The outcome of exchange relationships between retailers and manufacturers may depend upon the amount of power held by each channel member. In this study, the power held by apparel retailers and manufacturers was examined, based on Emerson's power-dependence theory which states that one channel member's power resides in the dependency of another. Results indicate that the power of retailers and manufacturers was related to their dependence on each other. An imbalance of power was found, with retailers perceived as having greater power than manufacturers in key decision-making areas.
Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
2.
Alderson, W., & Martin, M.W. (1965). Toward a formal theory of transactions and transvections . Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 117-127.
3.
American Textile Manufacturers Institute. ( 1987). Statements of the American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc., Before the United States International Trade Commission in re Origin Rules for Proposed U.S.-Canada Free Trade Area (Commission Investigation #332-243) . Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Anthony, C.A.E., & Jolly, L.D. (1991). The influence of uncertainty on ratings of information importance by retail apparel buyers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,10, 1-7.
5.
Bagozzi, R.P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39, 32-39.
6.
Bagozzi, R.P. (1978). Marketing as exchange: A theory of transactions in the marketplace. American Behavioral Scientist, 21, 535-556.
7.
Bagozzi, R.P. (1979). Toward a formal theory of marketing exchange. In O. C. Ferrell, S. W. Brown, & C. W. Lamb, Jr. (Eds.), Conceptual and theoretical development in marketing (pp. 431-437). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
8.
Brown, J., & Day, R. (1981). Measures of manifest conflict in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 263-274.
9.
Buchanan, L., & Su, W. (1988). Coping with the uncertainty of consumer markets . In M. J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 396-402). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
10.
Burgess, R.L., & Nielson, J.M. (1974). An experimental analysis of some structural determinants of equitable and inequitable exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 39, 427-443.
11.
Chanil, D. (1990, July). Buyers and vendors breaking barriers. Direct Marketing, 28-40.
12.
Dickerson, K.G. (1991). Textiles and apparel in the international economy . New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
13.
Dickerson, K.G., & Dalecki, M. (1991). Apparel manufacturers' perceptions of supplier-retailer relationships. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9 (3), 7-14.
14.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley.
15.
Dyer, F.R., & Oh, S. (1987). Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 347-358.
16.
El-Ansary, A.L., & Stern, L.W. (1972). Power measurement in the distribution channel . Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 47-52.
17.
Emerson, R.M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
18.
Emerson, R.M. (1972). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress 2 (pp. 58-87). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
19.
Etgar, M. (1976). Channel domination and contervailing power in distributive channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 254-262.
20.
Etgar, M. (1977). Channel environment and channel leadership. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 69-76.
21.
Etgar, M. (1978). Selection of an effective channel control mix . Journal of Marketing, 42, 53-58.
22.
Frazier, G.L. (1983). On the measurement of interfirm power in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 158-166.
23.
Frazier, G.L., & Summers, J.O. (1984). Interfirm influence strategies and their application within distribution channels. Journal of Marketing,48, 43-55.
24.
Frazier, G.L., & Summers, J.O. (1986). Perceptions of interfirm power and its use within a franchise channel of distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 169-176.
25.
Fridson, M.S., & Heaney, M.C. (1987, November 1). Divisional buyouts: Why purchasers and sellers can both win. High Performance, pp. 5-12.
26.
Gaski, J.F. (1986). Interrelations among a channel entity's power sources: Impact of the exercise of reward and coercion on expert, referent, and legitimate sources. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 62-77.
27.
Gaski, J.F., & Nevin, J.R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 130-142.
28.
Ghadar, F., Davidson, W., & Feigenoff, C. (1987). U.S. industrial competitiveness: The case of the textile and apparel industries. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
29.
Houston, F.S., & Gassenheimer, J.B. (1987). Marketing and exchange . Journal of Marketing, 51, 3-18.
30.
Hunt, S.D. (1976). The nature and scope of marketing. Journal of Marketing,40, 17-28.
31.
Hunt, S.D. (1983). General theories and the fundamental explananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing,47 (Fall), 9-17.
32.
Hunt, S.D., & Nevin, J.R. (1974). Power in a channel of distribution: Sources and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 186-193.
33.
Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36, 46-54.
34.
Lusch, R. (1976). Sources of power: Their impact on interchannel conflict. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 382-390.
35.
Lusch, R. (1977). Franchise satisfaction: Causes and consequences . International Journal of Physical Distribution, 7, 7-10.
36.
Lusch, R., & Brown, J.R. (1982). A modified model of power in the marketing channel . Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 312-323.
37.
McInnes, W. (1964). A conceptual approach to marketing. In R. Cox, W. Alderson, & S. J. Shapiro (Eds.), Theory in marketing (pp. 51-67). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
38.
Michaels, J.W., & Wiggins, J.A. (1976). Effects of mutual dependency and dependency asymmetry on social exchange. Sociometry, 39, 368-376.
39.
Michie, D. (1978). Managerial tactics: An alternative explanation of warranty satisfaction in a channel of distribution. In S. Jain (Ed.), Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogue and directions (pp. 260-265). Chicago: American Marketing.
40.
Molm, L.D. (1987). Linking power structure and power use. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 103-129). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
Park, C.W., & Zaltman, G. (1987). Marketing management. Chicago : The Dryden Press.
42.
Rosenberg, L., & Stern, L. (1971). Conflict measurement in the distri- bution channel . Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 437-442.
43.
Rudolph, B. (1988, November 21). Invasion of the cachet snatchers . Time, p. 114.
44.
Sheldon's retail directory. (1990). Fairview, NJ: Phelon, Sheldon and Marsar.
45.
Shim, S., & Drake, M.F. (1991). Profitability of women's apparel shops: Business practices, promotions and store-owner characteristics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 68-75.
46.
United States Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census and International Trade Administration (ITA). (1990). U.S. Industrial Outlook 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
Wilkinson, I.F. (1974). Researching the distribution channels for consumer and industrial goods: The power dimension. Journal of Market Research Society, 16, 12-32.
48.
Wilkinson, I.F. (1981). Power, conflict, and satisfaction in distribution channels—An empirical study. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 11, 20-30.
