Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The increasing application of forensic DNA analysis in the criminal justice system has led to considerable public debate. Such discussions typically center on either its use for identifying criminal offenders (and for exonerating those who have been wrongfully convicted) or legal questions concerning the proper scope of DNA evidence collection. Currently missing from these debates is an accurate estimate of the national backlog of cases that might benefit from the application of forensic DNA analysis. The authors estimate this backlog using data gathered from a nationally representative sample of local law enforcement agencies and from the total population of both state and local crime laboratories. The authors document the primary barriers identified by these agencies to the expanded use of forensic DNA analysis in the processing of criminal cases. The authors conclude with a discussion of the implications for the continued support of and increased access to forensic DNA testing by law enforcement agencies.

Keywords

forensic DNA biological evidence cold cases

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, J. , & Irwin, J. (2001). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge(3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Balding, D. J. (2000). InterpretingDNAevidence: Can probability theory help? In J. L. Gastwirth (Ed.), Statistical science in the courtroom(pp. 51-70). New York: Springer.

Baum, D. (1996). Smoke and mirrors: The war on drugs and the politics of failure. Boston: Little, Brown.

Blalock, H. M. (1972). Social statistics(Rev. ed., 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Brandl, S. , & Frank, J. (1994). The relationship between evidence, detective effort, and the dispositions of burglary and robbery investigations. American Journal of Police, 13, 149-168.

Burns, R. , & Smith, J. (1999). DNA: Fingerprint of the future? ACJS Today, 19, 1 1.

Connors, E. , Lundregan, T. , Miller, N. , & McEwan, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Cornwell, P. (2002). Portrait of a killer: Jack the Ripper—Case closed. New York: Putnam.

Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored-design method(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

10.

Dwyer, J. , Neufeld, P. , & Scheck, B. (2001). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: New American Library.

11.

Friedman, L. M. (1993). Crime and punishment in American history. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Gaines, L. K. , & Kappeler, V. E. (2002). Policing in America(4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

13.

Geisser, S. (2000). Statistics, litigation, and conduct unbecoming. In J. L. Gastwirth (Ed.), Statistical science in the courtroom(pp. 71-85). New York: Springer.

14.

Gest, T. (2001). Crime and politics: Big government's erratic campaign for law and order. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Greenwood, P. , Chaiken, J. , & Petersilia, J. (1977). The investigative process. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

16.

Hanushek, E. A. , & Jackson, J. E. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

17.

Kalton, G. (1983). Introduction to survey sampling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

18.

Krane, D. E. , Allen, R. W. , Sawyer, S. A. , Petrov, D. A. , & Hartl, D. L. (1992). Genetic differences at four DNA-typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 10583-10587.

19.

Lander, E. S. (1989). DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature, 339, 501-505.

20.

Lewontin, R. C. , & Hartl, D. L. (1991). Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science, 254, 1745-1750.

21.

Lovrich, N. P. , Gaffney, M. J. , Pratt, T. C. , Johnson, C. L. , Asplen, C. , Hurst, L. , & Schellberg, T. (2004). National forensic DNA study report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

22.

Mauer, M. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New York: New Press.

23.

Osterburg, J. , & Ward, R. (1997). Criminal investigation: A method for reconstructing the past(2nd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.

24.

Walker, S. (1999). The police in America(3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

25.

Weir, B. S. (1995). A bibliography for the use of DNA in human identification. Genetica, 96, 179-213.

26.

Weir, B. S. (1996). Invited editorial: The second national research council report on forensicDNAevidence. American Journal of Human Genetics, 59, 497-500.

27.

Weir, B. S. (2000). The consequences of defending DNA statistics. In J. L. Gastwirth (Ed.), Statistical science in the courtroom(pp. 87-97). New York: Springer.

This Isn’t CSI

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References