With increased competition and a changing market place, apparel manufacturers are searching for efficient and responsive production facilities. Selection of appropriate sewing systems is a fundamental part of manufacturing plans. This exploratory study presents a conceptual framework for the study of sewing systems. The framework is applied and tested in an empirical study of the sewing systems used by 96 apparel producers. The product line characteristics of volume and style change frequency directly relate to the type of sewing system used. The conceptual framework has implications for academicians and practitioners studying sewing systems.
Arpan, J., de la Torre, J., Toyne, B., Bacchetta, M., Jedel, M., Stephan, P., & Halliburton, J. (1982). The U.S. apparel industry: International challenge, domestic response. Atlanta, GA : Georgia State University.
7.
Belleau, B.D., & Didier, J.T. (1989). Computer technology use by Louisiana apparel manufacturers . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 47-50.
8.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Carr, H.C. (1972). The clothingfactory. London : The Clothing Institute.
11.
Caves, R.E., & Rosen, J.B. (1982). Uncertainty, transaction costs, and the size of distribution of rival firms: Theory and evidence from the women's outerwear industry. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 22(3), 6-22.
12.
Cline, W. (1987). The future of world trade in textiles and apparel . Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
13.
Cooklin, G. (1991). Introduction to clothing manufacture. London: BSP Professional Books.
14.
de la Torre, J., Jedel, M., Arpan, J., Ogram, E., & Toyne, B. (1978). Corporate response to import competition in the U.S. apparel industry. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
15.
Dickerson, K.G., Dalecki, M., & Meyer, M. (1991). A state apparel industry needs assessment: Special concerns for rural economies. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9(2), 37-44.
16.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method . New York: Wiley.
17.
Forney, J.C., Rosen, D.C., & Orzechowski, J.M. (1990). Domestic versus overseas apparel production: Dialogue with San Francisco-based manufacturers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(3), 39-44.
18.
Frank, B. (1953). Progressive apparel production with case problems . New York: Fairchild Publications .
19.
Frank, B. (1948). The progressive sewing room. New York: Fairchild Publications.
20.
Georgia Institute of Technology. (1980). Marketing strategies for U.S. apparel producers to compete more effectively with imports (PB81-105256). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
21.
Hannan, W.M. (1963). The methods of sewing. New York: Kogos Publication.
Toyne, B., Arpan, J.S., Ricks, D.A., Shimp, T.A., & Barnett, A. (1984). The global textile industry. London: George Allen & Unwin.
37.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. (1987 , April). The U.S. textile and apparel industry: A revolution in progress - A special report (OTA-TET-332). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1985, December). 1982 Census of manufacturers. General summary, Part 2. Industry Statistics by Em
39.
ployment Size of Establishment, Subject Series (MC82-S-1 part 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government-Printing Office.
40.
Wise, W. (1990). Flexibility: The key to competitiveness for United States swimwear and intimate apparel producers. Apparel Manufacturer , 2(2), 46-52.
41.
Zenov, E. (1977). How to design your factory layout. Best of Bobbin, 3, 158-165.
