Research has suggested that (a) victims of sexual assault evidence significant passive and submissive personality structures, (b) such submissive affective traits are characteristic of victims prior to their assaults, (c) sexual assault offenders look for visual cues of vulnerability when selecting a victim, (d) females high and low in submissiveness exhibit different clothing and body language behaviors, and (e) males form differing perceptions of females who are high versus low in submissive personality traits. Propositions associated with theories of self enhancement, communication, perception, and impression formation were united to form a more comprehensive theoretical perspective upon nonverbal communication. This perspective, when analyzed against the results of the abovementioned sexual assault research, provided a logical explanation of the victim selection process wherein nonverbal appearance cues (both body adornment and body language) play a paramount role.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
2.
Abel, G., Barlow, D., Blanchard, E., & Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapists' sexual arousal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 895-903.
3.
Abel, G., Becker, J., Blanchard, E., & Djenderadjian, A. (1978). Differentiating sexual aggressives with penile measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 5, 315-322.
4.
Adler, R., & Towne, N. (1981). Looking out, looking in (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5.
Alexander, C. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses'perceptions of victims of rape. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 22-33.
6.
Amir, M. (1971). Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Amir, M. (1975). Forcible rape. In L. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 43-58). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
8.
Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. London : Methuen.
9.
Barbaree, H., Marshall, W., & Lanthier, R. (1979). Deviant sexual arousal in rapists. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 17, 215-222.
10.
Bromberg, W. (1965). Crime and the mind. New York : Macmillan.
11.
Bruner, J., Shapiro, D., & Tagiuri, R. (1958). The meaning of traits in isolation and in combination . In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 277-288). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Buck, R., Miller, R., & Caul, W. (1974). Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 587-596.
13.
Buck, R., Savin, V., Miller, R., & Caul, W. (1972).Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 362-371.
14.
Burt, M. (1978). Attitudes supportive of rape in American culture. House Committee on Science and Technology, Research into violent behavior: Sexual assaults. (Hearing, 95th Congress, Second Session, 1978). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
16.
Byrne, D., London, D., & Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259-271.
17.
Check, J., & Malamuth, N. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquain tance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.
18.
Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Women's Press.
19.
Cohn, B. (1975). Succumbing to rape. In L. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 10-11). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
20.
Fisher, A. (1978). Perspective on human communication. New York: Macmillan.
21.
Gager, N., & Schurr, C. (1976). Sexual assault: Confronting rape in America. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
22.
Gallois, C., & Callan, V. (1986). Decoding emotional messages: Influence of ethnicity, sex, message type and channel. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 755-762.
23.
Goffman, E. (1973). The presentation of self in everyday life. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press.
24.
Greer, G. (1975). Seduction is a four-letter word. In L. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 374-395). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
25.
Hamid, P. (1968). Style of dress as a perceptual cue in impression formation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 904-906.
26.
Hays, W. (1958). An approach to the study of trait implication and trait similarity. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 289-299). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
27.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Hinton, J., O'Neill, M., & Webster, S. (1980). Psychophysiological assessment of sex offenders in a security hospital. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 205-216.
29.
Horos, C. (1974). Rape, the private crime, the social horror. New Canaan, CT: Tobey.
30.
Jones, E., & Thibaut, J. (1958). Interaction goals as bases of inference in interpersonal perception. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 151-178). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
Kaigler-Evans, K. & Damhorst, M. (1978). Impression formation: Use of descriptors of personal traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 903-906.
32.
Kaiser, S. (1985). The social psychology of clothing and personal adornment. New York: Macmillan.
33.
Kaiser, S. (1990). The social psychology of clothing: Symbolic appearance in context. (2nd ed.). New York : Macmillan.
34.
Kanekar, S., & Kolsawalla, M. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness and provocativeness . Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 153-154.
35.
Katz, S., & Mazur, M. (1979). Understanding the rape victim: A synthesis of research findings. New York: John Wiley.
36.
Lanzetta, J., & Kleck, R. (1970). Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 12-19.
37.
Lipton, D. (1987). Heterosocial perception in rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 17-21.
38.
Livesley, W., & Bromley, D. (1973). Person perception in childhood and adolescence . New York: John Wiley.
39.
MacDonald, J. (1975). Rape: Offenders and their victims. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
40.
McCauldron, R. (1967). Rape. Canadian Journal of Corrections , 9, 37-57.
41.
Mehrabian, A., & Reed, H. (1973). Some determinants of communication accuracy. In C. Mortensen & K. Soreno (Eds.), Advances in communication research (pp. 331-349). New York: Harper & Row.
42.
Miller, A. (1970). Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 19, 241-243.
43.
Miller, J., Moeller, D., Kaufman, A., Divasto, P., Pathak, D., & Christy, J. (1978). Recidivism among sex assault victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 1103-1104.
44.
Myers, M., Templer, D., & Brown, R. (1984). Coping ability of women who become victims of rape. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 73-78.
45.
Norman, W., & Goldberg, L. (1966). Raters, ratees and randomness in personality structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
46.
Quinsey, V., Chaplin, T., & Varney, G. (1981). A comparison of rapists and non-sex offenders' sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape and physical abuse of women. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 127-135.
47.
Richards, L., Rollerson, B., & Phillips, J. (in press). Perceptions of submissiveness: Implications for victimization . Journal of Psychology.
48.
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J., DiMatteo, M., Rogers, P., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
49.
Schneider, J., & Schneider-Duker, M. (1984). Sex roles and nonverbal sensitivity. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 281-282.
50.
Seligman, C., Brickman, J., & Koulack, D. (1977). Rape and physical attractiveness: Assigning responsibility to victims. Journal of Personality, 45, 554-563.
51.
Selkin, J. (1975). Rape: When to fight back. Psychology Today, 8, 71-76.
52.
Shaver, K. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
53.
Sirgy, M. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300.
54.
Snyder, M., Stephen, W., & Rosenfield, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 435-441.
55.
Terry, R. (1981). Contextual similarities in subjective probabilities of rape and other events. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 293-294.
56.
Terry, R., & Doerge, S. (1979). Dress, posture and setting as additive factors in subjective probabilities of rape. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 903-906.
57.
Thornton, B., & Ryckman, R. (1983). The influence of a rape victim's physical attractiveness and observers' attributions of responsibility. Human Relations , 36, 549-561.
58.
Tubbs, S., & Moss, S. (1974). Human communication: An interpersonal perspective . New York: Random House.
59.
United States Department of Justice. (1988 ). Uniform crime reports for the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60.
Weiss, K., & Borges, S. (1975). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. In L. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp.91-141). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
61.
West, C. (1981). The social and psychological distortion of information . Chicago: Nelson Hall.
62.
Wiggins, N., & Wiggins, J. (1969). A typological analysis of male preferences for female body type. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4, 89-102.
