Revival of roller derby in the early 2000s garnered significant interest in the sport, and an extensive network of leagues began to form. By 2018, approximately 1,500 leagues were operating in North America, each with a unique logo. In this study, we focus on the league logos as a potent form of embodied fashion representation. Using content analysis, we examined all of the logos for U.S. Women’s Flat Track Derby Association–member leagues and have interpreted our findings through a critical cultural analysis. Revival of roller derby in the aughts has repositioned the sport as inclusive of diverse bodies; however, the logos tell a different story. League logos perpetuate hyperfeminized, thin-centric, white bodies—that is, the norms that derby athletes are performatively challenging through participation in the sport.
BarthesR. (2006). Myth today. In StoreyJ. (Ed.), Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader (pp. 293–302). Prentice Hall.
2.
Battle-WaltersK. (2004). Sheila’s shop: Working-class African American women talk about life, love, race, and hair. Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
BeaverT. D. (2012). “By the skaters, for the skaters” The DIY ethos of the roller derby revival. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 36(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723511433862
4.
BeaverT. D. (2016). Roller derby uniforms: The pleasures and dilemmas of sexualized attire. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(6), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690214549060
ButlerJ. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
7.
CarlsonJ. (2010). The female significant in all-women’s amateur roller derby. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27(4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.27.4.428
8.
ChalabaevA.SarrazinP.FontayneP.BoichéJ.Clément-GuillotinC. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluation criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593
10.
CoxB.ThompsonS. (2000). Multiple bodies: Sportswomen, soccer and sexuality. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269000035001001
11.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i252725
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
13.
Davis-DelanoL. R.PollockA.VoseJ. E. (2009). Apologetic behavior among female athletes a new questionnaire and initial results. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44(2–3), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690209335524
14.
DraftA. (2017). Sizing up skaters: An interrogation of body discourses in elite women’s flat track roller derby. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 25(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2015-0031
15.
EklundA.MasbergB. A. (2014). Participation in roller derby, the influence on body image. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 32(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X13511295
16.
EzzellM. B. (2009). “Barbie dolls” on the pitch: Identity work, defensive othering, and inequality in women’s rugby. Social Problems, 56(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.1.111
17.
FinleyN. J. (2010). Skating femininity: Gender maneuvering in women’s roller derby. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39(4), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241610364230
18.
FredricksJ. A.EcclesJ. S. (2005). Family socialization, gender, and sport motivation and involvement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.27.1.3
19.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
KaneM. J.LaVoiN. M.FinkJ. S. (2013). Exploring elite female athletes’ interpretations of sport media images: A window into the construction of social identity and “selling sex” in women’s sports. Communication & Sport, 1(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479512473585
24.
KauerK. J.KraneV. (2006). “Scary dykes” and “feminine queens”: Stereotypes and female collegiate athletes. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 15(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.15.1.42
25.
KraneV.ChoiP. Y. L.BairdS. M.AimarC. M.KauerK. J. (2004). Living the paradox: Female athletes negotiate femininity and muscularity. Sex Roles, 50(5/6), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018888.48437.4f
LintottS.IrvinS. (2016). Sex objects and sexy subjects: A feminist reclamation of sexiness. In IrvinS. (Ed.), Body aesthetics (pp. 299–318). Oxford University Press.
28.
MabeC. (2007). Roller derby: The history and all-girl revival of the greatest sport on wheels. Speck Press.
29.
McDonaldM. G. (2005). Mapping Whiteness and sport: An introduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 22(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.22.3.245
30.
McKinneyE.ShinE. (2016). Exploring criteria consumers use in evaluating their online formal wear rental experience: A content analysis of online reviews. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(4), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X16654269
31.
MosconeA. L.AmorimM. A.Le ScanffC.LeconteP. (2017). A model-drive approach to studying dissociations between body size mental representations in anorexia nervosa. Body Image, 20, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.11.003
32.
MusserA. J. (2016). Queering the pinup: History, femmes, and Brooklyn. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 22(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-3315229
33.
MustoM.McGannP. J. (2016). Strike a pose! The femininity effect in collegiate women’s sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2015-0034
34.
NeumanW. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
PavlidisA.FullagarS. (2016). Sport, gender and power: The rise of roller derby. Routledge.
38.
PelusoN. M. (2011). “Cruising for a bruising”: Women’s flat track roller derby. In BobelC.KwanS. (Eds.), Embodied resistance: Challenging the norms, breaking the rules (pp. 37–47). Vanderbilt University Press.
39.
Reddy-BestK. L.ChoiE.ParkH. (2018). Race, colorism, body size, body position, and sexiness: Critically analyzing women in fashion illustration textbooks. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 36(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X18779140
SchultzJ. (2014). Qualifying times: Points of change in US women’s sports. University of Illinois Press.
42.
StormsC. E. (2008). “There’s no sorry in roller derby”: A feminist examination of identity of women in the full contact sport of roller derby. The New York Sociologist, 3, 68–87.
ThompsonM. A.GrayJ. J. (1995). Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_6
45.
WeitzR. (2004). Rapunzel’s daughters: What women’s hair tells us about women’s lives. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
