The means-end chain model provided the framework to assess how consumers evaluate clothing quality by examining the cognitive structure that exists between the evaluative criteria used to judge quality and personal values. The in-depth probing technique of laddering was used to elicit responses from 25 women. Analysis of the resulting protocols indicates that for this group of consumers, the concept of perceived clothing quality includes a number of associated concepts at various levels of abstraction. While a number of attributes were identified by the subjects, only "fabric" was consistently chosen by the women to denote quality. The underlying reasons for their choice become evident at higher levels of abstraction where other concepts of perceptions of quality emerged. In this study, consumers evaluated quality using attributes that they associated with social, psychological, economic, physiological, and aesthetic consequences. Research to assess how consumers evaluate quality should be designed to include factors other than physical attributes.
Alba, J.H., & Hutchinson, J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454.
2.
Baugh, D.F., & Davis, L. (1989). The effect of store image on consumers' perception of designer and private label clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7, 15-21.
3.
Behling, D.U., & Wilch, J. (1988). Perceptions of branded clothing by male consumers . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(2), 43-47.
4.
Cassill, N.L., & Drake, M.F. (1987). Apparel selection criteria related to female consumers' lifestyle. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 20-28.
5.
Davis, B., Kem, S.A., & Stemquist, B. (1986). Consumers' perception of quality and price given the information cues of country of origin, store image and the buy American campaign [Summary]. Proceeding of the Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing, 88.
6.
Davis, L.L. (1985). Effects of physical quality and brand labeling on perceptions of clothing quality. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 61, 671-677.
7.
Davis, L.L. (1987). Consumer use of label information in ratings of clothing quality and clothing fashionability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 8-14.
8.
Dickerson, K. (1982). Imported versus U.S.-produced apparel : Consumer views and buying patterns. Home Economics Research Journal , 10(3), 241-252.
9.
Ditcher, E. (1960). The strategy of desire. New York: Doubleday.
10.
Fiore, A.M. & Damhorst, M.L. (1992). Intrinsic cues as predictors of perceived quality of apparel. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 5, 168-178.
11.
Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization process. Journal of Marketing, 1, 23-43.
12.
Gutman, J. & Alden, S. (1985). Adolescents cognitive structure of retail stores and fashion consumption: A means-end chain analysis of quality. In J. Jacoby & J. Olson (Ed.), Perceived quality: How consumers view stores and merchandise (pp. 99-114), Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
13.
Gutman, J. & Reynolds, T.J. (1979). An investigation of the levels of cognitive abstraction utilized by consumers in product differentiation . In J. Eighmey (Ed.), Attitude Research Under the Sun (pp. 128-150), Chicago : American Marketing Association.
14.
Heisey, F.L. (1990). Perceived quality and predicted price: Use of the minimum information environment in evaluating apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(4), 22-28.
15.
Hemmerick, B.T. & Sproles, G.B. (1988). How well do 'off-price' retailers satisfy consumers ? Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 12, 173-182.
16.
Howard, J.A. (1977). Consumer behavior: Application of theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Jenkins, M.C. & Dickey, L.E. (1976). Consumer types based on evaluation criteria underlying clothing decisions. Home Economics Research Journal, 4(3), 150-162.
18.
Norum, P.S. & Clark, L.A. (1989). A comparison of quality and retail price of domestically produced and imported blazers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 1-9.
19.
Olson, J.C. & Reynolds, T.C. (1983). Understanding consumers' cognitive structures: Implications for advertising strategy. In L. Percy & A.B. Woodside (Eds.) Advertising and consumer psychology (pp.77-90), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
20.
Reynolds, T. (1985). Implications for value research: A macro vs. micro perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 2, 297-305.
21.
Reynolds, T.C., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation . Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 11-31.
22.
Reynolds, T., & Gutman, J. (1984a). Advertising is image management. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(1), 27-37.
23.
Reynolds, T., & Gutman, J. (1984b). Laddering: Extending the Repertory Grid Methodology to construct attribute-consequence-value hierarchies. In R. Pitts & A. Woodside (Eds.), Personal values and consumer psychology (pp. 155-167), Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
24.
Reynolds, T., & Jamieson, L. (1985). Image representations: An analytical framework . In J. Jacoby & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality: How consumers view stores and merchandise (pp. 115-138), Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
25.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
26.
Ryan, M.W. (1966). Clothing: A study in human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27.
Scott, W.A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
Stemquist, B., & Davis, B. (1986). Store status and country of origin as information cues: Consumer's perception of sweater price and quality. Home Economics Research Journal, 15(2), 124-131.
30.
Vinson, D.E., Scott, J.E., & Lamont, L.M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 41, 44-50.
31.
Wall, M. & Heslop, L.A. (1986). Canadian consumer attitudes toward the quality of Canadian, U.S. and foreign made apparel [Summary]. Proceeding of the Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing , 87.
32.
Zeithmal, V.A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing , 1-19.
