Dramatic increases in the number of women incarcerated in state and federal prisons have led some researchers to conclude that differential sentencing of female offenders is a thing of the past. This study uses data on offenders convicted of felonies in Chicago, Miami, and Kansas City to address this issue. The authors find no evidence to support this “gender neutrality” hypothesis. In all three jurisdictions, women face significantly lower odds of incarceration than do men. The results also reveal that the effect of race is conditioned by gender but the effect of gender, with only one exception, is not conditioned by race; harsher treatment of racial minorities is confined to men but more lenient treatment of women is found for both racial minorities and Whites.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albonetti, C. A. -1997-. Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789-822.
2.
Bernstein, I. N., Kelly, W. R., & Doyle, P. A. -1977-. Societal reaction to deviants: The case of criminal defendants. American Sociological Review, 42, 743-755.
3.
Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. -1991-. The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38, 372-394.
4.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S. E., & Tonry, M. H. -1983-. Research on sentencing: The search for reform -Vol. 1-. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
Bridges, G. S., & Steen, S. -1998-. Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional steretypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. -1998-. Prisoners in 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Chesney-Lind, M. -1997-. The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Chiricos, T. G., & Bales, W. D. -1991-. Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29, 701-724.
9.
Crew, K. B. -1991-. Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8, 59-84.
10.
Curran, D. -1983-. Judicial discretion and defendant's sex. Criminology, 21, 41-58.
11.
Daly, K. -1987-. Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21, 267-290.
12.
Daly, K. -1989-. Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136-168.
13.
Daly, K. -1994-. Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Daly, K., & Bordt, R. -1995-. Sex effects and sentencing: A review of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 143-177.
15.
Daly, K., & Tonry, M. -1997-. Gender, race and sentencing. In M. Tonry -Ed.-, Crime and justice: A review of research -Vol. 22-. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Durham, A. M., III. -1994-. Crisis and reform: Current issues in American punishment. Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
Farnworth, M., & Horan, P. -1980-. Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes. Social Science Research, 9, 381-399.
18.
Frazier, C. E., Bock, W. E., & Henretta, J. C. -1980-. Pretrial release and bail decisions: The effects of legal, community, and personal variables. Criminology, 18, 162-181.
19.
Gruhl, J., Welch, S., & Spohn, C. -1984-. Women as criminal defendants: A test for paternalism. Western Political Quarterly, 37, 456-467.
20.
Hanuschek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. -1977-. Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Irwin, J., & Austin, J. -1997-. It's about time: America's imprisonment binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
Johnston, J. B., Kennedy, T. D., & Shuman, I. G. -1987-. Gender differences in the sentencing of felony offenders. Federal Probation, 51, 49-55.
23.
Kruttschnitt, C. -1980-1981-. Social status and sentences of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 15, 247-265.
24.
Lichter, D. T. -1989-. Race, employment hardship, and inequality in the American nonmetropolitan South. American Sociological Review, 54, 436-446.
Miethe, T. D., & Moore, C. A. -1986-. Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217-237.
27.
Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. -1986-. Urban justice, rural injustice? Urbanization and its effect on sentencing. Criminology, 24, 367-390.
28.
Nagel, I. H., & Hagan, J. -1982-. The sentencing of white-collar criminals in federal courts: A socio-legal exploration of disparity. Michigan Law Review, 80, 427-465.
29.
Nagel, I. H., & Hagan, J. -1983-. Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In M. Tonry -Ed.-, Crime and justice: A review of research -Vol. 4-. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Nobiling, T., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. -1998-. A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459-485.
31.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. -1998-. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
32.
Patterson, E. B., & Lynch, M. J. -1991-. Biases in formalized bail procedures. In M. J. Lynch & E. B. Patterson -Eds.-, Race and criminal justice. New York: Harrow and Heston.
33.
Rasche, C. -1975-. The female offender as an object of criminological research. In A. Brodsky -Ed.-, The female offender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Spohn, C., DeLone, M., & Spears, J. -1998-. Race/ethnicity, gender, and sentence severity in Dade County, Florida: An examination of the decision to withhold adjudication. Journal of Crime & Justice, 21, 111-138.
35.
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. -1987-. The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology, 25, 171-195.
36.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. -2000-. The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
37.
Spohn, C. C., & Spears, J. W. -1997-. Gender and case-processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8, 29-59.
38.
Spohn, C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. -1985-. Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 178-185.
39.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. -1993-. Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
40.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. -1998-. The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
41.
Studenmund, A. H. -1992- Using econometrics: A practical guide. New York: HarperCollins.
42.
Wonders, N. A. -1996-. Determinate sentencing: a feminist and postmodern story. Justice Quarterly, 13, 611-648.
43.
Zatz, M. -1987-. The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
44.
Zingraff, M., & Thomsen, R. -1984-. Differential sentencing of women and men in the U.S.A. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12, 401-413.
