This research examines the validity of an integrative theoretical approach that consists of the “liberation hypothesis” and the “focal concerns” perspective to assess the extent racial discrimination is likely to occur in misdemeanor decision making involving less serious cases. We examined decisions involving the prioritizing of cases, the granting of a continuance, conviction, and incarceration in a large county court in a southeastern state. The results fail to provide support for the belief that the likelihood of race effects is increased in cases involving less severity. Race, however, is found to influence misdemeanor decision making directly and indirectly and in interaction with a number of independent variables. The implications of the findings for future research and policy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, K.,& Cutshall, C. (1987). Refusing to prosecute minor offenses: The relative influence of legal and extralegal factors. Justice Quarterly, 4, 595595.
2.
Albonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. SocialProblems, 38, 247-266.
3.
Albonetti, C. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789-822.
4.
Baldus, D., Pulaski, C.,& Woodworth, G. (1985). Monitoring and evaluating contemporary death sentencing systems: Lessons from Georgia. U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1375-1407.
5.
Barkai, J. (1978). Lower criminal courts: The perils of procedure. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 69, 270270.
6.
Barnett, A. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentencing. U.C. DavisLaw Review, 18, 1327-1374.
7.
Belsley, D.,Kuh E.,& Welsch R. (1980). Regression diagnostics identifying influential data and source of collinearity. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Martin, S. (1983). Research on sentencing: The search forreform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
Bridges, G.,& Crutchfield, R. (1988). Law, social standing, and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces, 66, 699-724.
10.
Casper, J. (1972). American criminal justice: The defendant’s perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Champion, D. (1989). Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 253-263.
12.
Crawford, C., Chiricos, T., & Kleck, G. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481-512.
13.
Daly, K. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal ofSociology, 100, 1157-1198.
15.
Farnworth, M.,& Horan, P. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes. Social Science Research, 9, 381-399.
16.
Farnworth, M., Teske, R., & Thurman, G. (1991). Ethnic, racial, and minority disparity in felony court processing. In M. Lynch & E. B. Patterson (Eds.), Race and criminal justice(pp. 54-70). Albany, NY: Harrow and Keston.
17.
Feeley, M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in lower criminal court.New York: Russell Sage.
18.
Feeney, F., Dill, F.,& Weir, A. (1983). Arrests without conviction: How often they occur and why. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
19.
Gottfredson, M.,& Gottfredson, D. (1988). Decisionmaking in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20.
Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law & Society Review, 8, 357-383.
21.
Jamieson, K.,& Blowers, A. (1993). A structural examination of misdemeanor court disposition patterns. Criminology, 31(2), 243-262.
22.
Justice Policy Institute. (2002). Reducing disproportionate minority confinement: TheMultnomah County, Oregon success story and its implications. Washington, DC: The Justice Policy Institute.
23.
Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
24.
Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 783-805.
25.
Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. SociologicalQuarterly, 34, 357-376.
26.
LaFree, G. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape.American Sociological Review, 45, 842-854.
27.
Leiber, M. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native North American Indians relative to African Americans and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11(2), 257-279.
28.
Leiber, M. (2003). The contexts of juvenile justice decision making: When race matters.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
Leiber, M.,& Jamieson, K. (1995). Race, decision making and the implications of context in juvenile justice proceedings. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11(4), 363-388.
30.
Leiber, M., & Mack, K. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime& Delinquency, 40(1), 34-70.
31.
Leiber, M., & Stairs, J. (1999). Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal ofResearch in Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 56-86.
32.
Lizotte, A. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago’s criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice. Social Problems, 25, 564-580.
33.
Mears, D. (1998). The sociology of sentencing: Reconceptualizing decision-making processes and outcomes. Law & Society Review, 32, 667-724.
34.
Miller, J. (1996). Search and destroy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Myers, M. (1989). Symbolicpolic y and the sentencing of drug offenders. Law & SocietyReview, 23, 295295.
36.
Myers, M., & Talarico, S. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37.
Neubauer, D. (1992). America’s criminal courts and the criminal justice system. PacificGrove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
38.
Petersen, T. (1985). A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models.American Sociological Review, 50, 130-131.
39.
Peterson, R., & Hagan, J. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research. American Sociological Review, 49, 56-70.
40.
Pope, C. E. (1995). Equity within the juvenile justice system: Directions for the future. In K.Kempf-Leonard, C. E. Pope, & W. H. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice(pp. 201-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Ragona, A., & Ryan, J. P. (1983). Misdemeanor courts and the choice of sanctions: A comparative view. Justice System Journal, 8, 199199.
42.
Ragona, A., & Ryan, J. P. (1984). Beyond the courtroom: A comparative analysis of misdemeanor sentencing: Executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
43.
Rainville, G. (2001). An analysis of factors related to prosecutor sentencing preferences.Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(4), 295-310.
44.
Reskin, B., & Visher, C. (1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors’ decisions. Law & Society Review, 20, 423-438.
45.
Ryan, J. P. (1980). Adjudication and sentencing in a misdemeanor court: The outcome is the punishment. Law & Society Review, 15, 79-108.
46.
Sampson, R.,& Lauritsen, J. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Ethnicity, crime and immigration: Comparative and cross-national perspectives(pp. 311-374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Sanborn, J., Jr. (1996). Factor perceived to affect delinquent dispositions in juvenile court:Putting the sentencing decision into context. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 99-113.
48.
Smith, B., & Damphousse, K. (1998). Terrorism, politics, and punishment: A test of structural-contextual theory and the “liberation hypothesis.” Criminology, 36, 67-92.
49.
Spears, J., & Spohn, C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501-524.
50.
Spohn, C.,& Biechner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149-184.
51.
Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8(3), 305-327.
52.
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J.,& Welch, S. (1981-82). The effect of race on sentencing: Are-examination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review, 16, 72-88.
53.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
54.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649-679.
55.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly—White, Black, White-Hispanic, or Black-Hispanic defendants? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
56.
Steffensmeier, D.,& Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-Black-White comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
57.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J.,& Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
58.
Swigert, V., & Farrell, R. (1976). Murder, inequality, and the law: Differential treatment in the legal process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
59.
Tonry, M. (1995). Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Ulmer, J.,& Kramer, J. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentence disparity. Criminology, 34(3), 383-408.
61.
Welch, S., Spohn, C., & Gruhl, J. (1984). Convicting and sentencing differences among Black, Hispanic, and White males in six localities. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 257-264.
62.
Wilbanks, W. (1987). The myth of a racist criminal justice system. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
63.
Zatz, M. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal ofResearch in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
