Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The U.S. textile and apparel industries have until quite recently displayed a limited capacity to change in spite of continued challenges presented by foreign competition and other environmental factors. The apparent improvement in industry economic indicators since 1986 suggests that these industries may be demonstrating a new and positive adaptability. To some extent this turnaround coincides with the creation and execution of the Crafted With Pride (CWP) campaign. A national survey of presidents in both industries shows that support of CWP is correlated with innovative business practices. These results are logical from a systems perspective which suggests that structure and management of a system are given energy by inputs from the external environment; inputs are then converted by the system into outputs. In this project, CWP is viewed as a component in the external marketing environment of the textile and apparel industries.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Textile Manufacturers Institute. ( 1987, December). Textile hi-lights. Washington, DC: Author.

Arpan, J.S. , de la Torre, J. , & Toyne, B. (1982). The U.S. apparel industry: International challenge, domestic response. Atlanta: College of Business Administration, Georgia State University.

Busch, P.S. , & Houston, M.J. (1985). Marketing: Strategic foundations. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Cady, J.F. , & Buzzell, R.D. (1986). Strategic marketing. Boston . Little, Brown.

Colt Microfiche Library of State Directories. (1987). Red Bank, NJ: Colt Microfiche.

Crafted With Pride Council, Inc. (1986, March). Literature received.

DeGreene, K.B. (1973). Sociotechnical systems: Factors in analysis, design, and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Dickerson, K.G. (1988). The textile sector as a special GATT case. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(3), 17-25.

Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

10.

Easton, D. (1988). An approach to the analysis of political systems . In L. J. Cantori & A. H. Ziegler, Jr. (Eds.), Comparative politics in the post-behavioral era (pp. 97-112). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

11.

Eckstein, O. , Caton, C. , Brinner, R. , & Duprey, P. (1984). The DRI report on U.S. manufacturing industries . New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Honigsbaum, M. (1988, April 18). AAMA lashes out at U.S.mills. Women's Wear Daily, p. 10.

13.

Lawrence, P.R. , & Dyer, D. (1983). Renewing American industry. New York: The Free Press.

14.

Knight, K.E. , & McDaniel, R.R. , Jr. (1979). Organizations: An information systems perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

15.

Mason, J.B. , & Mayer, M.L. (1984,1987). Modern retailing: Theory and practice (3rd & 4th eds.). Plano, TX: Business.

16.

Segal, R. (1988, February). Surface: Viewpoints and opinions. Bobbin, pp. 2, 4.

17.

Toyne, B. , Arpan, J.S. , Ricks, D.A. , Shimp, T.A. , & Barnett, A. (1984). The global textile industry. London: George Allen & Unwin.

18.

U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1983). Statistical abstracts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

19.

U. S. Department of Labor. (1987, February). Monthly labor review. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

20.

Why manufacturing will revive. (1987, January 12). Business Week, pp. 66-68.

21.

Wightman, R. (1984, May 18). AAMA's import stand may shake unity of coalition. Women's Wear Daily, p. 12.

22.

Wightman, R. (1986, May 21). AAMA could change its tune on imports . Women's Wear Daily, p. 8.

Textile and Apparel Industry Support for the Crafted with Pride Campaign: A Systems Perspective

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References