Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes an innovative career exploration project that uses collaborative learning methods and technology to increase design and merchandising students' understanding of career options and progression in fashion industries. The authors describe activities used to engage students in creating a career matrix (Zinser, 2001), a visual tool that uses a spreadsheet style format to display functions in a typical organization horizontally and the education, experience, and salary range at each level vertically. The activity, which has been assigned at two universities, requires student teams to conduct research about careers in the fashion industry using the primary, secondary, retail, and auxiliary industry sectors model. Students display their findings in a career matrix adapted by the authors for the fashion industry. Participants are engaged in active learning as they develop and improve their information literacy skills through information processing, critical thinking, problem solving, and research. Students report increased awareness of the breadth of careers in the industry and an appreciation of the education and experience required for success and career progression.

Keywords

Active Learning College Students Fashion Careers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of College and Research Libraries . (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. College and Research Libraries News, 61, 207-215.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I New York: Longmans, Green.

Boulmetis, J. (2000). Action research in adult education. Adult Learning, 11(3), 2-2. Retrieved February 10, 2003, from Academic Search Elite database.

Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University . (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universitiesRetrieved February 25, 2003, from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/

Burns, L. D. & Bryant, N. O. (2002). The business of fashion New York: Fairchild.

Cantore, J. (2000). Hot jobs in fashion. Career World, 28(6), 4-4.

Conley, D. T. (2002). Preparing students for life after high school. Educational Leadership, 59(7), 60-63.

Conroy, C. (1997). Influences on career choice of rural youth and resulting implications for career development programming. Vocational Education Research, 22(1), 3-19.

Cooper, J. (1990). Cooperative Learning and College Teaching: Tips from the Trenches. Teaching Professor, 4(5), 1-2.

10.

Cuseo, J. (2002). Igniting student involvement, peer interaction, and teamwork: A taxonomy of specific cooperative learning structures and collaborative learning strategies Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

11.

Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

12.

Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle (2nd Ed). New York: Norton.

13.

Fiechtner, S. B. , and Davis, E. A. (1992). “Why Some Groups Fail: A Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups.” In A. Goodsell , M. Maher , V. Tinto , and Associates (eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. University Park: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University.

14.

Frings, G. (1999). Fashion: From concept to consumer (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

15.

Han, H. (2003). Vault Career Guide to the Fashion Industry. New York: Vault, Inc.

16.

International Technology Education Association (1993). Technology education: The new basics Reston, VA.

17.

Jarnow, J. , & Dickerson, K. G. (1996). Inside the fashion business (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

18.

Johnson, R. T. , & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24, 31-32.

19.

Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. , and Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity ASHE-FRIC Higher Education Report No (4) Washington, D.C.: George Washington University.

20.

Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. , & Smith, K. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

21.

Kurfi ss, J. C. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilitiesASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No (2). Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED300445)

22.

Rath, P. M. , Peterson, J. , Greensley, P. , & Gill, P. (1994). Introduction to fashion merchandising Albany, NY: Delmar.

23.

Salemi, M. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Southern Economic Journal, 68(3), 721-731.

24.

Smith, K. A. Cooperative Learning Groups . (1986). In S. F. Schomberg (Ed.), Strategies for Active Teaching and Learning in University Classrooms (pp. 18-26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

25.

Stone, E. (1999). The dynamics of fashion. New York: Fairchild.

26.

Totten, S. , Sills, T. , Digby, A. , & Russ, P. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research New York: Garland.

27.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . Occupational outlook handbookAvailable from U.S. Department of Labor Web site: http://www.bls.gov/oco/

28.

Warren, R. G. (1997). Engaging students in active learning. About campus, 2(1), 16-20.

29.

Zinser, R. (December/January 2001). Developing a career matrix for technology students. The Technology Teacher, 60(4), 9-12.

Fashion Industry Career Matrix: Encouraging Students to Explore Fashion-Related Careers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References