Choices regarding where and how a company's production will take place can significantly impact that company's market performance. To determine significant influences on sourcing strategies in the U.S. apparel industry, a modified transaction cost approach was used, including predictors such as production costs in addition to transaction cost measures. Survey data from 82 U.S. apparel manufacturers were analyzed using logistic regression. Significant predictors of a company's decision to engage in domestic production only versus domestic and offshore production were (a) the size of the company and (b) perceived flexibility of U.S. production. Significant predictors of the proportion of a company's offshore production were (a) the company's foreign business experience, (b) the perception that the company's products are sensitive to fashion change, and (c) perceived flexibility of offshore production. The only significant predictor of decisions to make (use inside production), buy (use outside production), or both was the perceived fashionability of the products.
Abernathy, F. H., Dunlop, J. T., Hammond, J. H., & Weil, D. (1999). A stitch in timeNew York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1483-1536.
3.
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
4.
Bettis, R., Bradley, S., & Hamel, G. (1992). Outsourcing and industrial decline. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 7-22.
5.
Bryce, D. J., & Useem, M. (1998). The impact of corporate outsourcing on company value. European Management Journal, 16(6), 635-643.
6.
Christerson, B., & Appelbaum, R. P. (1995). Global and local subcontracting: Space, ethnicity, and the organization of apparel production. World Development, 23, 1363-1374.
7.
Coughlan, A. T., & Flaherty, M. T. (1983). Measuring the international marketing productivity of U.S. semiconductor companies. In David Gautschi (Ed.), Productivity in Distribution Systems (pp. 123-139). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
8.
David, S., & Schwartz, S. (personal communication, October 20, 1990)
9.
Davidson, W. H. (1982). Global strategic management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10.
Dertouzos, M. L., Lester, R. K., & Solow, R. M. (1989). Made in America: Regaining the productive edge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11.
Dickerson, K. G. (1999). Textiles and apparel in the global economy (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
Feenstra, R. C. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31-50.
13.
Forney, J. C., Rosen, D. M., & Orzechowski, J. M. (1990). Domestic versus overseas apparel production: Dialogue with San Francisco-based manufacturers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(3), 39-44.
14.
Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. (1987). The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Marketing Science Institute, Working Paper Report, No. 87-103.
15.
Helleiner, G. K., & Lavergne, R. (1979). Intra-firm trade and industrial exports to the United States. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 297-311.
16.
Holton, R. (1971). Marketing policies in multinational corporations. California Management Review, 13(4), 57-67.
17.
Jarnow, J., & Dickerson, K. G. (1997). Inside the fashion businessUpper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Jernigan, M. H., & Easterling, C. R. (1997). Fashion merchandising and marketingNew York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
19.
Kincade, D., & Moore, M. A. (2000). The optimal use of apparel contracting. Paper presented at the 1999 meeting of the International Textile and Apparel Association, Santa Fe, NM. Abstract retrieved November 30, 2002, from http://www.itaaonline.org/ITAAnew/Proceedings2000/
20.
Lall, S. (1978). The pattern of intra-firm exports by U.S. multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics Statistics, 40, 209-220.
21.
Levy, B. (1991). Transaction costs, the size of the firms, and industrial policy: Lessons from a comparative case study of the footwear industry in Korea and Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics, 34, 151-178.
22.
Lin, S. H., & Kincade, D. (2001). Make and buy decisions and apparel manufacturing strategy dimensions. Paper presented at the 2000 meeting of the International Textile and Apparel Association, Cincinnati, OH. Abstract retrieved November 30, 2002, from http://www.itaaonline.org/ITAAnew/Proceedings2001/
23.
McPherson, E. M. (1987). Apparel manufacturing management systems: A computer-oriented approach. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications.
24.
DMorawetz, D. (1980). Why the emperor's new clothes are not made in Columbia: A case study in Latin America and East Asian manufactured exports. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 368.
25.
Murray, J. Y. (2001). Strategic alliance-based global sourcing strategy for competitive advantage: A conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 9(4), 30-58.
26.
Murray, J. Y., & Kotabe, M. (1999). Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies: A modified transaction-cost analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 791-809.
27.
Parsons, C. A. (1987). Flexible production technology and industrial restructuring: Case studies of the metalworking, semiconductor and apparel industries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
28.
Peterson, S. J. (2001). Sewing machines, seismic shifts. Industrial Fabric Products Review, 78(2), 50-53.
29.
Rabolt, N. J., Bothwell, K., Forney, J. C., & Barry, M. (1988). Quality control in overseas apparel manufacturing. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 12, 389-397.
30.
Reda, S. (1994, January). Brand names. Stores, 76(1), 35-38.
31.
Shelanski, H. A., & Klein, P. G. (1995). Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(2), 335-361.
32.
Shim, S., & Kotsiopulos, A. (1994). Technology innovativeness and adopter categories of apparel gift retailers: From the diffusion of innovations perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(2), 46-57.
33.
Stopford, J. M., & Wells, L. T., Jr. (1972). Managing the multinational enterpriseNew York: Basic Books.
34.
Walker, G., and Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 373-391.
35.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implicationsNew York: Free Press.
36.
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
37.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.
38.
Williamson, O. E. (1987). The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Marketing Science Institute, Working Paper Report, No. 87-103.
