Predicting Case Outcomes and Women’s Perceptions of the Legal System’s Response to Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault: Does Interaction Between Community Agencies Matter?

Abstract

The goals of the current study were to assess if domestic violence and sexual assault case outcomes and women’s perceptions of legal system response can be predicted by the level of interaction between community agencies and the level of legal system response after communities receive STOP funding. A total 1,509 interviews were conducted with women living in 26 communities. Two samples were included: (a) a Help Seeker sample recruited from nonprofit victim service agencies and their legal system agency partners, and (b) a Community sample of women ages 18 to 35 recruited through random digit dialing of households. Results show that women’s perceptions of whether community agencies were working together to assist her and her case significantly and positively related to arrests in domestic violence and sexual assault cases and to convictions in domestic violence cases. It also increases women’s beliefs that law enforcement and prosecution are effective agencies.

Keywords

domestic violence sexual assault community coordination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bureau of Justice Assistance . (1993). Family violence: Interventions for the justice system. Program brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Burt, M. R. , Harrell, A. V. , Raymond, L. J. , Iwen, B. , Schlichter, K. , Katz, B. , et al. (1999). 1999 report: Evaluation of the STOP Block Grants to combat violence against women under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Burt, M. R. , Zweig, J. , Andrews, C. , Van Ness, A. , Parikh, N. Uekert, B. K. , et al. (2001). 2001report: Evaluation of the STOP Block Grants to combat violence against women under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Burt, M. R. , Zweig, J. M. , Schlichter, K. , & Andrews, C. (2000). Victim service programs in the STOP Formula Grants Program: Services offered and interactions with other community agencies. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Burt, M. R. , Zweig, J. M. , Schlichter, K. , Kamya, S. , Katz, B. , Miller, N. , et al. (2000). 2000 report: Evaluation of the STOP Block Grants to combat violence against women under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Campbell, R. (1998). The community response to the rape victim: Victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(3), 355-379.

Campbell, R. , & Bybee, D. (1997). Emergency medical services for rape victims: Detecting the cracks in service delivery. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 3(2), 75-101.

Defina, M. P. , & Wetherbee, L. (1997). Advocacy and law enforcement: Partners against domestic violence. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66, 22-26.

Harrell, A. V. , Roehl, J. A. , & Kapsak, K. A. (1988). Family violence intervention demonstration programs evaluation: Volume II, case studies. Washington, DC: Institute for Social Analysis.

10.

Hirschel, J. D. , & Dawson, D. J. (2000). Violence against women: Synthesis of research for law enforcement officials. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

11.

Michigan Department of Community Health . (1997). Survey of Violence Against Women in Michigan. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Indianapolis, Indiana.

12.

Shepard, M. F. , Falk, D. R. , & Elliot, B. A. (2002). Enhancing coordinated community responses to reduce recidivism in cases of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(5), 551-569.

13.

Straus, M. A. , Hamby, S. L. , Boney-McCoy, S. , & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316.

14.

Sullivan, C. M. , Tan, C. , Basta, J. , Rumptz, M. , & Davidson, W. S. (1992). An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(3), 309-332.

15.

Tolman, R. M. , & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of women abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 481-495.

16.

Travis, J. , Solomon, A. L. , & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

17.

U. S. Department of Justice . (1984). Report of the Attorney General’s Task Force on Family Violence. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

Weisz, A. N. , Tolman, R. M. , & Bennett, L. (1998). An ecological study of nonresidential services for battered women within a comprehensive community protocol for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13(4), 395-415.

19.

Zweig, J. M. , & Burt, M. R. (2002). The complexities of victim research: Implementation lessons from the victim impact evaluation of nonprofit victim services in the STOP Program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

20.

Zweig, J. M. , & Burt, M. R. (2003a). The effects on victims of victim service programs funded by the STOP Formula Grants Program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

21.

Zweig, J. M. , & Burt, M. R. (2003b). Effects of interactions among community agencies on legal system responses to domestic violence and sexual assault in STOP-funded communities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14(2), 249-272.

22.

Zweig, J. M. , & Burt, M. R. (2004). Impacts of agency coordination on nonprofit domestic violence and sexual assault programs in communities with STOP Formula Grant Funding. Violence & Victims, 19(5), 93-105.

23.

Zweig, J. M. , Crockett, L. J. , Sayer, A. , & Vicary, J. R. (1999). A longitudinal examination of the consequences of sexual victimization for rural young adult women. Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 396-409.