The purpose of this research was to understand male college students’ experiences in a traditionally female academic major, such as apparel. Based on the analyses and interpretation of interviews with 22 male students from an apparel program, two topical areas emerged: (a) attitudes of toward male apparel students; and (b) experiences of male students in an apparel program. The first topical area describes what male apparel students encounter when they inform parents, friends, and people around them about their academic major. The second topical area portrays male student experiences in a major with an overwhelming majority of peers being women. The study contributes to the literature on men in non-traditional occupations. Such understanding is a precursor for minimizing gender-stereotypic career boundaries. Implications and recommendations for apparel program instructors, advisors, administrators, and career counselors are presented.
BarberF. (1994). Territories of difference: Irish women artists. Third Text, 8, 65–75.
2.
BixA. S. (2002). Equipped for life: Gendered technical training and consumerism in home economics, 1920–1980. Technology and Culture, 43, 728–754.
3.
BrownB. (2009). Men in nursing: Re-evaluating masculinities, re-evaluating gender. Contemporary Nurse, 33, 120–129.
4.
ChuangN. K.WalkerK.CaineN. (2009). Student perceptions of career choices: The impact of academic major. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 27, 18–29.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CrossS.BagilholeB. (2002). Girl’s jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity, and nontraditional occupations. Gender Work & Organization, 9, 204–226.
7.
EaglyA. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644–658.
8.
EvansJ.FrankB. (2003). Contradictions and tensions: Exploring relations of masculinities in the numerically female-dominated nursing profession. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 11, 277–292.
9.
FunkL. C.WerhunC. D. (2011). “You’re such a girl!” The psychological drain of the gender-role harassment of men. Sex Roles, 65, 13–22.
10.
GalbraithM. (1992). Understanding career choices of men in elementary education. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 246–253.
11.
GoffmanE. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301–331.
12.
GoodeyW. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.
13.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
14.
HodgesN.KarpovaE. (2009). Making a major decision: An exploration of why students enroll in fashion programmes. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 2, 47–57.
15.
HodgesN.KarpovaE.LentzH. (2010). An investigation of women’s early career experiences in the textile and apparel industries. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 39, 75–89.
16.
IsaacsD.PooleM. (1996). Being a man and becoming a nurse: Three men’s stories. Journal of Gender Studies, 5, 39–47.
17.
KanterR. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.
18.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor of qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
19.
LevantR. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. American Psychologist, 66, 762–776.
20.
MastekaasaA.SmebyJ. (2008). Educational choice and persistence in male- and female-dominated fields. Higher Education, 55, 189–202.
21.
McCrackenG. (1988). Culture and consumption. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
MullanB.HarrisonJ. (2008). Male and female nursing applicants’ attitudes and expectations towards their future careers in nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 527–539.
23.
PampakaM.WilliamsJ.HutchesonG. (2012). Measuring students’ transition into university and its association with learning outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 1041–1071.
24.
PleckJ. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
PleckJ. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In LevantR. F.PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
SimpsonR. (2005). Men in non-traditional occupations: Career entry, career orientation, and experience of role strain. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12, 363–380.
27.
SpiggleS. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491–501.
28.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
WilliamsC. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.
