Student perceptions of a simulated store planning project set in a brick and mortar retail research lab were examined using the Concrete, Active, Primary-Abstract, Passive, Secondary Learning Potency Scales for Real and Simulated Situations by Bergsteiner and Avery (2014) as a framework. Quantitative seven-point Likert-type survey data (N = 30) and qualitative student reflection paper data (N = 27) were simultaneously collected and analyzed using SPSS and NVivo Qualitative Coding software. Students perceived the project’s environment and most of the activities performed within it as realistic or having a real-world connection, except for the large number of individuals involved in store planning, which led to an implication for designing simulated projects: To be concrete, simulated learning activities must have three specific tangible elements: a realistic environment (mock retail store), realistic activities (folding, hanging, and displaying merchandise), and realistic outcomes/consequences related to activities performed (increased or decreased foot traffic among visitors).
AdoborH.DaneshfarA. (2006). Management simulations: Determining their effectiveness. The Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610645135
3.
Arias-ArandaD. (2007). Simulating reality for teaching strategic management. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701486662
4.
ArringtonD. W. (2014). Simulation: Effectual and applicable learning in fashion curriculums. In Hunt-HurstP.Ramsamy-IranahS. (Eds.), Fashion and its multi-cultural facets [eBook edition] (pp. 185–193). Brill. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781848883093/BP000001.xml
BergsteinerH.AveryG. C. (2014). The twin-cycle experiential learning model: Reconceptualising Kolb’s theory. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2014.904782
8.
BergsteinerH.AveryG. C.NeumannR. (2010). Kolb’s experiential learning model: Critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370903534355
9.
Bishop-ClarkC.Dietz-UhlerB. (2012). Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A guide to the process, and how to develop a project from start to finish. Stylus.
10.
BrooksB. W.BursonT. E.RuddD. V. (2007). Student perception ratings of activities that supplement marketing computer simulations. In GordonP. J. (Ed.), Marketing management association 2007 educators’ conference proceedings. Proceedings of the marketing management association (pp. 58–62). Marketing Management Association.
11.
BurgessB. (2012). Pop-up retailing: The design, implementation, and five-year evolution of an experiential learning project. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312460763
12.
Buzzetto-MoreN.MitchellB. (2009). Student performance and perceptions in a web-based competitive computer simulation. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 73–90. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44823/
13.
ByunS. E.KimH.DuffeyM. (2012). A multicourse collaborative project within a global context: multidimensional learning outcomes for merchandising and interior design majors. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(3), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X12453646
14.
CashinW. E.DowneyR. G. (1995). Disciplinary differences in what is taught and in students’ perceptions of what they learn and of how they are taught. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Winter, (64), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956412
15.
ChickN. L.(Ed.). (2018). SoTL in action: illuminating critical moments of practice. Stylus.
16.
ChinJ.DukesR.GamsonW. (2009). Assessment in simulation and gaming: A review of the last 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40(4), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109332955
17.
CoxS. M.BursonT. E.BrooksB. W.RuddD. V. (2008). MBA Student perceptions of simulation complexity on learning and course satisfaction. In CherryJ. (Ed.), Marketing management association 2008 educators’ conference proceedings. Proceedings of the marketing management association (pp. 19–25). Marketing Management Association.
18.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
19.
DavisB. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass: A Wiley Imprint.
20.
FrazierB. J.CheekW. K. (2016). An industry view of competencies for entry-level merchandising jobs: Application of the ITAA meta-goals. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15622003
21.
HashimN.RazaliR. A.TaibN. A. M. (2019). Retail management skills gained through managing business simulation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i5/5888
22.
KangJ. Y. M. (2015). Virtual prototyping for planning from product design to retail store visualizations and simulations. In International Textile and Apparel Association, Inc. (Ed.), Celebrating the unique. Proceedings of the international Textile and apparel association annual conference (Vol. 72, pp. 1–2). Iowa State Digital Repository.
23.
KarnsG. L. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305276641
24.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
25.
NiehmL. S.FioreA. M.HurstJ.LeeY.SadacharA. (2015). Bridging the gap between entrepreneurship education and small rural businesses: An experiential service-learning approach. Journal of Business Entrepreneurship, 26(3) 129–161. https://repository.ulm.edu/jbe/vol26/iss3/6
26.
RegniR. (2010). Entrepreneurship: methods of preparing students in a classroom environment, through the use of simulation, the techniques of opening a small business. International Journal of Learning, 16(12), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i12/46786
27.
RiveraS. W.SimonsJ. T. (2008). Engaging students through extended simulations. Journal of Political Science Education, 4(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160802202805
28.
SadacharA.JablonS.NiehmL.HurstJ. (2017). Assessing students’ perceived success in attainment of course objectives in a retail merchandising class. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 45(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12201
29.
StanleyA. E.HiteC.WoodJ. (2018). Creating a virtual retail store using The Sims4™ programs in a visual merchandising course. In International Textile and Apparel Association, Inc. (Ed.), Re-imagine the renewable. Proceedings of the international Textile and apparel association annual conference (Vol. 75, No. 121, pp. 1-3). Iowa State Digital Repository.
30.
StudakC. M.AllisonD. L. (2016). Developing interdisciplinary partnerships based on cognitive learning styles. In International Textile and Apparel Association, Inc. (Ed.), Blending cultures. Proceedings of the international Textile and apparel association annual conference (Vol. 73, pp. 1-4). Iowa State Digital Repository.
VieraA. J.GarrettJ. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15883903/
33.
WanousJ. P.HudyM. J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810144003
