Women have sought and received advice on how to dress for as long as they have been putting clothing on their bodies. One area in which women have received advice on dressing for their body type is the use of line in dress as an illusion to change the way body shape and size is perceived. This study was undertaken to gain a better historical understanding of advice on dressing for different body types between 1914 and 1961. Advice books and textbooks written for women from 1914 to 1961 that included prescriptive information on how to dress for various body types were explored. This time period was selected as it coincides with critical years in the growth and maturity of the home economic movement in the United States. A content analysis of 15 historical texts revealed trends found within the themes of body ideal, line as illusion, and figure types.
ClaytonR. B.RidgwayJ. L.HendrickseJ. (2017). Is plus size equal? The positive impact of average and plus-sized media fashion models on women’s cognitive resource allocation, social comparisons, and body satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 84, 406–422.
11.
CocksD. (1927). The etiquette of beauty. George H. Doran.
12.
ConnellL. J.UlrichP. V.BrannonE. L.AlexanderM.PresleyA. B. (2006). Body shape assessment scale: Instrument development for analyzing female figures. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 80–95.
13.
CraigH. T.RushO. D. (1941). Clothes with character. D.C. Heath.
14.
DooleyW. (1930). Clothing and style. D.C. Health.
15.
EicherJ. B.EvensonS. L. (2015). The visible self: Global perspectives on dress, culture and society. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
16.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
17.
FieldsJ. (1999). ‘Fighting the corsetless evil’: Shaping corsets and culture, 1900-1930. Journal of Social History, 33, 355–384.
18.
HempsteadL. (1938). Color and line in dress. Prentice-Hall.
19.
JungJ.LennonS. J.RuddN. A. (2001). Self-schema or self-discrepancy? Which best explains body image?Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 19, 171–184.
20.
KassarjianH. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8–18.
21.
KleppI. G. (2011). Slimming lines. Fashion Theory, 15, 451–480.
22.
Lees-MaffeiG. (2011). Dressing the part(y): 1950s domestic advice books and the studied performance of informal domesticity in the UK and the US. In FisherF.KeebleT.Lara-BetacourtP.MartinB. (Eds.), Performance, fashion and the modern interior (pp. 183–196). Berg.
MortonG. M. (1955). The arts of costume and personal appearance (2nd ed.). Wiley.
27.
PaolettiJ. (1982). Content analysis: Its application to the study of the history of costume. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1, 14–17.
28.
PickenM. B. (1918). The secrets of distinctive dress: Harmonious, becoming, and beautiful dress, its value and how to achieve it. International Textbook Press.
29.
RidgwayJ. L. (2018). Before and after avatar exposure: The impact of body scanning technology on body satisfaction, mood, and appearance management. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 36, 91–103.
30.
RidgwayJ. L.ParsonsJ.SohnM. (2017). Creating a more ideal self through the use of clothing: An exploratory study of women’s perceptions of optical illusion garments. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 35, 111–127.
31.
RyanM. G.PhilipsV. (1954). Clothes for you. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32.
StageS.VincentiV. B. (1997). Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession. Cornell University Press.
33.
WellsM. S. (1927). Clothes economy for well dressed women. Dodd, Mead.
34.
WinterburnF. H. (1914). Principles of correct dress. Harper & Brothers.
