Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aesthetic expression of dress was examined by interviewing 15 midwestern university students. The objective was to understand the style development process and the motivations for clothing selection. The responses of participants selecting clothing from a variety of purchasing locations were analyzed. The purchasing sources examined were vintage or used clothing stores, a variety of sources used by cross-shoppers, and mainstream or mass market locations. In-depth interviews were analyzed for content. Aesthetic themes or categories emerged that helped to define differences: event dressing, imaging gender, variety clothes versus signature clothes, apparel meanings, process of ensemble, and customization of clothing purchases. These categories were analyzed and compared with those identified in the literature and with postmodern characteristics outlined by Evans and Thornton (1989). Understanding individual motivations in aesthetic expression and sourcing locations will aid in the study of fashion change.

Keywords

aesthetics design dress postmodern.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Brodman, B. (1994). Paris or perish: The plight of the Latin American Indian in a westernized world. In S. Benstock & S. Ferriss (Eds.), On fashion (pp. 267-283). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Coward, R. (1985). Female desires: How they are sought, bought, and packaged. NY: Grove Press.

Davis, F. (1992). Fashions, culture and identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

DeLong, M. (1998). The way we look: Dress and aesthetics. New York: Fairchild Publications.

Eaton, M. (1988). Basic issues in aesthetics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing.

Evans, C. , & Thornton, M. (1989). Women and fashion: A new look. Great Britian: Quartet Books, Ltd.

Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. London: Routledge.

Foster, H. (1985). Recodings: Art, spectacle, cultural politics. Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press.

10.

Hassen, I. (1980). The question of postmodernism. In H. Garvin(Ed.), Buciknell Review, 25(2), 117-126.

11.

Harvey, D. (1990). The condition ofpostmodemity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

12.

Hebdige, D. (1988). Hiding in the light: On images and things. London and New York: Methuen .

13.

Henderson, B. (1994). Teaching aesthetics in a postmodern environment . International Textile and Apparel Association Special Publication , 7, 39-47.

14.

Henderson, B. (1995). Dress in a postmodern era: Definition of an aesthetic expression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

15.

Herr, C. (1994). Terrorist chic: Style and domination in contemporary Ireland. In S. Benstock & S. Ferriss (Eds.), On fashion (pp. 235-266). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

16.

Huyssen, A. (1986). After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

17.

Jarnow, J. , & Dickerson, K. (1997). Inside the fashion business. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

18.

Jencks, C. (1980). Late-modem architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

19.

Jencks, C. ( 1984). The language of post-modern architecture. London: Academy Editions.

20.

Jencks, C. (1987). Post-modernism: The new classicism in art and architecture. New York: Rizzoli .

21.

Kaiser, S. , Nagasawa, R. , & Hutton, S. (1995). Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part 1, ambivalence and change. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13(3), 172-183.

22.

Kidwell, C. , & Christman, M. (1974). Suiting everyone: The democratization of clothing in America. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

23.

Morgado, M. (1996). Coming to terms with Postmodern: Theories and concepts of contemporary culture and their implications for apparel scholars . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14( 1 ), 41-53.

24.

Rogers, C. (1945). The non-directive method as a technique for social research. American Journal of Sociology, 50, 279-283.

25.

Rose, M. (Ed.). (1991). The post-modern & the post-industrial. New York: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Ross, A. (1994). Tribalism in effect. In S. Benstock & S. Ferriss (Eds.), On fashion (pp. 284-299). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

27.

Soltis, J. (1978). An introduction to the analysis of educational concepts (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

28.

Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitatitive research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

29.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. New York: State University of New York Press.

30.

Walton, K. (1970). Categories of art. Philosophical Review, 79, 334-367.

31.

Wilson, E. (1993). Chic thrills: A fashion reader. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Dress in a Postmodern Era: An Analysis of Aesthetic Expression and Motivation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References