Quality Indicators Used by Retail Buyers in the Purchase of Women's Sportswear

Abstract

This study used a mail questionnaire to investigate the quality indicators used by buyers to purchase women's sportswear. Spearman's Rho and ANOVA were used for analysis. Garment construction and brand name were identified as the best indicators of overall garment quality, but construction, price, and brand name were the most important cues used in purchase decisions. Educational background in basic textiles had little effect on buyers' prioritization of quality cues. Buyers who had more advanced study in textile testing and evaluation ranked fabric characteristics, garment construction, and price as important cues. Use of brand name and place of origin cues were both positively related to buyers' years of experience, while style and wholesaler's information were negatively correlated. Type of store had little effect on buyers' prioritization of quality cues. Style, seconds or irregulars, fabric flaws, dye imperfections, and price negatively affected buyers' purchasing decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews, I.R. , & Valenzi, E.R. (1971). Combining price, brand, and store cues to form an impression of product quality. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 6, 649-650.

Claxton, J.D. , & Ritchie, J.R.B. (1979). Consumer pre-purchase shopping problems: A focus on the retailing component. Journal of Retailing , 55(3), 24-43.

Dardis, R. , Spivak, S. , & Shih, C. (1985). Price and quality differences for imported and domestic men's dress shirts. Home Economics Research Journal , 13, 391-399.

Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The Total Design Method , New York: John Wiley.

Gale, A. , & Dardis, R. (1970). Predicting product performance by price. Textile Chemist and Colorist, 2, 159-163.

Hatch, K.L. , & Roberts, J.A. ( 1985). Use of intrinsic cues to assess textile product quality . Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 9, 341-357.

Judelle, B. (1971). The fashion buyer's job. New York: National Retail Merchants Association.

Knoll, A.L. , & Shiloh, M. (1976). The relative importance of laboratory tested properties of clothing items. Textile Institute and Industry, 14(3), 128-132.

Martin, C.R., Jr. (1971-1972). What consumers of fashion want to know. Journal of Retailing, 47(4), 65-71, 94.

10.

McCullough, J.S. , & Morris, M.A. (1980). Development of a model for quality grading of textile products. Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 116-123.

11.

Olson, J.C. (1977). Price as an information cue: Effects on product evaluations. In A. G. Woodside , J. N. Sheth , & P. D. Bennett (Eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267-286). New York: North Holland.

12.

Olson, J.C. , & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process . Proceedings of the Second Annual Convention of the Association for Consumer Research, 2, 167-179.

13.

Packard, S. , Winters, A.A. , & Axelrod, N. (983). Fashion buying and merchandising (2nd ed.). New York: Fairchild.

14.

Riesz, P. (1978). Price vs. quality in the marketplace 1961-1975 . Journal of Retailing, 54(4), 15-19.

15.

Wheatley, J.J. , & Chui, J.S.Y. (1979). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on product quality evaluations of experts and non-experts. Educator's Conference Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, 44, 205-209.

16.

Wingate, J. , & Friedlander, J. (1978). The management of retail buying (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.