justice: A test of two constructs in equity theory. Criminology, 17, 242-250.
37.
Marion, N. E. (2002). Criminal justice in America: The politics behind the system. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
38.
Perkins, R. M. (1983). Criminal liability without fault: A disquieting trend. Iowa Law Review, 68, 1067-1081.
39.
Pollack, F., & Maitland, F. (1968). The history of English law (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Prassel, F. (1979). Criminal law, justice and society. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
41.
Radzinowicz, L., & King, J. (1977). The growth of crime: The international experience. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Reckless, W. C. (1971). The crime problem. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
43.
Reid, S. T. (2003). Crime and criminology (10th ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Robinson, R. W. (1978). A model system for world crime statistics. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 2, 61-69.
45.
Sebba, L. (1984). Crime seriousness and criminal intent. Crime & Delinquency, 30, 227-244.
46.
Sellin, T., & Wolfgang, M. E. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Sieh, E. W. (1990). Diplomatic immunity: A reconsideration of an ancient concept. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 14, 269-280.
48.
Snodgrass, J. (1985). A biographical sketch and review of the work of Edwin H. Sutherland (1883-1950). History of Sociology, 6(1), 55-67.
49.
Stephen, H. J. (1845). New commentaries on the laws of England: Partly founded on Blackstone. London: Henry Butterworth.
50.
Stephen, J. F. (1976). A history of the criminal law of England. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein. (Original work published 1883)
51.
Stone v. Mississippi, 101 U.S. 814 (1879).
52.
Swigert, V. L. (1984). Crime, law, and society: The larger context. In R. F. Meier (Ed.), Major forms of crime (pp. 95-117). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
Teevan, J. J. (1976). Subjective perception of research (continued). Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 13, 155-164.
54.
Teevan, J. J. (1977). Deterrent effects of punishment for breaking and entering and theft. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 19, 121-149.
55.
Travis, L. F. III. (2001). Introduction to criminal justice (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
56.
Tremblay, P., Cordeau, G., & Ouimet, M. (1994). Under punishing offenders: Towards a theory of legal tolerance. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 36, 407-434.
57.
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35,117-125.
58.
Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority groups want from the law and legal institutions?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 215-235.
59.
United States v. Balint et al., 258 U.S. 250 (1922).
60.
United States v. Kirby, 74 U.S. 482 (1932).
61.
Utne, M. K., & Hatfield, E. (1978). Equity theory and restitution programming. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Offender restitution and theory in action (pp. 73-87). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
62.
Wagner, K., & Moriarty, L. J. (2002). Perceived fairness of drug-testing policies: An application of Levanthal’s principles of procedural justice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 219-233.
63.
Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1972). Perceived penal sanction and self-reported criminality: A neglected approach to deterrence research. Social Problems, 19, 522-540.
64.
Walker, N. (1969). Sentencing in a rational society. London: Allen Lane.
65.
Walster, E., Walster, G., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
66.
Warden, L. C. (1938). The life of Blackstone. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company.
67.
Webster’s revised unabridged dictionary. (1913). Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://humanities.uchicago.eud.orgs/ARTFL/forms_unrest/webster.form.html
68.
West, S. G., & Wickland, R. A. (1980). A primer of social psychological theories. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
69.
Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. (1985). Crime and human nature. New York: Basic Books.
70.
Wolfe, N. T. (1981). Mala in se: A disappearing doctrine?Criminology, 19, 131-143.
