Research Attitude and Productivity Among Faculty at Four-Year U.S. Institutions: A Socialization Perspective

Abstract

This study examines factors that influence attitudes vis-a-vis research and research productivity among apparel and textile faculty at four-year U.S. institutions from a socialization perspective. Survey data (N = 242) collected from International Textile and Apparel Association members of U.S. four-year institutions were analyzed via a path analysis with LISREL structural equation modeling as well as factorial analysis of variance. Results indicated that perceived support from graduate school, colleagues, institutionsladministrators and family, respectively, were important predictors of attitude toward research. Attitude toward research, in turn, directly influenced research productivity. Environmental and professional characteristics also influenced perceived support from various socialization agents, research attitude, and productivity. On the other hand, personal demographic characteristics had no influence on either perceived support from socialization agents or research attitude and productivity.

Keywords

research attitude productivity socialization.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, A.E. , & Gamson, Z.F. (1983). Academic workplace: New demands, heightened tensions . ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education .

Baldwin, R.G. (1990). Faculty vitality beyond the research university: Extending a contextual concept. Journal of Higher Education , 61(2), 160-180.

Bayer, A.E. (1970). College and university faculty: A statistical description. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

Blackburn, R.T. , Behymer, C.E. , & Hall, D. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications . Center for the study of higher education. University of Michigan, (132-141).

Bess, J.L. (1978). Anticipatory socialization of graduate students. Research in Higher Education, 8, 289-317.

Brim, O.G., Jr. (1968). Adult socialization. In J. A. Clausen (Ed.), Socialization and society (pp. 182-226). Boston: Little Brown.

Broschart, K.R. (1978). Family status and professional achievement: A study of women doctorates. Journal of Marriage and The Family . (February), 71-76.

Creager, J.A. (1971). The American graduate student: A normative description . Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

DeVries, D. (1975). The relationship of role expectations to faculty behavior. Research in Higher Education, 3, 111-129.

10.

Engel, J.F. , Blackwell, R.D. , & Miniard, P.W. (1995). Consumer behavior, 8th ed., Chicago, IL: The Dryden .

11.

Fox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-303.

12.

Hair, J.F. , Anderson, R.E. , Tatham, R.L. , & Black, W.C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis, 3rd ed., NY: McMillan.

13.

Jörgstrom, K.G. , & Sörbom, D. (1988) LISREL 7, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

14.

Johnstrud, L.K. (1991). Administrative promotion: The power of gender . The Journal of Higher Education. 62(2), 119-149.

15.

Kanter, R.M. (1979). Changing the shape of work: Reform in academe . Current Issues in Higher Education, I, 3-9.

16.

Kyvik, S. , & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, technology, and human values, 21(1), 54-72.

17.

Lawrence, J.H. , & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 22-38.

18.

McElrath, K. (1992). Gender, career disruption, and academic rewards , The Journal of Higher-Education, 63(3), 269-281.

19.

Merton, R.K. , & Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1972). A professional school for training in social research. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Qualitative analysis. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

20.

Mortimer, J.T. , & Simmons, R.G. (1978). Adult socialization. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 421-454.

21.

Moschis, G.P. (1987). Consumer socialization: A life-cycle perspective , 2nd ed., Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

22.

Moschis, G.P. , & Churchill, G.A. (1978). Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. The Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 599-609.

23.

Newmann, Y. , & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The support-stress paradigm and faculty research publication. Journal of Higher Education , 61(5), 555-580.

24.

Reynolds, A. (1992). Charting the changes in junior faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 63(6),637-652.

25.

Rudd, E. (1988). The evaluation of the quality of research. Studies in Higher Education, 13(1), 45-57.

26.

Yoakum, J.C. (1993). Research productivity of Home Economic Education faculty in public doctorate-granting university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The Ohio State University, Columbus .