The purpose of this study was to gain a baseline understanding of the terms currently used to define apparel for people living with disability (PLWD) and to encourage discussion for satisfying the apparel needs and wants of PLWD. The objectives were to conduct a literature review of the terms—adaptive, functional, universal design, and inclusive design—to survey how these terms are used in the marketplace, and to compare their usage to that in the literature. The results of a content analysis showed that adaptive is the most popular term used in the marketplace, yet, according to the literature review, reflects a medical model of disability. The term functional reflects a utilitarian purpose in the literature, with minimal application for PLWD in the marketplace. The terms universal and inclusive design are rarely used to define apparel for PLWD in the marketplace despite the heavy focus in the literature.
AnandN.ChandraR. (2016, July). Adaptive clothing for the rheumatoid arthritis patient. Paper Presented at the International Textiles & Apparel Sustainability Conference, July 16–21 2012, Mauritius, p. 8.
3.
AzherN.SaeedM.KalsoomS. (2012). Adaptive clothing for females with arthritis impairment. Journal of University Medical & Dental College, 3, 52–59.
4.
BanksK. (2001). Adaptive clothing—Preserves independence and assists the caregiver. Lippincott’s Case Management, 6, 243–245.
5.
CarrollK.GrossK. (2010). An examination of clothing issues and physical limitations in the product development process. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 39, 2–17. doi:10.1111/j.1552-3934.2010.02041.x
6.
CarrollK. E.KincadeD. H. (2007). Inclusive design in apparel product development for working women with physical disabilities. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 35, 289–315. doi:10.1177/1077727x07299675
Downe-WamboldtB. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321.
17.
FreemanC. M.KaiserS. B.WingateS. B. (1985). Perceptions of functional clothing by persons with physical disabilities: A social-cognitive framework. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4, 46–52.
GuptaD. (2011). Functional clothing-definition and classification. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 36, 321–326.
21.
HaegeleJ. A.HodgeS. (2016). Disability discourse: Overview and critiques of the medical and social models. Quest, 68, 193–206. doi:10.1080/00336297.2016.1143849
HiltonC. L.HarperJ. D.KuekerR. H.LangA. R.AbbacchiA. M.TodorovA.LavesserP. D. (2010). Sensory responsiveness as a predictor of social severity in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 937–945. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0944-8
25.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 177–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
KabelA.McBee-BlackK.DimkaJ. (2016). Apparel-related participation barriers: Ability, adaptation, and engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 2184–2192. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1123309
30.
LacyS.WatsonB.RiffeD.LovejoyJ. (2015). Issues and best practices in content analysis. Communication Studies Faculty Publications and Presentations, 8, 1–37.
31.
LambJ.KallalM. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 42–47. doi:10.1177/0887302x9201000207
32.
LoChangJ.LeeE. J.HelalN.JiangJ.EngstC.YassiA. (2004). Resource guide adaptive clothing (Resource Guide, pp. 1–67). Vancouver, Canada: Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare.
MaronN.KennisonR.HallN.ShorishY.MalenfantK. (2019, June). Creating a more inclusive future for scholarly communications: ACRL’s new research agenda for scholarly communications and research environment. Paper presented at the 23rd Edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Marseille, France. Abstract retrieved fromhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02142249
35.
McBee-BlackK.Ha-BrookshireJ. (2018). Exploring clothing as a barrier to workplace participation faced by people living with disabilities. Societies, 8, 1–19. doi:10.3390/soc8010019
36.
Men’s Zipper Pants for Arthritis, Catheters & Paralysis—2 Way Zippers & Easy Access Clothing. (2019, February12). [Retail]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.silverts.com
OliverM. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
39.
OliverM. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28, 1024–1026. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
40.
Ontario College of Art and Design, Inclusive Design Institute. (n.d.). [Web information page]. Retrieved fromhttps://inclusivedesign.ca/about/
41.
ParkJ.MorrisK.StannardC.HamiltonW. (2014). Design for many, design for me: Universal design for apparel products. The Design Journal, 17, 267–290. doi:10.2752/175630614x13915240576103
42.
PerssonH.ÅhmanH.YnglingA. A.GulliksenJ. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—Historical, methodological, and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 505–526. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
43.
ReichN.OttenP. (1991). Clothing and dressing needs of people with arthritis. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9, 34–40. doi:10.1177/0887302x9100900405
44.
RoofK.OleruN. (2008). Public health: Seattle and King county’s push for the built environment. Journal of Environmental Health, 75, 24–27.
45.
Rosenblad-WallinE. (1985). User-oriented product development applied to functional clothing design. Applied Ergonomics, 16, 279–287.
46.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2009). Research method for business students (5th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
StoryM. F.MuellerJ. L.MaceR. L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities (Rev. ed.). (Guide No. H133A40006, p. 172). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Raleigh, Center for Universal Design.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Toward a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
WallerS.BradleyM.HoskingI.ClarksonP. J. (2015). Making the case for inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 297–303. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.012
55.
YinM.ShaewitzD.OvertonC.SmithD.-M. (2018). A hidden market: The purchasing power of working-age adults with disabilities (p. 38). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
56.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
