The United States has witnessed a steady decline in intimate partner homicides over the past 20 years, however this decline appears less dramatic when rates of victimization are disaggregated by gender, ethnicity, and marital status. This article disaggregates trends in intimate partner homicide as a way of offering a detailed measure of victim safety and as a more precise method for developing theoretical explanations for the phenomenon. It also presents an analysis of existing research on policyrelevant factors that have been hypothesized to facilitate victim safety. This analysis underscores the policy implications of findings that suggest varying levels intervention may be necessary across classes of victims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-87.
2.
Block, C. R. (2000). The ChicagoWomen’s Health Risk Study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project: New report, revised June 2, 2000. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
3.
Block, C. R., & Christakos, A. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 496-526.
4.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
5.
Browne, A., & Williams, K. R. (1989). Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law and Society Review, 23, 75-94.
6.
Browne, A., & Williams, K. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 through 1987. Gender & Society, 7, 78-98.
7.
Browne, A., Williams, K. R., & Dutton, D. G. (1999). Homicide between intimate partners: A 20-year review. In M. D. Smith, & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook and social research(pp. 149-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 81-90.
10.
DeLeon-Granados, W., & Wells, W. (2003). The validity and reliability of measures of domestic violence resources as used in intimate partner homicide research. Violence Against Women, 9, 148-162.
11.
Dobash, R. E.,& Dobash, R. P. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice interventions for domestic violence. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 252-270.
12.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
13.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2000). Exposure reduction or backlash? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate partner homicide, final report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
14.
Durham, G. L. (1998). The domestic violence dilemma: How our ineffective and varied responses reflect our conflicted views of the problem. Southern California Law Review, 71, 641-665.
15.
Eigenberg, H. M. (2001). Overview. In H. M. Eigenberg (Ed.), Woman battering in the United States: Till death do us part (pp. 1-30). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
16.
Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
17.
Felson, R.,& Messner, S. (1998). Disentangling the effects of gender and intimacy on victim precipitation in homicide. Criminology, 36, 405-423.
18.
Fox, J. A. (1998). Analysis of trends in intimate murders, 1976-1996. In L. A. Greenfeld et al. (Eds.), Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends(pp. 6-10). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19.
Garske, D. (1996). Transforming the culture: Creating safety, equality, and justice for women and girls. In R. L. Hampton, P. Jenkins, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Preventing violence in America(Vol. 4, pp. 263-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Gauthier, D. K.,& Bankston, W. B. (1997). Gender equality and the sex ratio of intimate killing. Criminology, 35, 577-600.
21.
Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Klaus, P. A., Perkins, C. A., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
Hassler, R., Johnson, B., Town, M., & Websdale, N. (1998). Lethality assessments as integral parts of providing full faith and credit guarantees. Retrieved May 1, 2000, from www.vaw.umn.edu/FFC/chapter9.html
23.
Henning, K. R., & Klesges, L. M. (2002). Utilization of counseling and support services by female victims of domestic abuse. Violence and Victims, 17, 623-636.
24.
Humphries, D. (2002). No easy answers: Public policy, criminal justice, and domestic violence. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 91-96.
25.
Johnson, B., Li, D., & Websdale, N. (1998). Florida mortality review project: Executive summary. In Legal interventions in family violence: Research findings and policy implications(pp. 40-41). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26.
Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
27.
Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H.,& Fagan, J. A. (2002). The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: Research, policy, and theory. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 51-80.
28.
Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox ofwomen arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
29.
Puzone, C. A., Saltzman, L. E., Kresnow, M. J., Thompson, M., & Mercy, J. A. (2000). National trends in intimate partner homicide: United States, 1976-1995. Violence Against Women, 6, 409-417.
30.
Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
31.
Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 1, 72-83.
32.
Rosenfeld, R. (2000). Patterns in adult homicide: 1980-1995. In A. Blumstein& J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America(pp. 130-163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Solomon, S. E., & Uchida, C. D. (2001). Murder on the front range: Domestic violencerelated deaths in Colorado Springs, final report. Silver Springs, MD: 21st Century Solutions.
34.
Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (2000). Using a longitudinal data set to further our understanding of the trajectory of intimate violence over time, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
35.
Vieraitis, L. M., & Williams, M. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities. Violence Against Women, 8, 35-63.
36.
Wells, W.,& DeLeon-Granados, W. (2002). An analysis of unexamined issues in the intimate partner homicide decline: Race, quality of victim services, offender accountability, and system accountability, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
37.
Wilson, M. I.,& Daly, M. (1992). Whokills whomin spouse killings? Onthe exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology, 30, 189-215.
38.
Zorza, J. (1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 46-72.
