Salience of Disability Cues in Functional Clothing: A Multidimensional Approach

Abstract

This paper provides data on perceptions of functional clothing, augmenting a theoretical framework integrating symbolicinteractionist and cognitive approaches. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 322 physically disabled university students throughout the nation. One half of the students evaluated line drawings of only one view of each clothing style, whereas the other half rated illustrations presenting an additional view detailing the special, functional feature of the garment. The students responded more negatively to the functional clothing when the special feature was made salient. Factor analyses revealed the multidimensionality of meanings assigned to functional clothing, with evaluative, functional, and noticeability dimensions being most common. The complex, joint effects of sex, onset of disability, and wheelchair usage upon the students' responses point to the problematic nature of identifying common needs among persons with physical disabilities. Theoretical and real world implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman, B.M. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems, 28, 321-327.

Dallas, M.J. , and Wilson, P.A. (1981). Panty design alternatives for women and girls with physical disabilities. Home Economics Research Journal , 9, 336-346.

DeLong, M.R. , and Larntz, K. (1980). Measuring visual response to clothing. Home Economics Research Journal, 8, 281-293.

Elliott, G.C. ; Ziegler, H.L. ; Altman, B.M. ; and Scott, D.R. (1982). Understanding stigma: Dimensions of deviance and coping. Deviant Behavior, 3, 275-300.

Feather, B.L. ; Martin, B.B. ; and Miller, W.R. (1979). Attitudes toward clothing and self-concept of physically handicapped and able-bodied university men and women. Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 234-240.

Flatley, J.M. (1972). The relationship of selected characteristics of physical disability to the self-concepts of the physically disabled. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.

Freeman, C.M. ; Kaiser, S.B. ; and Wingate, S.B. (1985). Perceptions of functional clothing by persons with physical disabilities: A social-cognitive framework. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4 (1), 46-52.

Glaser, B.G. , and Strauss, A.L. (1964). Awareness contexts and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 29, 669-679.

Hansen, R.A. (1980). A self-perception interpretation of the effect of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on mail survey respondent behavior . Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 77-83.

10.

Harris, R.J. (1975). A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press.

11.

Kaigler-Evans, K. , and Damhorst, M.L. (1978). Impression formation: Use of descriptors of personal traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills 46, 903-906.

12.

Kaiser, S.B. (1985). The social psychology of clothing and personal adornment. New York: Macmillan.

13.

Kleck, R.E. , and Strenta, A. (1980). Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 861-873.

14.

Lerner, R.M. ; Orlos, J.B. ; and Knapp, J.R. (1976). Physical attractiveness, physical effectiveness, and self-concept in late adolescents. Adolescence, 11, 313-326.

15.

Matheson, M. (1981). The college handbook. New York : College Entrance Examination Board.

16.

Miller, F.G. (1982). Clothing and physical impairment: Joint effects on person perception. Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 265-270.

17.

Morrione, T.J. , and Farberman, H.A. (1981). Conversation with Herbert Blumer: I. Symbolic lnteraction, 4 (1), 113-128.

18.

Rees, D.W. ; Williams, L. ; and Giles, H. (1974). Dress style and symbolic meaning. International Journal of Symbology, 5, 1-8.

19.

Whisney, A.J. ; Winakor, G. ; and Wolins, L. (1979). Fashion preference: Drawings versus photographs . Home Economics Research Journal, 8, 138-150.

20.

Wicklund, R.A. , and Gollwitzer, P.M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion . Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Yu, J. , and Cooper, H. (1983). A qualitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 36-44.