The stakeholder influences on workplace compliance among Bangladeshi apparel factories across different compliance statuses were investigated. Six prominent stakeholders of the issue were identified: Buyers, owners, government, competitors, workers, and NGOs. Using the Accord’s inspection records, a modified stratified sampling, and an online survey method, responses from 43 "compliant" and 45 "behind-schedule" factories were analyzed. The result revealed that the factories behind the remedial process reported a higher degree of pressure from the government and NGOs as well as their workers than the compliant factories. The data confirmed the buyers as the most pressing stakeholder for both factory groups. The results suggest that the factories that are behind the schedule face an increased level of pressure from the local stakeholders, especially from their workers. The findings carry significant implications for the current transition to the government-controlled inspection and worker protections as well as for non-linear nature of stakeholder influences.
Accord (2020, June 1). Transition of the Accord Bangladesh office operations to the RMG Sustainability Council (RSC). News. https://bangladesh.wpengine.com/.
3.
AkterS.MarufM. Z. U.ChowdhuryS. K. (2014). Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and associated factors: A cross-sectional study of metal workers in Bangladesh. Work, 50(3), 363–370. Doi 10.3233/WOR-151992
4.
Al Farooque, O., van Zijl, T., Dunstan, K., & Karim, A. W. (2007). Corporategovernance in Bangladesh: Link between ownership and financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1453–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00657.x
5.
AnsaryM. A.BaruaU. (2015). Workplace safety compliance of RMG industry in Bangladesh: Structural assessment of RMG factory buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.008
6.
ArifM. M. H.MahmudA.IslamM. S. (2017). Deadly incidents in Bangladeshi apparel industry and illustrating the causes and effects of these incidents. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(5), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20170505.13
BerikG.RodgersY. V. D. M. (2010). Options for enforcing labour standards: Lessons from Bangladesh and Cambodia. Journal of International Development, 22(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1534
9.
DeeganC.IslamM. A. (2014). An exploration of NGO and media efforts to influence workplace practices and associated accountability within global supply chains. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.002
FreemanR. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
12.
FreemanR. E.ReedD. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018
13.
HelmigB.SpraulK.IngenhoffD. (2016). Under positive pressure: how stakeholder pressure affects corporate social responsibility implementation. Business and Society, 55(2), 151–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313477841
14.
HillsonR. (2015). Stratified sampling of neighborhood sections for population estimation: A case study of Bo City, Sierra Leone. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0132850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132850
15.
HossainM. A.ArefinS. (2015). The role of buyers compliance to improve workplace environment of garments factories in Bangladesh. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences, 3(4), 203–208.
16.
HyattD. G.BerenteN. (2017). Substantive or symbolic environmental strategies? Effects of external and internal normative stakeholder pressures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1212–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1979
17.
KamalY.DeeganC. (2013). Corporate social and environment-related governance disclosure practices in the textile and garment industry: evidence from a developing country. Australian Accounting Review, 23(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00205.x
18.
ManiV.GunasekaranA. (2018). Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.015
19.
MausumiN.RahmanM. M. (2018). Impact of stakeholder initiatives: Bangladesh garment industry. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 15(2), 31–41.
20.
Maas, S., Schuster, T., & Hartmann, E. (2018). Stakeholder pressures, environmental practice adoption and economic performance in the German third-party logistics industry-a contingency perspective. Journal of Business Economics, 88(2), 167-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0872-6
21.
MeixellM. J.LuomaP. (2015). Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0155
22.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Park-PoapsH.ReesK. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0156-3
25.
PremkumarG. (2003). A meta-analysis of research on information technology implementation in small business. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1302_2
26.
RoyV.SilvestreB. S.SinghS. (2020). Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: manufacturer's perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107672
27.
SarkisJ.Gonzalez-TorreP.Adenso-DiazB. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
28.
SevergniniE.GaldamézE. V. C.MoraesR. O. (2018). Satisfaction and contribution of stakeholders from the performance prism model. Brazilian Business Review, 15(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.2.2
VenkateshV. G.ZhangA.DeakinsE.VenkateshM. (2021). Antecedents of social sustainability noncompliance in the Indian apparel sector. International Journal of Production, 234, 108038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108038
31.
WadudZ.HudaF.AhmedN. (2014). Assessment of fire risk in the readymade garment industry in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Fire Technology, 50(5), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0349-2
32.
WangL.LiW.QiL. (2020). Stakeholder pressures and corporate environmental strategies: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 12(3), 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031172
WuX.YinW.WuC.LiY. (2017). Development and validation of a safety attitude scale for coal miners in China. Sustainability, 9(12), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122165
36.
ZhangR. P.LingardH.NevinS. (2015). Development and validation of a multilevel safety climate measurement tool in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 33(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1108451
