Body Cathexis,Clothing Attitude,and Their Relations to Clothing and Shopping Behavior Among Male Consumers

Abstract

This study was designed to segment male apparel consumers based on the interaction between body cathexis and clothing attitude and to investigate differences in clothing behavior, shopping behavior, and individual characteristics among the four groups identified by adapting Sirgy's self image/product-image congruity theory: (a) positive congruity, (b) positive incongruity, (c) negative congruity, and (d) negative incongruity. Data (n = 269) from a national random sample were analyzed. A series of one-wayANOVA analyses revealed that these fourgroups differed in clothing behavior (fashion innovativeness, fashion opinion leadership, sel, f confidence in clothing), shopping behavior (store patronage, shopping interest, attitude toward catalog shopping, satisfactions with ready-to-wear and product variety/stote quality), and individual characteristics (sports lifestyle activity, annual wardrobe expenditure). Based on the findings, the authors discuss theoretical as well as managerial implications.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-884). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Cassill, N.L. , & Drake, M.F. (1987). Apparel selection criteria related to female consumers' lifestyle. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 20-28.

Churchill, G.A. , & Suprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 491-504.

Damhorst, M.L. , & Littrell, M.A. (1984). Clothing interests and body-cathexis of high school cheerleaders. ACPTC proceedings: Combined Central, Eastern and Western Regional Meetings, pp. 38-39.

Davis, L.L. (1985). Self-perceived somatotype, body-cathexis, and attitudes toward clothing among college females. ACPTC proceedings: Combined Central, Eastern and Western Regional Meetings , p. 250.

Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The Total Design Method . New York: McGraw-Hill.

Engel, J.F. , Blackwell, R.D. , & Miniard, P.W. (1990). Consumer behavior (6th ed.). New York: The Dryden Press .

Grubb, E.L. , & Grathwhohl, H.L. (1967). Consumer self concept, symbolism, and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31 (4), 22-27.

Gurel, L.M. , & Gurel, L. (1979). Clothing interest: Conceptualization and measurement . Home Economics Research Journal, 7(5), 274-282.

10.

Hirschman, E.C. , & Adcock, W.O. ( 1979). An examination of innovative communicators, opinion leaders and innovators for men's fashion apparel. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 308-314.

11.

Horn, M.J. , & Gurel, L.M. ( 1981). The second skin (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin .

12.

Kaiser, S.B. (1990). The social psychology ofclothing (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

13.

Labat, K.L.L. (1988). Consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the fit of ready-to-wear clothing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

14.

Mahoney, E.R. , & Finch, M.D. (1976). The dimensionality of body-cathexis. Journal of Psychology, 92(2), 277-279.

15.

Onkvisit, S. , & Shaw, J.J. (1987). Self-concept and image congruence: Some research and managerial implications. Journal of Consumer Marketing , 4(1), 13-23.

16.

Reynolds, F.D. , Crask, M.R. , & Wells, W.D. (1977). The modem feminine lifestyle. Journal of Marketing, 41 (3), 38-45.

17.

Roger, D.B. (1977). The body cathexis scale: Parallel forms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 258.

18.

Rook, D.W. (1985). Body cathexis and market segmentation. In M. R. Solomon (Ed.), The psychology offashion (pp. 233-241). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

19.

Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York : Basic Books.

20.

Rosenberg, M. , & Hovland, C.I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg & C. I. Hovland (Eds.), Attitude organization and change (pp. 1-14). New Haven: Yale University Press.

21.

Ryan, M.S. ( 1965). Perception of self in relation to clothing. In M. E. Roach & J. B. Eicher (Eds.), Dress, adornment, and the social order (pp. 247-249). New York: John Wiley.

22.

Secord, P.F. , & Jourard, S.M. (1953). The appraisal of body-cathexis: Body-cathexis and the self. Journal of Consulting Psychology,17, 343-347.

23.

Shim, S. , & Drake, M.F. (1988). Apparel selection by employed women: A typology of information search patterns. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(2), 1-9.

24.

Sirgy, M.J. (1982a). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9,287-300.

25.

Sirgy, M.J. (1982b). Self-image/product-image congruity and product liking versus purchase intention: A role playing experiment. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association: Consumer Psychology Division, p. 90.

26.

Sontag, M.S. , & Schlater, J.D. (1982). Proximity of clothing to self: Evolution of a concept. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,1 (2), 1-8.

27.

Tigert, D.J. , Ring, L.J. , & King, C.W. (1975). Fashion involvement and buying behavior: A methodological study. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 46-52.

28.

Tucker, L. (1981). Internal structure, factor satisfaction, and reliability of the body cathexis scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 891-896.

29.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1989). Statistical abstract of the United States (109th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.