Alternative trade organizations (ATOs) adhere to a set of socially responsible business practices fostering empowerment and improved quality of life for their workers. The researchers explored the ATO claim by asking, How has artisan work with Market Place: Handwork of India affected the capabilities and well-being of women textile artisans in India? A second question addressed women's household responsibilities in relation to work expectations. Photoelicitation interviews were conducted with 31 artisans who were asked to take photographs depicting “who you are, your work, your family, and the neighborhood where you live.” Charting of the women's daily activities into household responsibilities, cooking, and artisan work revealed a nonlinear nature to women's days. The interviews offered insights about newfound capabilities, which contributed to individual and household well-being in the form of more attractive living spaces, better schooling, interpersonal support, improved health, and conceptualizing a life of choices and duties.
Basu, A. M. (1992). The status of women and the quality of life among the poor. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16, 249-267.
2.
Basu, K. (1995). Marketing developing society crafts. A framework for analysis and change. In J. A. Costa & G. J. Bamossy (Eds.), Marketing in a multicultural world (pp. 257-298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329-352.
4.
Brinkerhoff, M. B., Fredell, K. A., & Frideres, J. S. (1997). Basic minimum needs, quality of life, and selected correlates: Explorations in villages in northern India. Social Indicators Research, 42, 245-281.
5.
Chambers, R. C. (1997). Whose reality counts?Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
6.
Dana, L. P. (2000). Creating entrepreneurs in India. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(1), 86-91.
7.
Dhamija, J. (1989). Women and handcrafts: Myth and reality. In E. Leonard (Ed.), Seeds: Supporting women's work in the Third World (pp. 195-211). New York: Feminist Press.
8.
Dickson, M. A., & Littrell, M. A. (1998). Organizational culture for small textile and apparel businesses in Guatemala. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 16(2), 68-78.
9.
Dickson, M. A., & Littrell, M. A. (2003). Measuring quality of life of apparel workers in Mumbai, India: Quantitative and qualitative data. In M. J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli (Eds.), Advances in quality-of-life theory and research (pp. 211-232). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
10.
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 1064-1071.
11.
English, F. W. (1988). The utility of the camera in qualitative inquiry. Educational Research, 47(4), 8-15.
12.
Frater, J. (2002, September). Contemporary embroideries of Rabaris of Kutch: Economic and cultural viability. Paper presented at the Eighth Biennial Symposium of the Textile Society of America, Smith College, North Hampton, MA.
13.
Glazer, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Grimes, K. M., & Milgram, B. L. (Eds.). (2000). Artisans and cooperatives: Developing alternative trade for the global economy. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
15.
Heisley, D. D., & Levy, S. J. (1991). Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 257-272.
16.
Indrayan, A., Wysocki, M. J., Chawla, A., Kumar, R., & Singh, N. (1999). 3-decade trend in human development index in India and its major states. Social Indicators Research, 46, 91-120.
17.
International Federation for Alternative Trade. (2003). Fair trade definition. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://www.ifat.org/dwr/definition.html
18.
Joshi, T. (2001). Significance of the crafts sector in India. Crafts Workshop: India. Retrieved September 18, 2003, from http://Inweb18.worldbank.org
19.
Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development.New York:Verso.
20.
Karp, D. A. (1999). Social science, progress, and the ethnographer's craft. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(6), 597-609.
21.
Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2001). Sharing the experience of mobility-disabled consumers: Building understanding through the use of ethnographic research methods. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(4), 430-464.
22.
Liebl, M., & Roy, T. (2000). Handmade in India: Preliminary analysis of crafts producers and craft production in India: Issues, initiatives, interventions. Report prepared for the Policy Sciences Center, Inc. as part of the “Multi-Country Crafts Study” Project. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://Inweb18.worldbank.org
23.
Liebl, M., & Roy, T. (2001). Summary of main conclusions related to project goals. Crafts Workshop: India. Retrieved September 18, 2003, from http://lnweb18.worldbank.org
24.
Littrell, M. A., & Dickson, M. A. (1997). Alternative trading organizations: Shifting paradigm in a culture of social responsibility. Human Organization, 56(3), 344-352.
25.
Littrell, M. A., & Dickson, M. A. (1999). Social responsibility in the global market: Fair trade of cultural products. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Lynd, M. (2000). The international craft market: A double-edged sword for Guatemalan Maya women. In K. M. Grimes & B. L. Milgram (Eds.), Artisans and cooperatives: Developing alternative trade for the global economy (pp. 65-83). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
27.
Mac Henry, R. (2000). Building on local strengths: Nepalese fair trade textiles. In K. M. Grimes & B. L. Milgram (Eds.), Artisans and cooperatives: Developing alternative trade for the global economy (pp. 25-44). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
28.
Mc Cracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Morris, W. F., Jr. (1996). Handmade money: Latin American artisans in the marketplace. Washington, DC: Organization of American States.
30.
Mukherjee, R. (1981). On the quality of life in India. An exploratory survey. Social Indicators Research, 9, 455-476.
31.
Nash, J. (2000). Postcript: To market, to market. In K. M. Grimes & B. L. Milgram (Eds.), Artisans and cooperatives: Developing alternative trade for the global economy (pp. 175-179). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
32.
Paige-Reeves, J. (1998). Alpaca sweater design and marketing: Problems and prospects for cooperative knitting organizations in Bolivia. Human Organization, 57(1), 83-93.
33.
Peiris, K. (1997). Weaving a future together: Women and participatory development. Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Books.
34.
Roncoli, C., & Sendze, M. (1997). Visions and voices of Donsin: How farmers of Burkina Faso participate as photographers. Practicing Anthropology, 19(3), 26-30.
35.
Rosenbaum, B. (2000). Of women, hope, and angels: Fair trade and artisan production in a squatter settlement in Guatemala City. In K. M. Grimes & B. L. Milgram (Eds.), Artisans and cooperatives: Developing alternative trade for the global economy (pp. 85-106). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
36.
Rosenbaum, B., & Goldin, L. (1997). New exchange processes in the international market: The re-making of Maya artisan production in Guatemala. Museum Antropology, 21(2), 72-82.
37.
Roy, T. (2001). Overview of the economics of the crafts industries. Crafts Workshop: India. Retrieved September 18, 2003, from http://lnweb18.worldbank.org
38.
Stephen, L. (1991). Culture as a resource: Four cases of self-managed indigenous craft production in Latin America. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(1), 101-130.
39.
Tice, K. (1995). Kuna crafts, gender, and the global economy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
40.
Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1987). Deep meaning in possessions: Qualitative research from the consumer behavior odyssey (videotape). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
41.
Zeller, R. C. (1990). Photographing the self: Methods for observing personal orientations.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
