In any field it is important to understand how knowledge is produced and how the production of knowledge affects what is known. Put another way, how have the conclusions drawn from research in textiles, clothing, and human behavior been structured by and affected by the research questions posed, the methods used to collect data, or even the training of its scholars? In this paper we offer a matrix of dimensions as an outline for analyzing research focusing on human behavior as it is related to textiles and clothing. Five broad dimensions are suggested for use in organizing research and in providing insight as to how knowledge in this field has been produced: (a) type of strategy used, (b) time frame, (c) origin of data elicited, (d) technique of data elicitation, and (e) qualitative or quantitative treatment of data. Each dimension is discussed, examples are provided, and related limitations are presented. Given the dimensions presented, we conclude with a discussion of how knowledge is shaped by how it is produced.
Abraham-Murali, L., & Littrell, M.A. (1995). Consumers' perceptions of apparel quality over time: An exploratory study. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 149-158.
2.
Anspach, K.A., & Kwon, Y.H. (1976). Western dress styles adopted by Korean women. Home Economics Research Journal, 4, 235-242.
3.
Baugh, D., & Davis, L.L. (1989). The effect of store image on consumer perceptions of designer and private label clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 15-21.
4.
Behling, D.U., & Wilch, J. (1988). Perceptions of branded clothing by male consumers . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(2), 43-47.
5.
Bogaty, H., Hollies, N.R.S., & Harris, M. (1956). The judgment of harshness of fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 26, 355-360.
6.
Brannon, E.L. (1993). Affect and cognition in appearance management: A review. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp. 82-92). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
7.
Breakwell, G.M. (1995). Research: Theory and method. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond , & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 5-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park: Sage.
9.
Buckley, H.M. (1983). Attraction toward a stranger as a linear function of similarity in dress. Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 25-34.
10.
Buckley, H.M. (1984-85). Toward an operational definition of dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 1-10.
11.
Buckley, H.M., & Roach, M.E. (1981). Attraction as a function of attitudes and dress . Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 88-97.
12.
Bums, L.D., & Lennon, S.J. (1993). The effect of clothing on the use of person information categories in first impressions. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 9-15.
13.
Bums, L.D., & Lennon, S.J. (1994). The look and the feel: Methods for measuring aesthetic perceptions of textiles and apparel. In M. DeLong & A. M. Fiore (Eds.), Aesthetics of textiles and clothing: Advancing multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 120-130). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association .
14.
Campbell, J.A., & Brandt, B. (1994). "No seamstresses, no ready-made clothing," clothing consumption on the American frontier, 1850-1890. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(3), 16-21.
15.
Chen, P., & Bums, L.D. (1998). A cross-national comparison of parent-consumers' evaluative criteria used for purchasing pre-school children's apparel. In N. Miller & M. Littrell (Eds.), International apparel consumer behavior (pp. 16-24). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
16.
Clayton, R.V., Lennon, S.J., & Larkin, J. (1987). Perceived fashionability of a garment as inferred from the age and body type of the wearer. Home Economics Research Journal, 15, 237-246.
17.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1980). Research methods in education (2nd Ed.). London: Croon Helm.
18.
Compton, N.H., & Hall, O.A. (1972). Foundations of home economics research. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Company.
19.
Crews, P.C., & James, M.M. (1996). Continuity and change in Nebraska quiltmakers, 1870-1989. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 7-15.
20.
Crown, E.M. (1978). Consumer perception and acceptance of color change in textiles. Home Economics Research Journal, 6,206-211.
21.
Daly, M.C., Eicher, J.B., & Erekosima, T.V. (1986). Male and female artistry in Kalabari dress. African Arts, 19(3), 48-51, 83.
22.
Damhorst, M.L. (1984-85). Meanings of clothing cues in social context . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 39-48.
23.
Damhorst, M.L. (1990). In search of a common thread: Classification of information communicated through dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 1-12.
24.
Damhorst, M.L. (1991). Gender and appearance in daily comic strips. Dress, 18, 59-67.
25.
Damhorst, M.L., & Littrell, M.A. (1993). Soc-psych workshop: Initiation, planning, outcomes, and future directions. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp. 25-27). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
26.
Davis, L.L. (1984-85). Sex, gender identity, and behavior concerning sex-related clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 3(2), 20-24.
27.
Davis, L.L. (1985). Effects of physical quality and brand labeling on perceptions of clothing quality. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 61, 671-677.
28.
Davis, L.L. (1987). Consumer use of label information in ratings of clothing quality and clothing fashionability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6, 8-14.
29.
Davis, L.L., & Lennon, S.J. (1983). Social stigma of pregnancy. Psychological Reports, 53, 997-998.
30.
Davis, L.L., & Lennon, S.J. (1989). Apparel advertising appeals as a function of apparel classification: Trendy versus classic. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1011=1014.
31.
Davis, L.L., & Miller, F.G. (1983). Conformity and judgments of fashionability. Home Economics Research Journal, 11, 337-342.
32.
DeLong, M.R., Minshall, B., & Larntz, K. (1987). Predicting consumer response to fashion apparel . Home Economics Research Journal, 16, 150-160.
33.
Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. London: The Butterworth Group.
34.
Dickson, M.A., & Littrell, M.A. (1996). Socially responsible behaviour: Values and attitudes of the alternative trading organisation consumer. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 1(1), 50-69.
35.
Dickson, M.A., & Littrell, M.A. (1997). Consumers of clothing from alternative trading organizations: Societal attitudes and purchase evaluative criteria. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15, 20-33.
36.
Dickson, M.A., & Littrell, M.A. (1998). Organizational culture for small textile and apparel businesses in Guatemala. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(2), 68-78.
37.
Domina, T., & Koch, K. (1997). The textile waste lifecycle. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(2), 96-102.
38.
Dubler, M.L.J., & Gurel, L.M. (1984). Depression: Relationships to clothing and appearance self-concept. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 21-26.
39.
Eckman, M., Damhorst, M.L., & Kadolph, S.J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22.
Erekosima, T.V., & Eicher, J.B. (1994). The aesthetics of men's dress of the Kalabari of Nigeria. In M. DeLong & A. M. Fiore (Eds.), Aesthetics of textiles and clothing: Advancing multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 185-199). Monument, CO : International Textile and Apparel Association.
43.
Fairhurst, A., Lennon, S.J., & Yu, H. (1996). Retail buyers' and manufacturers' sales representatives' perceptions of market show services in small apparel markets. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 161-168.
44.
Feather, B.L., Kaiser, S.B., & Rucker, M. (1988). Mastectomy and related treatments: Impact on appearance satisfaction on self-esteem. Home Economics Research Journal , 17, 127-139.
45.
Freeman, C.M., Kaiser, S.B., & Wingate, S.B. (1985-1986). Perceptions of functional clothing by persons with physical disabilities: A social-cognitive framework. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4(1), 46-52.
46.
Gaal, B.D. (1996). Apparel descriptions in catalogs and perceived risk associated with catalog purchases. Unpublished masters thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
47.
Giddings, V.L., & Boles, J.F. (1990). Comparison of the anthropometry of black males and white males with implications for pants fit. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(3), 25-28.
48.
Hamilton, J. (1993). Dress and the dynamics of culture: Implications for theory, method, and content. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp. 48-56). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
49.
Hamilton, J., & Hamilton, J.W. (1989). Dress as a reflection and sustainer of social reality: A cross-cultural perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(2), 16-22.
50.
Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
51.
Harrison, A., Sommer, R., Rucker, M., & Moore, M. (1986). Standing out from the crowd: Personalization of graduation attire. Adolescence, 21, 863-874.
52.
Hathcote, J.M., & Schulte, D.D. (1996). Specialty retail buyers' evaluations of regional apparel marts' attributes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 192-199.
53.
Hines, J.D., & O'Neal, G.S. (1995). Underlying determinants of clothing quality: The consumers' perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 13, 227-233.
54.
Hirschman, E.C. (1981). American Jewish ethnicity: Its relationship to some selected aspects of consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing,45, 102-110.
55.
Hogge, V.E., Baer, M., & Kang-Park, J. (1988). Clothing for elderly and non-elderly men: A comparison of preferences, perceived availability and fitting problems. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(4), 47-53.
56.
Holbrook, M.B., & Schindler, R.M. (1994). Age, sex, and attitude toward the past as predictors of consumers' aesthetic tastes for cultural products. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 412-422.
57.
Horn, L., & Wilson, L. (1993). Textile production in the communalistic German colony at Bethel, Missouri: 1844-1879. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 43-50.
58.
Huddleston, P., Ford, I., & Bickle, M.C. (1993). Demographic and lifestyle characteristics as predictors of fashion opinion leadership among mature consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11, 26-31.
59.
Huddleston, P., & Oliver, B.A. (1995). Canadian exporting and non-exporting apparel firms: An analysis of manager-related variables. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 165-171.
60.
Hunt, P.K. (1996). Osnaburg overalls, calico frocks, and homespun suits: The use of 19th Century Georgia newspaper notices to research slave clothing and textiles. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 14, 200-203.
61.
Hunt, P.K., & Sibley, L.R. (1994). African American women's dress in Georgia, 1890-1914: A photographic examination. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(2), 21-26.
62.
Jackson, H.O. (1992). Aging and expenditures on apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 24-28.
63.
Jackson, H.O., & O'Neal, G.S. (1994). Dress and appearance responses to perceptions of aging. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 8-15.
64.
Johnson, K.K.P., & Roach-Higgins, M.E. (1987a). Dress and physical attractiveness of women in job interviews. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 5(3), 1-8.
65.
Johnson, K.K.P., & Roach-Higgins, M.E. (1987b). The influence of physical attractiveness and dress on campus recruiters' impressions of female job applicants . Home Economics Research Journal, 16, 87-95.
66.
Johnson, K.K.P., & Workman, J.E. (1990). Effect of fiber-content information on perception of fabric characteristics. Home Economics Research Journal , 19(2), 132-138.
67.
Johnson, K.K.P., & Workman, J.E. (1992). Clothing and attributions concerning sexual harassment . Home Economics Research Journal, 21 (2), 160-172.
68.
Kaiser, S.B. (1989). Clothing and social organization of gender perception: A developmental approach. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 7(2), 46-56.
69.
Kaiser, S.B. (1993). Linking the social psychology of dress to culture: A contextual perspective. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp.39-47). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
70.
Kaiser, S.B. (1997). The social psychology of clothing: Symbolic appearances in context (2nd Ed. Rev.). New York: Fairchild Publications.
71.
Kaiser, S.B., Rudy, M., & Byfield; P. (1985). The role of clothing in sex-role socialization: Person perceptions versus overt behavior. Child Study Journal , 15, 83-97.
72.
Kelley, E., Gray, J., & Blouin, D. (1980). Consumers' priorities for flame retardant protection . Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 105-115.
73.
Kim, H., & Winakor, G. (1996). Fabric hand as perceived by U.S. and Korean males and females. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 133-144.
74.
Kincade, D.H. (1995). Quick response management system for the apparel industry: Definition through technologies. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 245-251.
75.
Kwon, K., Bums, L.D., & Chang, Y. (1993). Fashion information seeking by Korean and U. S. fashion leaders. In G. S. Albaum, et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Cross-Cultural Consumer and Business Studies (pp. 219-223).
76.
Laing, R.M., & Ingham, P.E. (1983-84). The effectiveness of specimen tactile evaluation as a predictor of garment tactile acceptability for garments as a whole and on a regional basis. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 2(1), 58-63.
77.
Lapitsky, M., & Smith, C.M. (1981). Impact of clothing on impressions of personal characteristics and writing ability. Home Economics Research Journal, 9,327-335.
78.
Laughlin, J., & Kean, R.C. (1995). Assessment of textiles and clothing academic programs in the United States. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 13, 184-199.
79.
Laughlin, J., & Kean, R.C. (1996). Assessment of textiles and clothing academic programs in the United States: Part II, Unit characteristics and faculty. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 145-160.
80.
Lawson, L., & Lorentzen, D. (1990). Selected sports bras: Comparisons of comfort and support. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(4), 55-60.
81.
Lee, M., & Bums, L.D. (1993). Self-consciousness and clothing purchase criteria of Korean and United States college Women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(3), 367-379.
82.
Lee, H., & Dardis, R. (1991). Interfiber competition in the United States: An analysis. Home Economics Research Journal, 20(2), 95-108.
83.
Lennon, S.J. (1990). Clothing and changing sex roles: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analyses. Home Economics Research Journal, 18, 245-254.
84.
Lennon, S.J. (1991). Appearance and roles in television sitcoms. Dress,18, 53-59.
85.
Lennon, S.J. (1997). Physical attractiveness, age, and body type: Further evidence. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(1), 60-64.
86.
Lennon, S.J., & Bums, L.D. (1993). Analysis of clothing and personal appearance symbols in characterization. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp.160-171). Monument, CO : International Textile and Apparel Association.
87.
Lennon, S.J., Bums, L.D., & Rowold, K.L. (1995). Dress and human behavior research: Sampling, subjects, and consequences for statistics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 262-272.
88.
Lennon, S.J., & Davis, L.L. (1987). Individual differences in fashion orientation and cognitive complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 327-330.
89.
Lennon, S.J., & Davis, L.L. (1989). Customer service as a function of customer appearance and salesperson goals. Home Economics Forum, 9, 9-11, 18.
90.
Lennon, S.J., & Miller, F. (1984). The salience of physical appearance in impression formation. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 95-104.
91.
Levy, E. (1990). Stage, sex, and suffering: Images of women in American films, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8(1), 53-76.
92.
Lin, S.H., Kincade, D.H., & Warfield, C. (1995). Analysis of sewing systems with a focus on Alabama apparel producers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 13, 30-37.
93.
Littrell, M.A. (1980). Home economists as cross-cultural researchers: A field study of Ghanaian clothing selection. Home Economics Research Journal, 8, 307-316.
94.
Loker, S. (1993). A comparison of qualitative and quantitative approaches to the social aspects of dress. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions (pp. 146-152). Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association .
95.
Lynch, A., Detzner, D.F., & Eicher, J.B. (1995). Hmong American new year rituals: Generational bonds through dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 13, 111-120.
96.
Lynch, A., Detzner, D.F., & Eicher, J.B. (1996). Transmission and reconstruction of gender through dress: Hmong American new year rituals. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 257-266.
97.
Michelman, S.O., & Eicher, J.B. (1995). Dress and gender in Kalabari women's societies . Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 121-130.
98.
Michelman, S.O., & Erekosima, T.V. (1992). Kalabari dress in Nigeria . In R. Barnes & J. B. Eicher (Eds.), Dress and gender: Making and meaning (pp. 164-182). Oxford: Berg.
99.
Miller, F., Davis, L.L., & Rowold, K.L. (1982). Public self-consciousness, social anxiety, and attitudes toward the use of clothing. Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 363-368.
100.
Miller F., Hurkman, F., Feinberg, R., & Robinson, J. (1979). Status and evaluation potential in the social facilitation and impairment of task performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 381-385.
101.
Miller, F.G., & Rowold, K.L. (1980). Attire, sex-roles, and responses to requests for directions. Psychological Reports, 47, 661-662.
102.
Munson, D., & Huck, J. (1993). Pesticide use and applicator practices of commercial cattle feeders. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 66-72.
103.
Nagasawa, R.H., Kaiser, S.B., & Hutton, S.S. (1996). Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part 3. Context of explanation. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14(1), 54-62.
104.
Norum, P.S. (1989). Economic analysis of quarterly household expenditures on apparel. Home Economics Research Journal, 17(3), 228-240.
105.
Norum, P.S., Weagley, R.O., & Norton, M.J.T. (1998). The effect of uniforms on nonuniform apparel expenditures. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 26, 259-280.
106.
Pannabecker, R.K. (1991). Clio a la Mode: Methods for studying historic costume and textiles. In S. B. Kaiser & M. L. Damhorst (Eds.), Critical linkages in textiles and clothing subject matter: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 160-167). Monument, CO: International Textiles and Apparel Association .
107.
Paoletti, J.B. (1985). Ridicule and role models as factors in American men's fashion change, 1880-1910. Costume,19, 121-134.
108.
Paoletti, J.B., Beeker, C., & Pelletier, D. (1987). Men's jacket styles, 1919-1941: An example of coordinated content analysis and object study. Dress,13, 44-48.
109.
Park, S., Warner, P., & Fitzgerald, T.K. (1993). The process of westernization: Adoption of western-style dress by Korean women, 1945-1962. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(3), 39-47.
110.
Patterson, C.A., & Warden, J. (1983-84). Selected body measurements of women aged sixty-five and older. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 2, 23-30.
111.
Rabolt, N.J., & Forney, J.C. (1989). Contemporary Saudi Arabian women's dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 22-32.
112.
Rentz, J.O., & Reynolds, F.D. (1991). Forecasting the effects of an aging population on product consumption: An age-period-cohort framework . Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 355-360.
113.
Reynolds, F.D., & Rentz, J.O. (1981). Cohort analysis: An aid to strategic planning . Journal of Marketing,45, 63-70.
114.
Riley, M.W., Johnson, M., & Foner, A. (1972). Aging and society: A sociology of age stratification . New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
115.
Rosencranz. M.L. (1962). Clothing symbolism. Journal of Home Economics, 54, 18-22.
116.
Rucker, M., Taber, D., & Harrison, A. (1981). The effect of clothing variation on first impressions of female job applicants. Social Behavior and Personality , 9(1), 53-64.
117.
Rucker, M., Freitas, A., Daw, A., Desai, R., Fox, S., Haugen, E., Karp, R., Lopez, S., Mize, E., Munster, L., Sammons, P., Sim, M., & Yant, A. (1994). To get or to receive: Attitudes toward monadic versus dyadic gift giving by ethnic identity. In J. A. Cote & S. M. Leong (Eds.), Asian Pacific Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 1: pp. 87-90). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
118.
Rudd, N.A. (1981). Textiles and clothing curriculum: Current trends andfuture directions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
119.
Ryder, N.B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843-861.
120.
Salusso-Deonier, C., DeLong, M.R., & Martin, F.B. (1979). Weight loss and the resulting fit and size change of ready-to-wear for American women. Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 186-205.
121.
Saunders, C., & Stead, B. (1986). Women's adoption of a business uniform: A content analysis of magazine advertisements. Sex Roles,15(½), 197-206.
122.
Scheller, H.P., & Kunz, G.I. (1998). Toward a grounded theory of apparel quality. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(2), 57-67.
123.
Schutz, H.G., & Phillips, B.A. (1976). Consumer perceptions of textiles. Home Economics Research Journal, 5, 2-14.
124.
Shakin, M., Shakin, D., & Sternglanz, S. (1985). Infant clothing: Sex labeling for strangers. Sex Roles,12(9/10), 955-963.
125.
Shim, S., & Kotsiopulos, A. (1992). Patronage behavior of apparel shopping: Part 1. Shopping orientations, store attributes, information sources, and personal characteristics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 48-57.
126.
Shim, S., & Kotsiopulos, A. (1994). Technology innovativeness and adopter categories of apparel/gift retailers: From the diffusion of innovations perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 46-57.
127.
Sibley, L.R., & Jakes, K.A. (1989). Etowah textile remains and cultural context: A model for inference. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 7(2), 37-45.
128.
Sibley, L.R., & Jakes, K.A. (1994). Coloration in Etowah textiles from Burial No. 57. In D. A. Scott & P. Meyers (Eds.), Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian sites and artifacts (pp. 395-418). The Getty Conservation Institute .
129.
Sibley, L.R., Jakes, K.A., & Song, C. (1989). Fiber and yarn processing by prehistoric people of North America: Examples from Etowah. Ars Textrina, 11, 191-209.
130.
Sibley, L.R., Jakes, K.A., & Swinker, M.E. (1992). Etowah feather remains from Burial 57: Identification and context. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 21-28.
131.
Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles,14(9/10), 519-532.
132.
Smucker, B., & Creekmore, A.M. (1972). Adolescents' clothing conformity, awareness, and peer awareness. Home Economics Research Journal , 1, 92-97.
133.
Stanforth, N.F., & Lennon, S.J. (1997). Customer expectations and store policies: Satisfaction, patronage and retail store service. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15, 115-124.
134.
Swinyard, W.R. (1993). The effects of mood, involvement, and quality of store experience on shopping intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 271-280.
135.
Touliatos, J., & Compton, N.H. (1988). Research methods in human ecology/home economics . Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
136.
Trautman, P. (1984-85). An Eighteenth-century American tailor: Myth and reality, as seen through one tailor's surviving records. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 25-30.
137.
Warfield, C. (1987). Upholstered furniture: Results of a consumer wear study. Textile Research Journal, 57, 192-199.
138.
Wagner, J. (1986). Expenditures for household textiles and textile home furnishings: An Engel curve analysis. Home Economics Research Journal, 15(1), 21-31.
139.
Wagner, J., & Hanna, S. (1983). The effectiveness of family life cycle variables in consumer expenditure research. Journal of Consumer Research , 10, 281-291.
140.
Wilson, C.A., & Laing, R.M. (1995a). Investigation of selected tactile and thermal characteristics of upholstery fabrics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 200-207.
141.
Wilson, C.A., & Laing, R.M. (1995b). The effect of wool fiber variables on tactile characteristics of homogeneous woven fabrics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13, 208-212.
142.
Winakor, G., & Goings, B.D. (1973). Fashion preference: Measurement of change. Home Economics Research Journal, 1, 195-209.
143.
Wolfe, J.H., & Dickson, M.A. (in press). Child labor in apparel production: Suggestions for industry . In H. Lakner & S. Douglas, (Eds.), International issues related to the textiles, apparel, and retailing industries. Monument, CO: International Textile and Apparel Association.
144.
Workman, J.E. (1990). Status characteristics theory: An application to clothing research. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 8(4), 49-54.
145.
Workman, J.E., & Johnson, K.K.P. (1989). The role of clothing in extended inferences. Home Economics Research Journal, 18(2), 164-169.
146.
Workman, J.E., & Johnson, K.K.P. (1993). Cultural aesthetics and the social construction of gender. In S. J. Lennon & L. D. Bums (Eds.), Social science aspects of dress: New directions. Monument, CO: International Textiles and Apparel Association .
147.
Wylie, M.J., Crown, E.M., & Morris, M.A. (1976). Consumer reaction to color performance in textiles . Home Economics Research Journal, 5, 167-175.
148.
Yu, H., Fairhurst, A., & Lennon, S.J. (1996). Small retail store buyers' responses to apparel markets: Perceptions and choices. Journal of Small Business Research,34(4), 14-22.
