Reflecting two ways of impacting a garment sizing system-by modifying the body sizing table, and by modifying the ease amounts added (at bust and hip only), 4 garment sizing systems presenting the combinations of a standard (ASTM D5585-95R01) or a modified body sizing table, each with constant or size-dependent ease amounts across sizes, were compared by testing their relative (as opposed to absolute) performance in fit tests with 81 study participants. Test garments (princess style jackets), sizes 2-16, were manufactured for each system (32 garments). Each participant was photographed in the best-fitting size garment from each system. Three fit experts ranked the 4 garments by fit for each study participant. Statistical analysis indicated better overall performance of systems based on size-dependent ease (but not within each size group) and of the modified table (significantly better for participants with small hip-bust drop and not significantly for participants with large drop).
AshdownS.LokerS.SchoenfelderK.Lyman-ClarkeL. (2004). Using 3D scans for fit analysis. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4, 1–12.
2.
AshdownS.O’ConnellE. K. (2006). Comparison of test protocols for judging the fit of mature women’s apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 137–146.
3.
AshdownS.WatkinsS. (1992). Movement analysis as the basis for the development and evaluation of a protective coverall design for asbestos abatement. In McBriartyJ. P.HenryN. W. (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing: Fourth volume. ASTM STP 1133 (pp. 660–674). Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.
4.
BougourdJ. (2007). Sizing systems, fit models and target markets. In AshdownS. (Ed.), Sizing in clothing: Developing effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing (pp. 108–151). Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
5.
ByeE.LaBatK. (2005). Analysis of apparel industry fit sessions. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4, 1–5.
6.
DesMarteauK. (2000). Pre-production & CAD: Let the fit revolution begin. Bobbin, 42, 42–56.
7.
ErwinM. D. (1949). Clothing for moderns. New York, NY: Macmillan.
8.
GordonC. (1986). Anthropometric sizing and fit testing of a single battledress uniform for U.S. Army men and women. In BarkerR. L.ColettaG. C. (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing ASTM STP 900 (pp. 581–592). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
9.
International Organization for Standardization. (1991). Standard sizing systems for clothes(No. ISO/TR 10652:1991). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
10.
KirkW.IbrahimS. M. (1966). Fundamental relationship of fabric extensibility to anthropometric requirements and garment performance. Textile Research Journal, 36, 37–47.
11.
KoblyakovaE. B. (Ed.). (1980). Osnovi konstruirovaniya odejdi. Moskva, Russia: Legkaya industriya.
12.
KohnI. L.AshdownS. (1998). Using video capture and image analysis to quantify apparel fit. Textile Research Journal, 68, 17–26.
13.
LokerS.AshdownS.SchoenfelderK. (2005). Size-specific analysis of body scan data to improve apparel fit [Electronic version]. [Electronic access]. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4, 1–13.
14.
McConvilleJ. T. (1986). Anthropometric fit testing and evaluation. In BarkerR. L.ColettaG. C. (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing ASTM STP900 (pp. 556–568). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
15.
MeilgaardM. C.CivilleG. V.CarrB. T. (2007). Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
16.
NewcombB.IstookC. (2004). A case for the revision of U.S. sizing standards. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4, 1–6.
17.
O’BrienR.SheltonW. (1941). Miscellaneous publication No. 454. Women’s measurements for garment and pattern construction. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
18.
PetrovaA. (2007). Creating sizing systems. In AshdownS. (Ed.), Sizing in clothing: Developing effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing (pp. 57–87). Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
19.
PetrovaA. (2008). Ease values in garment sizing: Analysis and application for the princess style jacket(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
20.
PetrovaA.AshdownS. (2008). Three-dimensional body scan data analysis: Body size and shape dependence of ease values for pants’ fit. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26, 227–252.
21.
PetrovaA.AshdownS.LokerS.SchoenfelderK. (2003). Anthropometric analysis of the seated body with respect to fit of apparel. Paper presented at the International Textile and Apparel Association, Savannah, GA.
22.
ReichN.GoldsberryE. (1993). Development of body measurement tables for women 55 years and older and the relationship to ready-to-wear garment size. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM Institute for Standards Research.
23.
WatkinsS. (1995). Clothing. The portable environment. (2nd ed.). Iowa State University Press.
24.
WinksJ. M. (1997). Clothing sizes. International standardization. Manchester, England: The Textile Institute.
25.
YuW. (2004). Objective evaluation of clothing fit. In FanJ.YuW.HunterL. (Eds.), Clothing appearance and fit: Science and technology (pp. 72–88). Cambridge, England: Woodland Publishing Limited.
