A Foucauldian feminist theoretical perspective was selected to examine female flashing behavior and male audience response within the microenvironment of a college homecoming celebration. Data were collected using ethnographic fieldwork techniques in the midst of sometimes near-riot conditions in a blocked-off street in the bar district adjoining the campus. Additional qualitative research methods included participant observation, interviews with male and female participants and observers, analysis of police videotapes, and interviews with police officers. Interpretive results supported the expanding of Kennedy's definition of provocative dress to include body-revealing behaviors when practiced within social contexts. Analysis further indicated that flashing within this microenvironment served to reinforce patterns of hegemonic male sexuality focused on sexual objectification of women rather than serving to challenge male-centered sexuality through an expression of female sexual agency.
Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R.J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108-126.
2.
Adams-Curtis, L.E., & Forbes, G.B. (2004). College women's experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(2), 91-122.
3.
Alexander, C.S. (1980). The responsible victim: Nurses' perceptions of victims of rape. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 22-33.
4.
Bartky, S.L. (1991). Narcissism, femininity, and alienation. In S. L. Bartky (Ed.), Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression (pp. 33-44). New York: Routledge.
5.
Bordo, S. (1991). “Material girl”: The effacements of postmodern culture. In L. Goldstein (Ed.), The female body: Figures, styles, speculations (pp. 106-130). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Brooks, G.R. (1997). The centerfold syndrome. In R. F. Lavant & G. R. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex (pp. 28-60). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Burgess, R. (1984). Field research: A source book and field manual . London: George Allen and Unwin .
8.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
9.
Cahoon, D., & Edmonds, E. (1987). Estimates of opposite-sex first impressions related to females' clothing styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 406.
10.
Calogero, R.M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16-21.
11.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Edmonds, E.M., & Cahoon, D.E. (1984). Female clothes preferences related to male sexual interest. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 171-173.
13.
Egan, D.R. (2000). The phallus palace: Stripping spaces, desiring subjects, and the fantasy of objects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, Boston.
14.
Ellis, B.J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527-555.
15.
Fiore, A., & DeLong M. (1984). Use of apparel as cues to perception of personality . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 267-274.
16.
Fisher, B., Cullen, F., & Turner, M. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice , Office of Justice Programs.
17.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power and knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
18.
Fredrickson, B.L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
19.
Goodchilds, J., & Zellman, G. (1984). Sexual signaling and sexual aggression in adolescent relationships. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstain (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 233-243). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
Haug, F. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory . London: Verso.
21.
Hite, M. (1988). Writing—and reading—the body: Female sexuality and recent feminist fiction. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 121-122.
22.
Johnson, K.P. (1995). Attributions about date rape: Impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(3), 292-310.
23.
Johnston, J.E. (1997). Appearance obsession: Women's reactions to men's objectification of their bodies. In R. F. Lavant & G. R. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex (pp. 61-83). New York: John Wiley .
24.
Kennedy, D. (1993). Sexy dressing etc: Essays on the power and politics of cultural identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Lennon, S., Johnson, K.P., & Schultz, T.L. (1999). Forging linkages between dress and law in the U.S., Part I: Rape and sexual harassment. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17, 144-156.
26.
Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press .
27.
Litewka, J. (1974). The socialized penis. Liberation , 18(7), 61-69.
28.
Lynch, A. (1999). Transforming gender through critical research: An analysis of enacted attractiveness among undergraduate college women. Citrus Heights, CA: International Textile and Apparel Association.
29.
Lynch, A., & Fleming, W.M. (2005). Bystander approaches: Empowering students to model ethical sexual behavior. The Journal of Family and ConsumerSciences, 97(3), 27-33.
30.
MacKinnon, C. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7, 515-533.
31.
Mead, R. (2002). Endless spring: How much spring break can anyone stand?The New Yorker, 78(16), 50-56.
32.
Riordan, E. (2001). Commodified agents and empowered girls: Consuming and producing feminism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 25(3), 279-297.
33.
Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York: Routledge.
34.
Scott, L.M. (1993). Fresh lipstick: Rethinking images of women in advertising. Media Studies Journal, 7, 141-155.
35.
Sterling, A.C. (1995). Undressing the victim: The intersection of evidentiary and semiotic meanings of women's clothing in rape trials. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 7, 87-132.
36.
Visweswaran, K. (1996). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Delhi, India : Oxford University Press.
37.
Wilson, E. (1990). Deviant dress. Feminist Review , 35, 68-74.
38.
Wolf, J. (2006, April 23). & you thought Abercrombie and Fitch was pushing it?New York Times Magazine, pp. 58-63.
39.
Workman, J.E., & Orr, R. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14(4), 276-284.
