Abstract
Dateline: The Southwest. A utilities company comes under attack for "excessive" executive compensation practices. These practices include supplying a cov ered garage and awarding bonuses to executives.
Dateline: The Midwest. A disgruntled employee of a publicly owned beauty-supply company sues her employers, complaining of excessive executive com pensation. Her case is based on the argument that given her age and experience in the field, her com pensation should match management's.
Dateline: The South. A minority shareholder accuses a husband-and-wife-owned investment firm of shady practices when it comes to self-compensation. The shareholder states that the owners are being compen sated far above what is considered appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
