The purpose of this study was to discover what motivational factors are important to contemporary textile handcrafters who continue to produce artifacts similar to those produced by previous generations of women. Thirty-nine women completed questionnaires and 18 women also participated in in-depth interviews. Participation in guild activities and comparison to contemporary and historic literature provided further context for analysis. Three general themes emerged as useful for interpretation of participants' responses. First, participation in various textile handcraft activities provided the women an opportunity to identify their place in the world. Secondly, the production of the items brought meaning to the women. Finally, tangible and intangible benefits were gained from the end products of their labor. These objects are valued by their creators as symbols of self, who feel textile handcrafts are special because they are made with love and are connected to personal histories.
Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life: Women's work, women's consciousness, and the meaning of daily experienceAmherst: University of Massachusetts.
2.
Arpad, S. S. (1988). “Pretty much to suit ourselves”: Midwestern women's naming experience through domestic arts. In M. F. Motz & P. Brown (Eds.), Making the American home: Middle class women and domestic material culture, 1840-1940 (pp. 11-26). Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Press.
3.
Barber, E. W. (1994). Women's work, the first 20,000 years: Women, cloth, and society in early timesNew York: Norton.
4.
Bassett, L. Z., & Larkin, J. (1988). Northern comfort: New England's early quiltsNashville, TN: Rutlidge Press.
5.
Bercaw, N. D. (1991). Solid objects/mutable meanings: Fancywork and the construction of the bourgeois culture, 1840-1880. Winterthur Portfolio, 26(4), 231-248.
6.
Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving behavior. In J. Sheth (Ed.), Research in marketing (2, pp. 95-126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
Belk, R. W. (1981). Effects of gift-giving involvement on gift selection strategies. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (9, pp. 408-412). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
8.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(9), 139-168.
9.
Bresenhan, K. (2002). America from the heart: Quilters remember September 11, 2001Lafayette, CA: C & T Publ.
10.
Brumbeau, J. (2000). The quiltmaker's giftDuluth, MN: Pfeifer-Hamilton.
11.
Cerny, C. A., Eicher, J. B., & DeLong, M. R. (1993). Quiltmaking and the modern guild: A cultural idiom. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 16-25.
12.
Clark, R., Knepper, G. W., & Ronsheim, E. (1991). Quilts in community: Ohio's traditionsNashville, TN: Rutlidge Hill Press.
13.
Crews, J. S. (1979). Designs that countLittle Rock, AR: Leisure Arts.
14.
Crews, P. C., & Naugle, R. C. (1991). Nebraska quilts and quiltmakersLincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
15.
Crochet Guild of America (2003). Crocheters respond to the 9-11-01 attacksRetrieved January 13, 2004, from http://www.crochet.org
16.
Cross, M. B. (1993). Treasures in the trunk: Quilts of the Oregon TrailNashville, TN: Rutledge Press.
17.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). Why we need things. In S. Lubar & W. D. Kingery (Eds.), History from things: Essays on material culture (pp. 20-29). New York: Smithsonian.
18.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the selfCambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
19.
Designs by Gloria and Pat. (1977). Occasions that countSumter, SC: Author.
20.
Davis, G. R. (1997). Women's quilts and diaries: Creative expression and personal resource. Uncoverings: The 1997 Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, 18, 213-230.
21.
de Toqueville, A. (1956). Democracy in America (Edited and abridged by R. D. Heffner). New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1835)
22.
E-tatters. (2004). E-tattersRetrieved May 15, 2004, from http//:groups.yahoo.com/group/e-tatters
23.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culturesNew York: Basic Books.
24.
Gillam, L. (1994). Teach me to stitchLittle Rock, AR: Leisure Arts.
25.
Gunn, V. (1992). The Art Needlework movement: An experiment in self-help for middle-class women, 1870-1900. The Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(3), 54-63.
26.
Hedges, E. (1987). Essay. In P. Ferrero, E. Hedges, & J. Silber. Hearts and hands: The influence of women and quilts on American societySan Francisco: The Quilt Digest Press.
27.
Hillard, V. A. (1994). Census, consensus, and the commodification of form: The NAMES Project Quilt. In C. B. Torsney & J. Elsley (Eds.), Quilt culture: Tracing the pattern (pp. 112-124). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
28.
Hirschman, E. (1985). Primitive aspects of consumption in modern American society. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 142-154.
29.
Hobby Industry Association. (2003). Nationwide craft and hobby consumer usage and purchases studyRetrieved May 19, 2004, from http://www.hobby.org
30.
Holak, S. L., & Havlena, W. J. (1992). Nostalgia: An exploratory study of themes and emotions in the nostalgic experience. In J. F. Sherry & B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (19, pp. 380-387). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
31.
Hyllegard, K. H., & Fox, J. J. (1997). The value of gifts to college students: The impact of relationship, distance, gift occasion, and gift type. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(2), 103-114.
32.
Ice, J. (1993). Women's aesthetics and the quilting process. In S. T. Hollis, L. Pershing, & M. J. Young (Eds.), Feminist theory and the study of folklore (pp. 166-177). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Irwin, J. R. (1984). A people and their quiltsAtglen, PA: Schiffer Publ.
34.
Johnson, J. S., & Hawley, J. (2004). Technology's impact on creative traditions: Pieceful co-existence in quilting. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), 69-78.
35.
Knit-out and Crochet 2003 (2003). Washington, D.C. Knit-Out and Crochet 2003. Retrieved January 6, 2004, from http://www.knit-out.org
36.
Langellier, K. M. (1991). Contemporary quiltmaking in Maine: Refashioning femininityUncoverings: The 1990 Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, 11, 28-55.
37.
Levin, J. (1993). Why folklorists should study housework. In S. T. Hollis, L. Pershing, and M. J. Young (Eds.), Feminist theory and the study of folklore (pp. 285-296). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
38.
Lippard, L. (1995). Making something from nothing: Toward a definition of women's “hobby art.” The Pink Glass SwanNew York: New Press.
39.
Lipsett, L. O. (1985). Remember me: Women and their friendship quiltsSan Francisco: The Quilt Digest Press.
40.
Littrell, M. A., Reilly, R., & Stout, J. A. (1991). In-home businesses: Profiles of successful and struggling craft producers. Home Economics Research Journal, 20(1), 26-39.
41.
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), 601-616.
42.
Macdonald, A. L. (1988). No idle hands: The social history of American knittingNew York: Ballentine.
43.
MacDowell, M., & Fitzgerald, R. D. (1988). Michigan quilts: 150 years of a textile traditionEast Lansing: Michigan State University Museum.
44.
Martin, A. S. (1993). Makers, buyers, and users: Consumerism as a material culture framework. Winterthur Portfolio: A Journal of American Material Culture, 28(2/3), 141-158.
45.
McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activitiesBloomington: Indiana University Press.
46.
Myers, L. R. (2001). The joy of knitting: Texture, color, design, and the global knitting villagePhiladelphia: Running Press.
47.
Nargi, L. (2003). Knitting lessons: Tales from the knitting pathNew York: Putnam.
48.
Nelson, N. J., LaBat, K. L., & Williams, G. M. (2002). Contemporary Irish textile artists: Exploring experiences of gender, culture, and artistic medium. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20(1), 15-25.
49.
Paludin, L. (1995). Crochet: History and techniquesLoveland, CO: Interweave Press.
50.
Pandya, A., & Venkatesh, A. (1992). Symbolic communication among consumers in self-consumption and gift-giving: A semiotic approach. In J. F. Sherry and B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (19, pp. 147-154). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
51.
Pannebecker, R. K. (1990). Linking anthropology and history in textiles and clothing research: The ethnohistorical method. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(3), 14-18.
52.
Parker, R. (1984). The subversive stitchLondon: Women's Press Limited.
53.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Pershing, L. (1993). Peace work out of piecework: Feminist needlework metaphors and the ribbon around the Pentagon. In S. T. Hollis, L. Pershing, & M. J. Young (Eds.), Feminist theory and the study of folklore (pp. 327-357). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
55.
Plante, E. M. (1997). Women at home in Victorian America: A social historyNew York: Facts on File.
56.
Price, L. L., Arnold, E. J., & Curasi, C. F. (2000). Older consumers' disposition of special possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 179-201.
57.
Quilts, Inc. (2004). Quilting in America™ 2003Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://www.Quilts.com
58.
Reid, J. (2004). More love than money: Gifts of the 1930s. Piecework: Needlework's Living Legacy, 12(1), 34-37.
59.
Rikert, S. L., Harp, S. S., Horridge, P. E., & Shroyer, J. L. (1999). Documentation of Swedish patchwork quilts: 1830-1929. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 134-143.
60.
Roan, N., & Roan, D. (1993). Lest I shall be forgotten: Anecdotes and traditions of quiltsSouder-town, PA: Indian Valley Printing.
61.
Rott, M. (2004, April). Knot just for grandmothers: Student knitting group shares stories, relaxes. The Fontbanner, 33(5), pp. 1-1, 3-3.
62.
Rucker, M. H., Leckliter, L., Kivel, S., Dinkel, M., Freitas, T., Wynes, M., & Prato, H. (1991). When the thought counts: Friendship, love, gift exchanges and gift returns. In R. R. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (18-18, pp. 529-531). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
63.
Schofield-Tomschin, S., & Littrell, M. A. (2001). Textile handcraft guild participation: A conduit to successful aging. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 19(2), 41-51.
64.
Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practice of power: A feminist sociology of knowledgeToronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
65.
Strawn, S. M. (2003). Back to the knitting needle: The image of knitting in America, 1935-1955 [Abstract]. In I. Romaniw (Ed.), Proceedings of the Costume Society of America Annual Meeting and Symposium. Gateways of Fashion: Influence of Global Trading (p. 19-19). Earleville, MD: Costume Society of America.
66.
Veasney, P. V. (2003). Virtue leads and grace reveals: Embroideries and education in antebellum South CarolinaGreenville, SC: Curious Works Press.
67.
Warm Up America Foundation. (2003). About the Warm Up America FoundationRetrieved on January 13, 2004, from http://www.warmupamerica.com
68.
Webley, P., & Wilson, R. (1989). Social relationships and the unacceptability of money as a gift. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(1), 85-91.
69.
Weidlich, L. M. (1997). The Sunday friends: The group and their quilts. Uncoverings: The 1997 Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, 18, 67-94.
70.
Weldon's Practical Needlework, (Vol. 1). (1999). Inter-weave Press. (Original work published in 1888)
71.
Williams, C. N. (1992). Tradition and art: Two layers of meaning in the Bloomington quilters guild. Uncoverings: The 1984 Research Papers of the American Quilt Study Group, 12, 118-141.
72.
Williams, M. (1958). The velveteen rabbitNew York: Doubleday. (Original work published in 1922)
73.
Zieman, N. L., & Brown, G. (2003). Creative kindness: People and projects making a difference and you can, tooIola, WI: Krause.
