Based on the schema and attribution theories, this study examined hypotheses addressing the effects of cause-brand fit and campaign new source on consumers' attitudes toward a cause-brand alliance by modifying consumers' perceptions of the brand's motivation to engage in the alliance. An online experiment was conducted with a national sample of 742 college students using a 2 (cause vs. brand message source) x 2 (low vs. high cause-brand fit) between-subjects design based on hypothetical cause-brand alliance scenarios. Findings indicate that cause-brand fit influences cause-brand alliance attitude by increasing consumers' perceived altruistic brand motivations, whereas campaign news source did not have a significant impact on cause-brand alliance attitude. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed.
BaroneM. J.MiyazakiA. D.TaylorK. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 248–262.
2.
BasilD. Z.HerrP. M. (2006). Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: An empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 391–403.
3.
Bigné-AlcañizE.Currás-PérezR.Sánchez-GarcíaI. (2009). Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: The moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 18, 437–447.
4.
Becker-OlsenK. L.CudmoreA.HillR. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.
5.
Becker-OlsenK. L.HillR. P. (2006). The impact of sponsor fit on brand equity: The case of nonprofit service providers. Journal of Service Research, 9, 73–83.
6.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
7.
BrownT. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
11.
ChangC.-T. (2011). Guilt appeals in cause-related marketing: The subversive roles of product type and donation magnitude. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 587–616.
12.
ClarkJ. K.EvansA. T.WegenerD. T. (2011). Perceptions of source efficacy and persuasion: Multiple mechanisms for source effects on attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 596–607.
DeanD. H. (2002). Associating the corporation with a charitable event through sponsorship: Measuring the effects on corporate community relations. Journal of Advertising, 31, 77–78.
15.
DrumwrightM. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60, 71–87.
16.
EagleyA. H.WoodW.ChaikenS. (1978). Causal influences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424–435.
17.
EllenP. S.WebbD. J.MohrL. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157.
18.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
19.
GrauS. L.FolseJ. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM). Journal of Advertising, 36, 19–33.
20.
GuptaS.PirschJ. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 314–326.
21.
HallC. (2007, April 5). Brand power; the top 12 most searched for apparel brands online in February, Women's Wear Daily, 193(72), p.12.
22.
HairJ. F.Jr.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR.TathamR. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
HamlinR. P.WilsonT. (2004). The impact of cause branding on consumer reactions to products: Does product/cause ‘fit’ really matter?Journal of Marketing Management, 20, 663–681.
24.
HawleyJ. (2006). Digging for diamonds: A conceptual framework for understanding reclaimed textile products. Clothing and Textiles Research Journa, 24, 262–275.
25.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
26.
HoefflerS.KellerK. L. (2003). The marketing advantages of strong brands. Brand Management, 10, 421–445.
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
28.
HyllegardK. H.OgleJ. P.YanR.-N.AttmannJ. (2010). Exploring Gen Y responses to an apparel brand’s use of cause-related marketing: Does message matter when it comes to support for the breast cancer cause?Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28, 19–34.
29.
JosephsonN. (1984). American Express raises corporate giving to marketing art. Advertising Age, 55, 10–11.
30.
KelleyH. H.MichelaJ. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
31.
LaffertyB. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a CRM campaign when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60, 447–453.
32.
LaffertyB. A.EdmondsonD. R. (2009). Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ads: Does it really matter?Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17, 129–141.
33.
LaffertyB. A.GoldsmithR. E. (2005). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause?Journal of Business Research, 58, 423–429.
34.
LiiY.-S.LeeM. (2011). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of a firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 69–81.
35.
MenonS.KahnB. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 316–327.
36.
MohrL. A.WebbD. J.HarrisK. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–72.
37.
MooreD. J.MowenJ. C.ReardonR. (1994). Multiple sources in advertising appeals: When product endorsers are paid by the advertising sponsor. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 234–243.
38.
MoosmayerD. C.FulijahnA. (2010). Consumer perceptions of cause related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 543–549.
39.
MyersB.KwonW.-S (2012). A Model of Antecedents of Consumers' Post Brand Attitude upon Exposure to a Cause-Brand Alliance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40.
NanX.HeoK. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36, 63–74.
41.
O’ DonnellJ. (2006, October 11). Gen Y sits on top of consumer food chain; they’re savvy shoppers with money and influence. USA Today, p. 3B.
42.
OsgoodC. E.TannebaumP. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review62, 42–55.
43.
ParkH.LennonS. J. (2006). The organizational factors influencing social responsible apparel buying/sourcing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 229–247.
44.
RifonN. J.ChoiS. M.TrimbleC. S.LiH. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship. Journal of Advertising, 33, 29–42.
45.
RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL.S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1–15). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46.
SamuS.WymerW. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance on cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 62, 432–440.
47.
SimmonsC. J.Becker-OlsenK. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70, 154–169.
48.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
49.
SpearsN.SinghS. N. (2004). Measuring Attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26, 53–66.
50.
TsaiS.-P. (2009). Modeling strategic management for cause-related marketing. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 27, 649–665.
51.
ThibautJ. W.RieckenH. W. (1955). Some determinants and consequences of the perception of social causality. Journal of Personality, 24, 113–133.
52.
TrimbleC. S.RifonN. J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of compatibility in cause-related marketing messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 29–47.
VaradarajanP. R.MenonA. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52, 58–74.
55.
VernonK. (2010). Minority mobile and social media use by the numbers. Everywhere All the Time. Retrieved June 3, 2011, fromhttp://everywhereallthetime.com/?p=272
56.
WeinerB. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
57.
WeinerB. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 382–387.
58.
WeinerJ. L.LaForgeR. W.GoolsbyJ. R. (1990). Personal communication in marketing: An examination of self-interest contingency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 227–231.
59.
YalchR. F.Elmore-YalchR. (1984). The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 522–527.
