Recognizing the dynamic, complex nature of human systems and their interaction with multiple other systems led to the research question: What multidimensional theoretical framework could address this complexity and provide an expanded view for research and education, specifically in the field of clothing and textiles [CT]? Metatheory, a study of theories, was conducted using a qualitative research design. Data were collected from documents pertaining to systems theory and social psychology theories used by CT and were analyzed by the constant comparative method. Four main themes were identified—relationship, process, organization, and outcomes. The Human-Environment Systems Theoretical Framework was developed through an integration of the themes. Recommendations are made for using this holistic perspective to address dynamic, complex human-environment problems.
Akan, G. E., & Griol, C. M. (1995). Sociocultural influences on eating attitudes and behaviors, body image, and psychological functioning: A comparison of African-American, Asian-American, and Caucasian college women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18(2), 181-187.
2.
Arthur, L. B. (1997). Role salience, role embracement, and the symbolic self-completion of sorority pledges. Sociological Inquiry, 67(3), 364-379.
3.
Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education a journey to create the futureNJ: Educational Technology.
4.
Bartlewski, P., Brewer, B., & Van Raalte, J. (1996). Effects of aerobic exercise on the social physique anxiety and body esteem of female college students. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 5(2), 54-62.
5.
Bertalanffy, L. Von. (1952). Problems of life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
Bertalanffy, L. Von. (1975). Perspectives on general system theory, (E. Taschdjian, Ed.). New York: George Braziller.
7.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism perspective and methodNJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
Boulding, K. (1984). The economics of human bettermentAlbany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9.
Breunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., & Kune-Karrer, B. M. (1992). Metaframeworks transcending the models of family therapySan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187-249.
11.
Bubolz, M. M., Eicher, J. B., & Sontag, M. S. (1979, Spring). The human ecosystem: A model. Journal of Home Economics, 71, 28-31.
12.
Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (1988). Integration in home economics and human ecology. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 12, 1-14.
13.
Cerny, C. (1993). Semiotic perspectives in ethnography: Implications for the study of dress and identity. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Burns (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions: ITAA special publication no. 5 (pp. 69-81). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
14.
Compton, N. H., & Hall, O. A. (1972). Foundations of home economics research: A human ecology approachMinneapolis, MN: Burgess.
15.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: qualitative and quantitative approachesLondon: Sage.
16.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research designLondon: Sage.
17.
Damhorst, M. L. (1984-85). Meanings of clothing cues in social context. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 39-48.
18.
Damhorst, M. L. (1991). Relation of textiles and clothing research to scientific inquiry in social cognition. In S. B. Kaiser & M. L. Damhorst (Eds.), Critical linkages in textiles and clothing subject matter: Theory, method, and practice: Vol. 4 (pp. 191-202). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
19.
Davis, F. (1989). Of maids' uniforms and blue jeans: The drama of status ambivalences in clothing and fashion. Qualitative Sociology, 12(4), 337-355.
20.
Eicher, J. B. (1995). Dress, identity, culture, and choice: The complex act of dress. In C. M. Ladisch (Ed.), ITAA ProceedingsMonument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
21.
Forney, J. C., & Rabolt, N. J. (1990). Clothing values of women in two middle eastern cultures. Canadian Home Economics Journal, 40(4), 187-191.
22.
Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Gardner, H. (1990). Art education and human developmentLos Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust.
24.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
25.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.. (1967). The discovery of grounded theoryChicago: Aldine.
26.
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (1998). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 223-273). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Horn, M. J. (1975). The second skin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
Johnson, A. (1997). The forest and the treesPhiladelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Kaiser, S. (1990). The social psychology of clothing. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Kaiser, S. (1996). The social psychology of clothingNew York: Macmillan.
31.
Kaiser, S. B., Freeman, C. M., & Chandler, J. L. (1993). Favorite clothes and gendered subjectivities: Multiple readings. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 15, 27-50.
32.
Keeney, B. P. (1983). Aesthetics of change. New York: The Guilford Press.
33.
Kiel, F. C. (1998). Cognitive science and the origins of thought and knowledge. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 341-414). New York: John Wiley.
34.
Laszlo, E. (1972a). The systems view of the world: The natural philosophy of the new developments in the sciencesNew York: George Braziller.
35.
Laszlo, E. (Ed.). (1972b). The relevance of general systems theory: Papers presented to Ludwig von Bertalanffy on his seventieth birthdayNew York: George Braziller.
36.
Laszlo, E. (1972c). Introduction to systems philosophyNew York: Gordon and Breach, Science.
37.
Laszlo, E. (1995). The interconnected universe: Conceptual foundations of transdisciplinary unified theoryNJ: World Scientific.
38.
Lennon, S., & Davis, L. L. (1989). Clothing and human behavior from a social cognitive framework: Part I: Theoretical perspectives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(4), 41-48.
39.
Lennon, S., & Rudd, N. (1994). Linkages between attitudes toward gender roles, body satisfaction, self-esteem, and appearance management behaviors in women. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(2), 94-117.
40.
Lerner, R. M. (1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 27-32.
41.
Lerner, R. M. (1998). Theories of human development: Contemporary perspectives. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 1-24). New York: John Wiley.
42.
Lewontin, R. (1982). Human diversity. New York: Scientific American Library.
43.
Lieber, R. M., & Stiegal, M. D. (1979). Personality: Strategies and issuesPacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44.
Lieber, R. M., & Stiegal, M. D. (1990). Personality: Strategies and issues (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
45.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46.
Littrell, M. A., Damhorst, M., & Littrell, J. (1990, Spring). Clothing interests, body satisfaction, and eating behavior of adolescent females: Related or independent dimensions?Adolescence, 25(97), 77-95.
47.
Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (1998). Person-context interaction theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 713-759). New York: John Wiley.
48.
Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human natureArkana: Penguin.
49.
McGoldrick, M., Anderson, C. M., & Walsh, F. (1989). Women in families a framework for family therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
50.
Miller, K. A. (1997). Dress: Private and secret self-expression. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(4), 224-234.
51.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491-500.
53.
Nagasawa, R. H., Kaiser, S. B., & Hutton, S. S. (1995). Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part 2. From discovery to formalization. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13(4), 234-244.
54.
Nice, K. J. (1988). Science epistemology. In K. J. Nice (Ed.), Science and other ways of knowing (pp. 23-24). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
55.
Pannabecker, R. K. (1997). Fashioning theory: A critical discussion of the symbolic interactionist theory of fashion. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(3), 178-183.
56.
Pederson, E. L. (1984). The ecological alternative: An option for the future. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2(2), 22-24.
57.
Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A primer in theory constructionNew York: Macmillan.
58.
Ritzer, G. (1991). Metatheorizing in sociologyToronto: Lexington Books.
59.
Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., Levine, R. A., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human devleopment (5th ed., pp. 865-937). New York: John Wiley.
60.
Sontag, M. S., & Bubolz, M. M. (1996). Families on small farms: Case studies in human ecology. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Press.
61.
Sontag, M. S., & Schlater, J. D. (1995). Clothing and human values: A two-dimensional model for measurement. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13(1), 1-10.
62.
Stone, G. P. (1965). Appearance and the self. In M. E. Roach & J. B. Eicher (Eds.), Dress, adornment, and the social order: Dress and the individual (pp. 216-245). New York: John Wiley.
63.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniquesNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
Svensson, T. G. (1992). Clothing in the Arctic: A means of protection, a statement of identity. Artic, 45(1), 62-73.
65.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563-634). New York: John Wiley.
66.
Thelen, M. H., & Cormier, J. F. (1995). Desire to be thinner and weight control among children and their parents. Behavior Therapy, 26, 85-99.
67.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The development of the concept of development: Historical and epistemological perspectives. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 189-232). New York: John Wiley.
68.
Wachs, T. D. (2000). Necessary but not sufficient: The respective roles of single and multiple influences on individual developmentWashington, DC: American Psychological Association.
69.
Wapner, S., & Demick, J. (1998). Developmental analysis: A holistic, developmental, systems-oriented perspective. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 761-806). New York: John Wiley.
