The study was designed to investigate the effects on credibility ratings and stated intent to purchase of clothing worn by a message source in an advertising situation. Two levels of dress of the message source and two advertising situations were crossed to constitute a 2 x 2 factorial design. The subjects, 102 Black female consumers, were randomly assigned to the four experimental manipulations. Each subject evaluated one advertisement and rated her impression of the credibility of the person pictured in the advertisement and her intent to purchase the product advertised When the source was appropriately dressed for the task demonstrated in the advertisement and photographed in the appropriate situation, the subjects assigned significantly higher credibility and intent-to-purchase ratings than for any other dress-by-situation manipulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, K. (1961). An experimental study of the interaction of artistic and non-artistic ethos in persuasion (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin).
2.
Bassett, R.E. (1979). Effects of source attire on judgment of credibility . Central States Speech Journal, 30(3), 282-285.
3.
Berlo, D.K., Lemert, J.B., & Mertz, R.J. (1966). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of the message source (Research Monograph). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Communication .
4.
Berlo, D.K., Lemert, J.B., & Mertz, R.J. (1969-1970). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly , 33, 563-576.
5.
Blouin, D., Belleau, B., Kelley, E., Romaine, R., Jungeilges, J., & Thomas, K. (1987). Sex- role differences in appropriate multiple-role attire. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 42-48.
6.
Bryant, N. (1975). Petitioning: Dress congruence versus belief congruence . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 155-159.
7.
Buckley, H.M. (1983). Attraction toward a stranger as a linear function of similarity in dress. Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 25-34.
8.
Buckley, H.M., & Roach, M.E. (1974). Clothing as a nonverbal communicator of social and political attitudes. Home Economics Research Journal, 3, 98-102.
9.
Clancy, K.J., & Garsen, R. ( 1970). Why some scales predict better. Journal of Advertising Research, 10, 33-38.
10.
Cronkhite, G., & Laska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43, 91-107.
11.
Damhorst, M.L. (1984-1985). Meaning of clothing cues in social context. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 39-48.
12.
Douglas, S.P., & Solomon, M.R. (1983). Clothing the female executive: Fashion or fortune? In P. E. Murphy (Ed.), American Marketing Association Educators' Proceedings (pp. 127-132). Chicago: AMA.
13.
Douty, H.I. (1963). Influence of clothing on the perception of persons . Journal of Home Economics, 55, 197-201.
14.
Fiske, S. (1982). Introduction to communication studies. New York: Methven.
15.
Forsythe, S.M. (1988). Effect of clothing masculinity on perceptions of managerial traits: Does gender of the perceiver make a difference?Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(2), 10-16.
16.
Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
17.
Gruber, A. (1971). Purchase intent and purchase probability. Journal of Advertising Research, 10, 23-27.
18.
Hoult, T.E. (1954). Experimental measurement of clothing as factor in some social ratings of selected American men. American Sociological Review, 19, 324-328.
19.
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelly, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
Jones, M.K. (1968). Esteem accorded to clothed figures as related to fashion and perception (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University).
21.
Juster, F.T. (1966). Consumer buying intention and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design (Occasional Paper 99). New York: Columbia University Press, National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
Kaiser, S.B. (1983-1984). Toward a social psychology of clothing: A synthesis of symbolic interactionist and cognitive theoretical perspectives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2, 1-9.
23.
Lapitsky, M., & Smith, C.M. (1981). Impact of clothing on impressions of personal characteristics and writing ability. Home Economics Research Journal, 3, 98-102.
24.
Lefkowitz, M., Blake, R., & Mouton, J.S. (1955). Status factors in pedestrian violation of traffic signals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 704-706..
25.
Lennon, S.S., & Miller, F.G. (1984-1985). Attire, physical appearance, and first impressions: More is less. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(1), 1-8.
26.
McCroskey, J.C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72.
27.
Patzer, G.L. (1979). A comparison of advertisement effects: Sexy female communicator vs non-sexy female communicator. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 359-364.
28.
Powell, J.D. (1975). Nonverbal effects of dress and role upon adviser credibility in a first impression situation. Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
29.
Rosencranz, M.L. (1962). Clothing symbolism. Journal of Home Economics, 54, 18-22.
Sharpe, S.E. (1963). Development of a clothing interest-and-importance scale. Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio State University , Columbus.
32.
Steinhaus, N.H., & Lapitsky, M. (1986). Fashion model's age as an influence on consumers' attitudes and purchase intent. Home Economics Research Journal , 14, 294-305.
33.
Thomas, J.B. (1971). The influence of clothing on the perception of personality in a first impression situation. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
34.
Warr, P.B., & Knapper, C. (1968). The perception ofperson and events. New York. John Wiley.
35.
Workman, J.E. (1987). Fashionable versus out-of-date clothing and interpersonal distance. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 5(3), 31-40.
36.
Workman, J.E. (1984-1985). Effects of appropriate and inappropriate attire on attribution of personal dispositions. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(1), 20-23.
37.
Young, L.P. (1985). Influence of clothing on perception of professional credibility of Utah Extension home economists [Abstract]. ACPTC Proceedings: Combined Central, Eastern, and Western Regional Meetings , p. 252.
