The Fabric's the Thing: Literal and Figurative References to Textiles in Selected Plays of William Shakespeare

Abstract

Shakespeare revealed his notion of the nature of his times and culture in his plays. In this study the authors concentrate on terms and references identified with textiles used in dress in the plays of William Shakespeare. They categorize those terms which are literal and those which are figurative. The analysis demonstrates that Shakespeare, a product of and interactive with his times, ultimately stated important generalizations regarding social, economic, and political conditions in Elizabethan society by means of those terms and references.

Class consciousness, for example, permeated every aspect of Elizabethan society, and this comes through clearly in the distinctions made between three-ply velvet and hempen homespun, between silk and Welsh, flannel. By understanding the historical and social contexts of the terms used in the plays, the reader has a clearer understanding of the meaning of the plays as well as a deeper appreciation of the importance of textiles as used in dress throughout history. In addition, the analysis has validity for our own age as we use material in apparel to state aspects of, conditions of, issues in, or beliefs about our culture. The study, moreover, results in an applied, interpretive strategy for symbolically analyzing language phenomena in a literary creation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barthes, R. (1983). The fashion system (M. Ward & R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1967)

Beck, S.W. (1969). Gloves, their annals and associations: A chapter of trade and social history. Detroit: Singing Tree Press. (Original work published 1883)

Bigelow, M.S. (1970). Fashion in history: Apparel in the western world . Minneapolis: Burgess.

Carroll, W.C. (1976). The great feast of language in Love's Labour's Lost. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 245-269). New York: Academic Press.

Clark, C. (1937). Shakespeare and costume. London : The Mitre Press.

Cunnington, C.W. , & Cunnington, P. (1954). English costume in the sixteenth century. London: Faber and Faber.

Evans, G. , & Evans, B.L. (1978). The Shakespeare companion. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Evans, G. B. (Ed.). (1974). The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Fairholt, F.W. (1968). Costume in England, Vol. II. Glossary. Detroit: Singing Tree Press. (Original work published 1885)

11.

Harris, A.C. (1981). From linguistic theory to meaning in educational practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

12.

Harris, A.C. , & Owens, N.J. (1990). Doth apparel the symbol make? A semiotic investigation of symbolic references to dress in selected plays of William Shakespeare. The American Journal of Semiotics, 7(4), 109-130.

13.

Laver, J. (1969). The concise history of costume and fashion. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

14.

Linthicum, M.C. (1936). Costume in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries . Oxford: Clarendon Press.

15.

Macquoid, P. (1917). Costume. In Shakespeare's England: An account of the life & manners of his age, Vol. II (pp. 91-117). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

16.

Montgomery, F.M. (1984). Textiles in America, 1650-1870. New York: W. W. Norton.

17.

Murray, J. A. H. (Ed.). (1971). The compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.

18.

Oakes, A. , & Hill, M.H. (1970). Rural costume: Its origin and development in western Europe and the British Isles. London: Batsford.

19.

Pike, K. (1975). On describing languages. In R. Austerlitz (Ed.), The scope of American linguistics: Papers of the First Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America (pp. 26-27). Lisse: the Peter de Ridder Press.

20.

Roach-Higgins, M.E. , & Eicher, J.B. (1992). Dress and identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(4), 1-8.

21.

Strutt, J. (1796-99). A complete view of the dress and habits of the people of England, Vol. II. London: n.p.

22.

Walkup, F.P. (1950). Dressing the part: A history of costume for the theatre (rev. ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .

23.

Wescher, H. (1950). Dress and fashion in the court of Queen Elizabeth . Ciba Review, 4, 2843-2849.

24.

Wilson, K. (1979). A history of textiles. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.