Water Hardness,Detergent Type,and Prewash Product Use as Factors Affecting Methyl Parathion Residue Retained in Protective Apparel Fabrics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of water hardness, detergent type, and prewash product on methyl parathion residue remaining in fabric after laundering. Measured water hardness had not been included as a variable in earlier studies. Its effect is particularly important as water hardness may interfere with the cleaning effectiveness of the detergent, the detersive action of an anionic product being reduced more than that of a nonionic product. The factorial design included (a) two detergents (nonionic and anionic) (b) a prewash product (laundered with or without) (c) fabric finish (unfinished or repellent finished) and (d) five levels of water hardness (0, 300, 600, 900, and 1200ppm). Unlaundered 8 X 8 cm specimens were spiked with 0.2 ml of methyl parathion. Residue was extracted following laundering and quantity remaining was determined by gas chromatography.

The results showed that the repellent finish was effective in limiting methyl parathion absorption. After laundering, residues were greater for a soil-repellent finished fabric than the unfinished fabric even though the initial contamination was lower for the soil-repellent finished fabric. As level of water hardness increased, residue retained increased. The anionic phosphate detergent was less efficient in methyl parathion removal than was heavy duty liquid detergent; however, use of a prewash product before laundering with the anionic detergent resulted in residues on unfinished specimens at levels similar to those for the heavy duty liquid detergent.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. (1988 ). AATCC technical manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Author.

American Society for Testing and Materials. (1988). Annual book of ASTM standards. 07.01 Textiles. Philadelphia, PA: Author.

Das, T.K. , & Kulshreshtha, A.K. (1979). Soil release finishing of textiles: A review. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 38, 611-619.

Easley, C.B. , Laughlin, J.M. , Gold, R.E. , & Hill, R.M. (1982). Laundry factors influencing methyl parathion removal from contaminated denim fabric. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 29, 461-468.

Easley, C.B. , Laughlin, J.M. , Gold, R.E. , & Schmidt, K. (1982) Detergents and water temperature as factors in methyl parathion removal from denim fabrics. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 28, 239-244.

Easley, C.B. , Laughlin, J.M. , Gold, R.E. , & Tupy, D.R. (1983). Laundering procedures for removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid ester and amine from contaminated fabrics. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 12, 71-76.

Easter, E. , & Lietzke, M.H. (1982). The preparation of water samples of known hardness for use in textile testing. Textile Chemist and Colorist, 14, 89-90.

Goodman, C.J. , Laughlin, J.M. , & Gold, RE (1988). Laundering strategies for sequentially (methyl parathion) contaminated protective apparel fabric. In S.Z. Mansdorf & R Sager (Eds.), Performance ofprotective clothing II, ASTM STP 898 (pp. 671-679). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials .

Hild, D.N. , Laughlin, J.M. , & Gold, RE (1989). Laundry parameters as factors in lowering methyl parathion residue in cotton/polyester fabrics. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 18, 910-916.

10.

Keaschall, J.L. , Laughlin, J.M. , & Gold, R.E. (1986). Effect of laundering procedures and functional finishes on removal of insecticides selected from three chemical classes. In RL. Barker & G.C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance ofprotective clothing, ASTM STP 900 (pp. 162-176). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

11.

Laughlin, J.M. , Easley, C.B. , Gold, R.E. , & Hill, R.M. (1986). Fabric parameters and pesticide characteristics that impact on dermal exposure of applicators. In R.L. Barker and G.C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing, ASTM STP 900(pp. 136-150). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials .

12.

Laughlin, J.M. , Easley, C.B. , Gold, R.E. , & Tupy, D.R. (1981).Methyl parathion transfer from contaminated fabrics to subsequent laundry and to laundry equipment. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 27, 518-523.

13.

Laughlin, J.M. , & Gold, RE (1988). Cleaning protective apparel to reduce pesticide exposure. Reviews of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology , 101, 93-119.

14.

Laughlin, J. , & Gold, R.E. (1989). Methyl parathion redeposition during laundering of functionally fmished protective apparel fabrics. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 42, 691-698.

15.

Obendorf, S.K. (1988). Electron microscopial study of soiling and soil removal. Textile Chemist and Colorist, 20(5), 11-15.

16.

Obendorf, S.K. , & Solbrig, C.M. (1986). Distribution of the organophosphorous pesticides malathion and methyl parathion on cotton/polyester fabrics after laundering as determined by electron microscopy. In R.L. Barker & G.C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance ofprotective clothing, ASTM STP 900 (pp. 187-204). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials .

17.

Southwick, J.W. , Mecham, H.D. , Cannon, P.M. , & Gortatowski, M.J. (1974). Pesticide residues in laundered clothing. Proceedings of 3rd Conference of Environmental Chemical and Human and Animal Health. Fort Collins, Colorado State University.